DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
To: "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/lpm:fix an initialization issue of valid_group in the delete_depth_small()
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 08:05:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC22BC738D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20151030142227.GB10520@bricha3-MOBL3>



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richardson, Bruce
> Sent: Friday, October 30, 2015 10:22 PM
> To: Liu, Jijiang
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/lpm:fix an initialization issue of
> valid_group in the delete_depth_small()
> 
> On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 09:14:39PM +0800, Jijiang Liu wrote:
> 
> Title can be shortened to: "lpm: fix initialization of valid_group field"
Ok
> > Fixes an initialization issue of 'valid_group' in the delete_depth_small
> function.
> >
> > In this function, use new rte_lpm_tbl8_entry we call A to replace the
> > old rte_lpm_tbl8_entry. But the valid_group do not set VALID, so it will be
> INVALID.
> >
> > Then when adding a new route which depth is > 24,the tbl8_alloc()
> > function will search the rte_lpm_tbl8_entrys to find INVALID valid_group,
> and it will return the A to the add_depth_big function, so A's data is
> overridden.
> >
> 
> Not sure this message is entirely clear.
> How about:
>   When adding an entry to a tbl8, the .valid_group field should always be set,
>   so that future adds do not accidently find and use this table, thinking it is
>   currently invalid, i.e. unused, and thereby overwrite existing entries.
It is ok for me. 
Nana, what do you think?
> > Signed-off-by: NaNa <nana.nn@alibaba-inc.com>
> >
> > ---
> >  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c |    1 +
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c index
> > 57ec2f0..3981452 100644
> > --- a/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > +++ b/lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.c
> > @@ -769,6 +769,7 @@ delete_depth_small(struct rte_lpm *lpm, uint32_t
> > ip_masked,
> >
> >  		struct rte_lpm_tbl8_entry new_tbl8_entry = {
> >  			.valid = VALID,
> > +			.valid_group = VALID,
> >  			.depth = sub_rule_depth,
> >  			.next_hop = lpm->rules_tbl
> >  			[sub_rule_index].next_hop,
> > --
> > 1.7.7.6
> >

  parent reply	other threads:[~2015-11-02  8:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-30 13:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix two issues in lpm Jijiang Liu
2015-10-30 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] lib/lpm:fix an issue of condition check in delete_depth_small() Jijiang Liu
2015-10-30 14:13   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-30 13:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] lib/lpm:fix an initialization issue of valid_group in the delete_depth_small() Jijiang Liu
2015-10-30 14:22   ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-30 14:24     ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-30 14:31       ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-30 14:56         ` Richardson, Bruce
2015-11-02  8:05     ` Liu, Jijiang [this message]
2015-11-01 18:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Fix two issues in lpm Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02  8:09   ` Liu, Jijiang
2015-11-02  8:25     ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02  8:34       ` Liu, Jijiang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC22BC738D@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=jijiang.liu@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).