DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Hunt, David" <david.hunt@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] eal/arm: add 64-bit armv8 version of rte_memcpy.h
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2015 21:59:12 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151102162911.GC1869@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <563785FD.2080809@intel.com>

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 03:49:17PM +0000, Hunt, David wrote:
> On 02/11/2015 15:36, Jan Viktorin wrote:
> >On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 15:26:19 +0000
> --snip--
> >It was looking like we can share a lot of common code for both
> >architectures. I didn't know how much different are the cpuflags.
> 
> CPU flags for ARMv8 are looking like this now. Quite different to the ARMv7
> ones.
> 
> static const struct feature_entry cpu_feature_table[] = {
>         FEAT_DEF(FP,        0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  0)
>         FEAT_DEF(ASIMD,     0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  1)
>         FEAT_DEF(EVTSTRM,   0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  2)
>         FEAT_DEF(AES,       0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  3)
>         FEAT_DEF(PMULL,     0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  4)
>         FEAT_DEF(SHA1,      0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  5)
>         FEAT_DEF(SHA2,      0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  6)
>         FEAT_DEF(CRC32,     0x00000001, 0, REG_HWCAP,  7)
>         FEAT_DEF(AARCH32,   0x00000001, 0, REG_PLATFORM, 0)
>         FEAT_DEF(AARCH64,   0x00000001, 0, REG_PLATFORM, 1)
> };
> 
> >IMHO, it'd be better to have two directories arm and arm64. I thought
> >to refer from arm64 to arm where possible. But I don't know whether is
> >this possible with the DPDK build system.
> 
> I think both methodologies have their pros and cons. However, I'd lean
> towards the common directory with the "filename_32/64.h" scheme, as that
> similar to the x86 methodology, and we don't need to tweak the include paths
> to pull files from multiple directories.
> 

I agree. Jan, could you please send the next version with
filename_32/64.h for atomic and cpuflags(ie for all header files).
I can re-base and send the complete arm64 patch based on your version.

Thanks,
Jerin



> Dave
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-11-02 16:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-30 13:49 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] ARMv8 additions to ARMv7 support David Hunt
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] eal/arm: add 64-bit armv8 version of rte_memcpy.h David Hunt
2015-11-02  4:57   ` Jerin Jacob
2015-11-02 12:22     ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 12:45       ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 12:57       ` Jerin Jacob
2015-11-02 15:26         ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 15:36           ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-02 15:49             ` Hunt, David
2015-11-02 16:29               ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2015-11-02 17:29                 ` Jan Viktorin
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] eal/arm: add 64-bit armv8 version of rte_prefetch.h David Hunt
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] eal/arm: add 64-bit armv8 version of rte_cycles.h David Hunt
2015-11-02  5:15   ` Jerin Jacob
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] eal/arm: fix 64-bit armv8 compilation of rte_cpuflags.h David Hunt
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] mk: add support for armv8 on top of armv7 David Hunt
2015-11-02  4:43   ` Jerin Jacob
2015-10-30 13:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] test: add checks for cpu flags on armv8 David Hunt

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20151102162911.GC1869@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=david.hunt@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).