DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: "Kobylinski, MichalX" <michalx.kobylinski@intel.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"viktorin@rehivetech.com" <viktorin@rehivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 22:14:10 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160216164408.GA10571@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <987EE72691933347B9F0B5C19E71B5BB1F02C6E3@IRSMSX101.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 01:27:02PM +0000, Kobylinski, MichalX wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > Sent: Friday, February 12, 2016 1:29 PM
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
> > Cc: viktorin@rehivetech.com
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON
> > 
[snip]
> > 
> > Jerin Jacob (3):
> >   lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic
> >   lpm: add support for NEON
> >   maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and
> >     lpm
> > 
> >  MAINTAINERS                                |   3 +
> >  app/test/test_lpm.c                        |  21 ++--
> >  app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h                   |  67 +++++++++++++
> >  config/defconfig_arm-armv7a-linuxapp-gcc   |   3 -
> >  config/defconfig_arm64-armv8a-linuxapp-gcc |   3 -
> >  lib/librte_lpm/Makefile                    |   6 ++
> >  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm.h                   |  99 ++-----------------
> >  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h              | 148 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h               | 143 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  9 files changed, 386 insertions(+), 107 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
> > app/test/test_xmmt_ops.h  create mode 100644 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_neon.h
> > create mode 100644 lib/librte_lpm/rte_lpm_sse.h
> > 
> > --
> > 2.1.0
> 
> Hi Jerin,

Hi Michal,

> Are you planning increase next_hop field for ARM? I extended next_hop field from 8 bits to 24 bits and created structure to configure LPM for x86.

Yes, I am planning to increase next_hop field for ARM as a separate
patch.  Let this base patchset get merges.

I will make  ARM specific changes for your new feature in
'rte_lpm_lookupx4' as a separate patch on top of your series.
So that in case if I want to go back to 8 bit then I can do it

Jerin

> Please look at my patchset with proposal increase next_hop field and structure to configure.
> 
> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10249/
> http://patchwork.dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10250/
> 
> Best Regards,
> Michal
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2016-02-16 16:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-11-30 17:24 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Jerin Jacob
2015-11-30 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eal: introduce rte_vect_* abstractions Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43   ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:51     ` Jerin Jacob
2015-11-30 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43   ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:56     ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 15:00       ` Jan Viktorin
2015-11-30 17:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43   ` Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:57     ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-02 13:43 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jan Viktorin
2015-12-02 14:41   ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-04 15:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Jerin Jacob
2015-12-04 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2015-12-07  6:15     ` Jianbo Liu
2015-12-07  6:57       ` Jerin Jacob
2015-12-07 14:06     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-12-04 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2015-12-04 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2016-01-29  4:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-01-29  4:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2016-01-29  4:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-02-11 11:46       ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-02-12  6:47         ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12  8:42           ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-01-29  4:10     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2016-02-08  9:29     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2016-03-01 17:42         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02  6:28           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-03-01 17:46         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02  6:45           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-12 12:28       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash and lpm Jerin Jacob
2016-03-01 17:47         ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-02  6:46           ` Jerin Jacob
2016-02-16 13:27       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Kobylinski, MichalX
2016-02-16 16:44         ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2016-02-18 10:26           ` Kobylinski, MichalX
2016-02-19  0:34             ` Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11  3:52       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11  3:52         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] lpm: make rte_lpm_lookupx4 API definition architecture agnostic Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11  3:52         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] lpm: add support for NEON Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11  3:52         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] Maintainers: claim responsibility for arm64 specific files of hash Jerin Jacob
2016-03-11 14:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] add lpm support for NEON Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160216164408.GA10571@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=michalx.kobylinski@intel.com \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).