DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Eric Kinzie <ehkinzie@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] bond: inherit maximum rx packet length
Date: Fri, 6 May 2016 09:50:46 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1dba6088-f713-c894-793a-115ac10ffab6@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461969005-18106-2-git-send-email-ehkinzie@gmail.com>

CC'ing follow up conversation which I accidentally took of list.

-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bond: inherit maximum rx packet length
Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:11:53 -0400
From: Eric Kinzie <ehkinzie@gmail.com>
To: Declan Doherty <declan.doherty@intel.com>

On Wed May 04 14:53:26 +0100 2016, Declan Doherty wrote:
 > On 29/04/16 22:36, Eric Kinzie wrote:
 > >On Tue Apr 26 11:51:53 +0100 2016, Declan Doherty wrote:
 > >>On 14/04/16 18:23, Eric Kinzie wrote:
 > >>>  Instead of a hard-coded maximum receive length, allow the bond 
interface
 > >>>  to inherit this limit from the first slave added.  This allows
 > >>>  an application that uses jumbo frames to pass realistic values to
 > >>>  rte_eth_dev_configure without causing an error.
 > >>>
 > >>>Signed-off-by: Eric Kinzie <ehkinzie@gmail.com>
 > >>>---
 > >>...
 > >>>
 > >>
 > >>Hey Eric, just one small thing, I think it probably makes sense to
 > >>return the max rx pktlen for all slaves, so as we add each slave
 > >>just check if that the slave being value is larger than the current
 > >>value.
 > >>
 > >>@@ -385,6 +389,10 @@ __eth_bond_slave_add_lock_free(uint8_t
 > >>bonded_port_id, uint8_t slave_port_id)
 > >>                internals->tx_offload_capa &= dev_info.tx_offload_capa;
 > >>                internals->flow_type_rss_offloads &=
 > >>dev_info.flow_type_rss_offloads;
 > >>
 > >>+               /* If new slave's max rx packet size is larger than
 > >>current value then override */
 > >>+               if (dev_info.max_rx_pktlen > internals->max_rx_pktlen)
 > >>+                       internals->max_rx_pktlen = 
dev_info.max_rx_pktlen;
 > >>+
 > >>
 > >>Declan
 > >
 > >Declan, I sent an updated patch but now release that I mis-read your
 > >comments.  Is it a good idea to change the value once it's been set?
 > >My patch now refuses to add a slave with a pktlen value that's smaller
 > >than that of the first slave.
 > >
 > >Eric
 > >
 >
 > Hey Eric,
 >
 > actually I think you're right, we can't change the value dynamically
 > once the bonded device has been configured (maybe gating on
 > start/stop would be sufficient), but I think we shouldn't explicitly
 > gate on the first slave added, as we may be bonding multiple slaves
 > each of which could have different max_rx_pktlens. Prior to calling
 > dev_configure on the bonded device it should be possible to add any
 > slave with any max_rx_pktlen and inherit the minimum value, but once
 > the bonded device has been configured we would refuse a slave with a
 > max_rx_pktlen value which is smaller than the current value. I think
 > this should then satisfy that all slaves meet the minimum
 > requirements published by the bonded device?
 >

Hi, Declan.  I think that would work out ok.  I'll write something to
that effect and send another version of the patch.

  reply	other threads:[~2016-05-06  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14 17:23 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Eric Kinzie
2016-04-26 10:51 ` Declan Doherty
2016-04-29 21:36   ` Eric Kinzie
2016-04-29 22:30   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Eric Kinzie
2016-04-29 22:30   ` Eric Kinzie
2016-05-06  8:50     ` Declan Doherty [this message]
2016-05-07  3:45       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Eric Kinzie
2016-05-07  3:45         ` Eric Kinzie
2016-06-17 14:30           ` Declan Doherty
2016-06-20 16:38             ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1dba6088-f713-c894-793a-115ac10ffab6@intel.com \
    --to=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ehkinzie@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).