From: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
To: <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: <anoobj@marvell.com>, Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>,
Fan Zhang <fanzhang.oss@gmail.com>, Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>,
Arkadiusz Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>,
Ciara Power <ciara.power@intel.com>,
Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 7/7] app/test: check asymmetric capabilities in SM2 test
Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2023 19:24:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <195e5614db371abda6b1338108456d86bc77eed8.1696859505.git.gmuthukrishn@marvell.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1696859505.git.gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
Check asymmetric capabilities such as SM3 hash support and
internal RNG and accordingly choose op params for SM2 test.
Signed-off-by: Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gmuthukrishn@marvell.com>
Acked-by: Arkadiusz Kusztal <arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com>
---
app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c | 77 +++++++++++-----------
app/test/test_cryptodev_sm2_test_vectors.h | 28 +++++---
2 files changed, 57 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
index a2bb1f9336..94bb091df3 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_asym.c
@@ -608,6 +608,7 @@ static inline void print_asym_capa(
break;
case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECDSA:
case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_ECPM:
+ case RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_XFORM_SM2:
default:
break;
}
@@ -1806,7 +1807,7 @@ test_ecpm_all_curve(void)
}
static int
-_test_sm2_sign(bool rnd_secret)
+test_sm2_sign(void)
{
struct crypto_testsuite_params_asym *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
struct crypto_testsuite_sm2_params input_params = sm2_param_fp256;
@@ -1875,11 +1876,19 @@ _test_sm2_sign(bool rnd_secret)
else
asym_op->sm2.hash = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_NULL;
- asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.message.data;
- asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.message.length;
- asym_op->sm2.id.data = input_params.id.data;
- asym_op->sm2.id.length = input_params.id.length;
- if (rnd_secret) {
+ if (asym_op->sm2.hash == RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SM3) {
+ asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.message.data;
+ asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.message.length;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.data = input_params.id.data;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.length = input_params.id.length;
+ } else {
+ asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.digest.data;
+ asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.digest.length;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.data = NULL;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.length = 0;
+ }
+
+ if (capa->internal_rng != 0) {
asym_op->sm2.k.data = NULL;
asym_op->sm2.k.length = 0;
} else {
@@ -1928,7 +1937,7 @@ _test_sm2_sign(bool rnd_secret)
debug_hexdump(stdout, "s:",
asym_op->sm2.s.data, asym_op->sm2.s.length);
- if (!rnd_secret) {
+ if (capa->internal_rng == 0) {
/* Verify sign (by comparison). */
if (memcmp(input_params.sign_r.data, asym_op->sm2.r.data,
asym_op->sm2.r.length) != 0) {
@@ -1989,18 +1998,6 @@ _test_sm2_sign(bool rnd_secret)
return status;
};
-static int
-test_sm2_sign_rnd_secret(void)
-{
- return _test_sm2_sign(true);
-}
-
-__rte_used static int
-test_sm2_sign_plain_secret(void)
-{
- return _test_sm2_sign(false);
-}
-
static int
test_sm2_verify(void)
{
@@ -2064,19 +2061,28 @@ test_sm2_verify(void)
/* Populate op with operational details */
asym_op->sm2.op_type = RTE_CRYPTO_ASYM_OP_VERIFY;
+
if (rte_cryptodev_asym_xform_capability_check_hash(capa, RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SM3))
asym_op->sm2.hash = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SM3;
else
asym_op->sm2.hash = RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_NULL;
- asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.message.data;
- asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.message.length;
+ if (asym_op->sm2.hash == RTE_CRYPTO_AUTH_SM3) {
+ asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.message.data;
+ asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.message.length;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.data = input_params.id.data;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.length = input_params.id.length;
+ } else {
+ asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.digest.data;
+ asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.digest.length;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.data = NULL;
+ asym_op->sm2.id.length = 0;
+ }
+
asym_op->sm2.r.data = input_params.sign_r.data;
asym_op->sm2.r.length = input_params.sign_r.length;
asym_op->sm2.s.data = input_params.sign_s.data;
asym_op->sm2.s.length = input_params.sign_s.length;
- asym_op->sm2.id.data = input_params.id.data;
- asym_op->sm2.id.length = input_params.id.length;
RTE_LOG(DEBUG, USER1, "Process ASYM operation\n");
@@ -2116,7 +2122,7 @@ test_sm2_verify(void)
};
static int
-_test_sm2_enc(bool rnd_secret)
+test_sm2_enc(void)
{
struct crypto_testsuite_params_asym *ts_params = &testsuite_params;
struct crypto_testsuite_sm2_params input_params = sm2_param_fp256;
@@ -2185,7 +2191,8 @@ _test_sm2_enc(bool rnd_secret)
asym_op->sm2.message.data = input_params.message.data;
asym_op->sm2.message.length = input_params.message.length;
- if (rnd_secret) {
+
+ if (capa->internal_rng != 0) {
asym_op->sm2.k.data = NULL;
asym_op->sm2.k.length = 0;
} else {
@@ -2231,7 +2238,7 @@ _test_sm2_enc(bool rnd_secret)
debug_hexdump(stdout, "cipher:",
asym_op->sm2.cipher.data, asym_op->sm2.cipher.length);
- if (!rnd_secret) {
+ if (capa->internal_rng == 0) {
if (memcmp(input_params.cipher.data, asym_op->sm2.cipher.data,
asym_op->sm2.cipher.length) != 0) {
status = TEST_FAILED;
@@ -2295,18 +2302,6 @@ _test_sm2_enc(bool rnd_secret)
return status;
};
-static int
-test_sm2_enc_rnd_secret(void)
-{
- return _test_sm2_enc(true);
-}
-
-__rte_used static int
-test_sm2_enc_plain_secret(void)
-{
- return _test_sm2_enc(false);
-}
-
static int
test_sm2_dec(void)
{
@@ -2737,9 +2732,9 @@ static struct unit_test_suite cryptodev_openssl_asym_testsuite = {
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_dsa),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym,
test_dh_key_generation),
- TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_sign_rnd_secret),
+ TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_sign),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_verify),
- TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_enc_rnd_secret),
+ TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_enc),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_dec),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_rsa_enc_dec),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym,
@@ -2803,6 +2798,8 @@ static struct unit_test_suite cryptodev_octeontx_asym_testsuite = {
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_mod_exp),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym,
test_ecdsa_sign_verify_all_curve),
+ TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_sign),
+ TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym, test_sm2_verify),
TEST_CASE_ST(ut_setup_asym, ut_teardown_asym,
test_ecpm_all_curve),
TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */
diff --git a/app/test/test_cryptodev_sm2_test_vectors.h b/app/test/test_cryptodev_sm2_test_vectors.h
index 3d2dba1359..41f5f7074a 100644
--- a/app/test/test_cryptodev_sm2_test_vectors.h
+++ b/app/test/test_cryptodev_sm2_test_vectors.h
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ struct crypto_testsuite_sm2_params {
rte_crypto_param id;
rte_crypto_param cipher;
rte_crypto_param message;
+ rte_crypto_param digest;
int curve;
};
@@ -46,17 +47,17 @@ static uint8_t fp256_k[] = {
};
static uint8_t fp256_sign_r[] = {
- 0xf3, 0x26, 0x10, 0xde, 0xfb, 0xbf, 0x13, 0xd4,
- 0x73, 0xb1, 0xc2, 0x80, 0x51, 0x06, 0x29, 0xf9,
- 0xfb, 0xc8, 0x11, 0xa7, 0x8d, 0x2c, 0xcb, 0x09,
- 0x7c, 0xb2, 0xcf, 0x58, 0x0b, 0x5e, 0x25, 0xff
+ 0x75, 0x2B, 0x8C, 0x15, 0x38, 0x10, 0xF6, 0xC0,
+ 0x28, 0xC9, 0x8A, 0x51, 0xD0, 0x62, 0x69, 0x4B,
+ 0xF6, 0x58, 0x06, 0xEB, 0xF1, 0x91, 0x1F, 0x15,
+ 0x8B, 0x08, 0x09, 0xF9, 0x88, 0x0A, 0x44, 0x24
};
static uint8_t fp256_sign_s[] = {
- 0x8d, 0x8d, 0xb5, 0x40, 0xe3, 0xfb, 0x98, 0xf9,
- 0x8c, 0xe4, 0x58, 0x60, 0xf2, 0x78, 0x8f, 0xd9,
- 0xbf, 0xb8, 0x47, 0x73, 0x88, 0xc1, 0xd1, 0xcd,
- 0x2d, 0xdb, 0xe3, 0xc1, 0x44, 0x30, 0x25, 0x86
+ 0x5A, 0x3C, 0x96, 0x3E, 0x1C, 0xB4, 0x19, 0xF9,
+ 0xD7, 0x78, 0xB8, 0xCE, 0xFF, 0x9D, 0xB1, 0x31,
+ 0x77, 0xDB, 0xA0, 0xFE, 0x84, 0x61, 0x1A, 0xD9,
+ 0x4E, 0xFF, 0x82, 0x13, 0x1C, 0xCA, 0x04, 0x75,
};
static uint8_t fp256_id[] = {
@@ -68,6 +69,13 @@ static uint8_t fp256_message[] = {
0x64, 0x69, 0x67, 0x65, 0x73, 0x74
};
+static uint8_t fp256_digest[] = {
+ 0x0F, 0xB5, 0xCE, 0xF3, 0x3C, 0xB7, 0xD1, 0x35,
+ 0xA9, 0x3A, 0xC7, 0xA7, 0x89, 0x2A, 0x6D, 0x9A,
+ 0xF3, 0x1E, 0xC5, 0x38, 0xD3, 0x65, 0x1B, 0xB9,
+ 0xDF, 0x5F, 0x7F, 0x4A, 0xD8, 0x89, 0x57, 0xF1
+};
+
static uint8_t fp256_cipher[] = {
0x30, 0x78, 0x02, 0x21, 0x00, 0xAB, 0xBD, 0xE8,
0xE8, 0x80, 0x93, 0x36, 0x77, 0xB6, 0x44, 0x47,
@@ -121,6 +129,10 @@ struct crypto_testsuite_sm2_params sm2_param_fp256 = {
.data = fp256_message,
.length = sizeof(fp256_message),
},
+ .digest = {
+ .data = fp256_digest,
+ .length = sizeof(fp256_digest),
+ },
.cipher = {
.data = fp256_cipher,
.length = sizeof(fp256_cipher),
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-09 13:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-10 9:35 [v1 0/6] cryptodev: support digest message in SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-08-10 9:35 ` [v1 1/6] crypto/openssl: include SM2 in asymmetric capabilities Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-26 19:53 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2023-08-10 9:35 ` [v1 2/6] cryptodev: add RNG capability in EC based xform Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-26 19:53 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2023-08-10 9:35 ` [v1 3/6] cryptodev: add hash support in asymmetric capability Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-26 20:03 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2023-09-27 5:55 ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-08-10 9:35 ` [v1 4/6] cryptodev: use generic EC xform params for SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-26 20:05 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2023-08-10 9:35 ` [v1 5/6] app/test: check asymmetric capabilities in SM2 test Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-26 20:05 ` Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
2023-08-10 9:35 ` [v1 6/6] crypto/cnxk: add SM2 support Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-14 7:21 ` [v1 0/6] cryptodev: support digest message in SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] " Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] crypto/openssl: include SM2 in asymmetric capabilities Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] cryptodev: set private and public keys in EC session Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 12:44 ` Power, Ciara
2023-09-28 13:12 ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] cryptodev: add RNG capability in EC based xform Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] cryptodev: add hash algorithms in asymmetric capability Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] cryptodev: use generic EC xform params for SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] app/test: check asymmetric capabilities in SM2 test Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-27 11:37 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] crypto/cnxk: add SM2 support Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 0/7] cryptodev: support digest message in SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] crypto/openssl: include SM2 in asymmetric capabilities Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] cryptodev: add hash algorithms in asymmetric capability Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] cryptodev: use generic EC xform params for SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] cryptodev: set private and public keys in EC session Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-29 12:47 ` Power, Ciara
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] cryptodev: add RNG capability in EC based xform Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] crypto/cnxk: add SM2 support Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-09-28 17:09 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] app/test: check asymmetric capabilities in SM2 test Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] cryptodev: support digest message in SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] crypto/openssl: include SM2 in asymmetric capabilities Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] cryptodev: add hash algorithms in asymmetric capability Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] cryptodev: use generic EC xform params for SM2 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] cryptodev: set private and public keys in EC session Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] cryptodev: add RNG capability in EC based xform Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] crypto/cnxk: add SM2 support Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan
2023-10-09 13:54 ` Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan [this message]
2023-10-09 19:07 ` [PATCH v4 0/7] cryptodev: support digest message in SM2 Akhil Goyal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=195e5614db371abda6b1338108456d86bc77eed8.1696859505.git.gmuthukrishn@marvell.com \
--to=gmuthukrishn@marvell.com \
--cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
--cc=arkadiuszx.kusztal@intel.com \
--cc=ciara.power@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=fanzhang.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
--cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).