DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yuanhan Liu <yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com>
To: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/14] virtio: pci: extend virtio pci rw api for vfio interface
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:27:26 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160115062726.GS19531@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1452778117-30178-9-git-send-email-sshukla@mvista.com>

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 06:58:31PM +0530, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> So far virtio handle rw access for uio / ioport interface, This patch to extend
> the support for vfio interface. For that introducing private struct
> virtio_vfio_dev{
> 	- is_vfio
> 	- pci_dev
> 	};
> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shukla <sshukla@mvista.com>
...
> +/* For vfio only */
> +struct virtio_vfio_dev {
> +	bool		is_vfio;	/* True: vfio i/f,
> +					 * False: not a vfio i/f

Well, this is weird; you are adding a flag to tell whether it's a
vfio device __inside__ a vfio struct.

Back to the topic, this flag is not necessary to me: you can
check the pci_dev->kdrv flag.

> +					 */
> +	struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev; /* vfio dev */

Note that I have already added this field into virtio_hw struct
at my latest virtio 1.0 pmd patchset.

While I told you before that you should not develop patches based
on my patcheset, I guess you can do that now. Since it should be
in good shape and close to be merged.

> +};
> +
>  struct virtio_hw {
>  	struct virtqueue *cvq;
>  	uint32_t    io_base;
> @@ -176,6 +186,7 @@ struct virtio_hw {
>  	uint8_t	    use_msix;
>  	uint8_t     started;
>  	uint8_t     mac_addr[ETHER_ADDR_LEN];
> +	struct virtio_vfio_dev dev;
>  };
>  
>  /*
> @@ -231,20 +242,65 @@ outl_p(unsigned int data, unsigned int port)
>  #define VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR(hw, reg) \
>  	(unsigned short)((hw)->io_base + (reg))
>  
> -#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_1(hw, reg) \
> -	inb((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
> -#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_1(hw, reg, value) \
> -	outb_p((unsigned char)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
> -
> -#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_2(hw, reg) \
> -	inw((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
> -#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_2(hw, reg, value) \
> -	outw_p((unsigned short)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
> -
> -#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_4(hw, reg) \
> -	inl((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
> -#define VIRTIO_WRITE_REG_4(hw, reg, value) \
> -	outl_p((unsigned int)(value), (VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg))))
> +#define VIRTIO_READ_REG_1(hw, reg)					\
> +({									\
> +	uint8_t ret;							\
> +	struct virtio_vfio_dev *vdev;					\
> +	(vdev) = (&(hw)->dev);						\
> +	(((vdev)->is_vfio) ?						\
> +	(ioport_inb(((vdev)->pci_dev), reg, &ret)) :			\
> +	((ret) = (inb((VIRTIO_PCI_REG_ADDR((hw), (reg)))))));		\
> +	ret;								\
> +})

It becomes unreadable. I'd suggest to define them as iniline
functions, and use "if .. else .." instead of "?:".

	--yliu

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-15  6:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-14 13:28 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/14] Add virtio support for arm/arm64 Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/14] virtio: Introduce config RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15  6:51   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-16  6:18     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/14] config: i686: set RTE_VIRTIO_INC_VECTOR=n Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/14] linuxapp: eal: arm: Always return 0 for rte_eal_iopl_init() Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/14] linuxapp/vfio: ignore mapping for ioport region Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/14] virtio_pci.h: build fix for sys/io.h for non-x86 arch Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/14] eal: pci: vfio: add rd/wr func for pci bar space Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15  5:48   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-16  8:06     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/14] virtio: vfio: add api support to rd/wr ioport bar Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15  6:03   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-16  8:53     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/14] virtio: pci: extend virtio pci rw api for vfio interface Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15  6:27   ` Yuanhan Liu [this message]
2016-01-15 12:43     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15 13:42       ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-18  6:11         ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-18  6:45           ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-18  7:17             ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-18 13:09               ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-18  6:59   ` Jason Wang
2016-01-18  7:39     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/14] virtio: ethdev: check " Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15  6:35   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-15 12:37     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/14] virtio: pci: add dummy func definition for in/outb for non-x86 arch Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/14] config: armv7/v8: Enable RTE_LIBRTE_VIRTIO_PMD Santosh Shukla
2016-01-15  6:37   ` Yuanhan Liu
2016-01-15 12:45     ` Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/14] eal: pci: export pci_[un]map_device Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 13/14] virtio: enable vfio in pmd driver Santosh Shukla
2016-01-14 13:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 14/14] vfio: Support for no-IOMMU mode Santosh Shukla
2016-01-29  7:27 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/14] Add virtio support for arm/arm64 Xie, Huawei
2016-01-29  9:19   ` Santosh Shukla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160115062726.GS19531@yliu-dev.sh.intel.com \
    --to=yuanhan.liu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=sshukla@mvista.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).