DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, mvarlese@suse.de
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mk: clean up static link with DPAA libraries
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2018 10:25:57 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1759755.H60iFR18bq@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b5a1d866-c4c9-6b40-3eb6-8afed2fa4c21@nxp.com>

23/02/2018 07:25, Hemant Agrawal:
> Hi Thomas,
> On 2/23/2018 4:23 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > The bus and mempool dependencies should be declared after the PMD
> > libraries needing them.
> > 
> > Moreover there is no need to disable the PMDs at the Makefile level,
> > in case the dependencies are not met.
> > Such dependencies should be handled at configuration time.
> > 
> > The other side effect of this clean-up is to take into account
> > the mempool option CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_DPAA2_MEMPOOL.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
> > ---
> >   mk/rte.app.mk | 20 ++++----------------
> >   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> This patch looks good, however I think we (NXP) need to also set some 
> dependency check in makefile to avoid dpaaX PMD compilations, if bus is 
> not available. I am working on a patch for the same.

Why do you think such check is necessary?
If the PMD is enable but not the bus, it is a configuration error.
A good configuration system would resolve it automatically,
but currently we do the configuration manually, so the user must fix
its configuration file.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-23  9:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 14:23 [dpdk-dev] DPDK 18.02 on ARM64 is broken Marco Varlese
2018-02-22 14:33 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2018-02-22 17:28 ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-02-22 20:00   ` Marco Varlese
2018-02-22 22:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: fix DPAA shared library dependency Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-22 22:53       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] mk: clean up static link with DPAA libraries Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-23  6:25         ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-02-23  9:25           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-02-23 10:02             ` Hemant Agrawal
2018-02-23  5:15       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] app/testpmd: fix DPAA shared library dependency Hemant Agrawal
2018-02-23  9:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Hemant Agrawal
2018-02-23  9:58         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] mk: fix the build dependency structure for dpaaX Hemant Agrawal
2018-03-13 23:36           ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1759755.H60iFR18bq@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=mvarlese@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).