patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maryam.tahhan@intel.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app: fix proc_info app dependency
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:59:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1761335.2jqO9XcO2K@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab9cedc7976ffda3060682a55d15d0cb187ad248.1515765793.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

12/01/2018 15:17, Anatoly Burakov:
> proc_info app is compiled unconditionally on Linux, but it's
> actually dependent on librte_ethdev library, which prevents
> DPDK from building without librte_ethdev library enabled.
> 
> Fixes: 22561383ea17 ("app: replace dump_cfg by proc_info")
> Cc: maryam.tahhan@intel.com
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org

nit: please insert a blank line here

> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
> ---
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_TEST_PMD) += test-pmd
> -DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP) += proc_info
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_EXEC_ENV_LINUXAPP),y)
> +DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_ETHER) += proc_info
> +endif
>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PDUMP) += pdump

What about pdump and testpmd?

I guess a lot of things do not compile without ethdev, isn't it?

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-12 14:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-12 14:17 [dpdk-stable] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-01-12 14:59 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2018-01-12 15:04   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Burakov, Anatoly
2018-01-12 15:41     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-12 17:49 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] app/procinfo: add compilation option in config file Anatoly Burakov
2018-01-12 18:02   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-12 18:05     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-01-12 18:27   ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] " Anatoly Burakov
2018-01-17 18:45     ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1761335.2jqO9XcO2K@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maryam.tahhan@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).