From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Panu Matilainen <pmatilai@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Eric Kinzie <ekinzie@brocade.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: fix ABI versioning compile error for combined shared library
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2015 11:33:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20151103113346.GA14881@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56388F46.7040405@redhat.com>
On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 12:41:10PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 11/03/2015 11:20 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 03, 2015 at 09:06:05AM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
>>> On 11/02/2015 05:23 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>>> Fixes following error:
>>>> LD libdpdk.so
>>>> /usr/bin/ld: /root/dpdk/build/lib/libdpdk.so: version node not found
>>>> for symbol <function>@DPDK_x.y
>>>>
>>>> Defines version symbols in a fixed path libdpdk.map file and this
>>>> value hardcoded into makefile
>>>
>>> Hold on. What problem is this supposed to be fixing?
>> This patch is to fix combined library compilation error when ABI versining used.
>> Currently if ABI version macros used (VERSION_SYMBOL), we are not able to compile combined shared library.
>>
>>> If its for the bonding thing (as it'd appear from the threading), NAK.
>> Nothing directly related to the bonding, just issue observed in this thread.
>
> Okay, understood, it was just not clear from the description. Since there
> are no users of VERSION_SYMBOL etc macros this error has not come up until
> now.
>
>>
>>> The symbol versioning in
>>> that patch is confused needs to be fixed there instead of inventing strange
>>> workarounds elsewhere.
>>>
>> This is not intented to be a workaround but a fix, unless you have a better idea.
>
> The problem is, it undoes the other benefit of symbol versioning: hiding the
> internal symbols. So in my eyes its more of a hack or a workaround than a
> fix.
>
> I'd much much rather see this as a solution:
> http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/4262/
>
What I observed from this, how/why combined library should be generated is under question, from that perspective I agree this patch is a hack.
If current method is used, this patch just fixes compile error, also patch is not related to versioning in combined library, which is still broken.
Thanks,
ferruh
> - Panu -
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-03 11:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-10-19 15:36 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] bonding corrections and additions Eric Kinzie
2015-10-19 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/4] bond mode 4: copy entire config structure Eric Kinzie
2015-10-19 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/4] bond mode 4: do not ignore multicast Eric Kinzie
2015-10-19 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] bond mode 4: allow external state machine Eric Kinzie
2015-11-01 18:17 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-01 23:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix ABI versioning compile error for combined shared library Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-01 23:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02 0:05 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-02 7:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02 10:20 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-02 15:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-02 16:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-02 19:18 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-03 7:06 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-03 9:20 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-03 10:41 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-03 11:33 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2015-11-03 11:43 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-06 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-06 13:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-02 10:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/4] bond mode 4: allow external state machine Panu Matilainen
2015-11-02 16:42 ` Eric Kinzie
2015-11-03 6:48 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-03 8:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-03 8:30 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-03 9:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-11-03 17:12 ` Eric Kinzie
2015-11-03 11:02 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-03 11:31 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-11-03 11:48 ` Ferruh Yigit
2015-11-20 19:46 ` Eric Kinzie
2015-11-24 14:52 ` Panu Matilainen
2015-10-19 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/4] bond mode 4: tests for " Eric Kinzie
2015-10-19 16:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/4] bonding corrections and additions Declan Doherty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20151103113346.GA14881@sivlogin002.ir.intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ekinzie@brocade.com \
--cc=pmatilai@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).