DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org,
	"Nicolás Pernas Maradei" <nicolas.pernas.maradei@emutex.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] ring: remove duplicate fields in internal data struct
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:26:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160223152654.GC17644@bricha3-MOBL3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1455794803-20383-3-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com>

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 11:26:42AM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> 1- Remove duplicate nb_rx/tx_queues fields from internals
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c b/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c
> index d92b088..fd87999 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c
> @@ -59,9 +59,6 @@ struct ring_queue {
>  };
>  
>  struct pmd_internals {
> -	unsigned nb_rx_queues;
> -	unsigned nb_tx_queues;
> -
>  	struct ring_queue rx_ring_queues[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_RX_RINGS];
>  	struct ring_queue tx_ring_queues[RTE_PMD_RING_MAX_TX_RINGS];
>  
> @@ -138,7 +135,7 @@ eth_dev_set_link_up(struct rte_eth_dev *dev)
>  }
>  
>  static int
> -eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> +eth_rx_queue_setup(struct rte_eth_dev *dev, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
>  				    uint16_t nb_rx_desc __rte_unused,
>  				    unsigned int socket_id __rte_unused,
>  				    const struct rte_eth_rxconf *rx_conf __rte_unused,
> @@ -165,40 +162,39 @@ static void
>  eth_dev_info(struct rte_eth_dev *dev,
>  		struct rte_eth_dev_info *dev_info)
>  {
> -	struct pmd_internals *internals = dev->data->dev_private;
>  	dev_info->driver_name = drivername;
>  	dev_info->max_mac_addrs = 1;
>  	dev_info->max_rx_pktlen = (uint32_t)-1;
> -	dev_info->max_rx_queues = (uint16_t)internals->nb_rx_queues;
> -	dev_info->max_tx_queues = (uint16_t)internals->nb_tx_queues;
> +	dev_info->max_rx_queues = dev->data->nb_rx_queues;
> +	dev_info->max_tx_queues = dev->data->nb_tx_queues;

I'm still not convined this is correct. What happens if a ring PMD is created
with 16 queues (i.e. backed by 16 rings), and then the user uses
rte_eth_dev_configure to only actually use 4 queues. The fact that the internal
array still has 16 queues will be lost, and the device will only ever report
4 as the max number it can support.

Regards,
/Bruce

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-02-23 15:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-29 17:16 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] clean-up on virtual PMDs Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-29 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] pcap: remove duplicate fields in internal data struct Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-29 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] ring: " Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-17 17:36   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-18  9:50     ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-01-29 17:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] null: " Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-03  6:21   ` Tetsuya Mukawa
2016-02-18 11:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/3] clean-up on virtual PMDs Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-18 11:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/3] pcap: remove duplicate fields in internal data struct Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-22  9:54     ` Nicolas Pernas Maradei
2016-02-18 11:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/3] ring: " Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-22  9:55     ` Nicolas Pernas Maradei
2016-02-23 15:26     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2016-02-23 15:58       ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-23 16:06         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-18 11:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/3] null: " Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-22  9:56     ` Nicolas Pernas Maradei
2016-02-26 15:26   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] clean-up on virtual PMDs Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 15:26     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] pcap: remove duplicate fields in internal data struct Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 15:26     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] ring: rename " Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 16:35       ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-26 15:26     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] null: remove duplicate " Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 16:58     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] clean-up on virtual PMDs Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 16:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] pcap: remove duplicate fields in internal data struct Ferruh Yigit
2016-02-26 16:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] ring: variable rename and code cleanup Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-10 11:11         ` Bruce Richardson
2016-02-26 16:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] null: remove duplicate fields in internal data struct Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-10 11:12       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] clean-up on virtual PMDs Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160223152654.GC17644@bricha3-MOBL3 \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=nicolas.pernas.maradei@emutex.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).