DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Nélio Laranjeiro" <nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] net/mlx5: performance improvement
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 09:25:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160920072541.GS32397@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160919161733.GK45548@bricha3-MOBL3>

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 05:17:34PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:18:01PM +0200, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> >  - Rework structure elements to reduce their size.
> >  - Removes a second useless loop in Tx burst function.
> > 
> > This series should be applied on top of "net/mlx5: various fixes".
> > 
> > Changes in v2:
> > 
> >  - rework serie to apply it on top of "net/mlx5: various fixes".
> > 
> > Nelio Laranjeiro (6):
> >   net/mlx5: rework hardware structures
> >   net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx structure size
> >   net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx structure size
> >   net/mlx5: reduce Tx structure size
> >   net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx structure size
> >   net/mlx5: remove gather loop on segments
> > 
> Three of the patches in this set have the same title, which seems a lot.
> Can you expand the titles in some way to make them a little different and help
> those browsing the commit short-logs?
> 
> /Bruce

Sure, It will be updated in v3.

Regards,

-- 
Nélio Laranjeiro
6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2016-09-20  7:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-09-07  7:09 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-07  7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] net/mlx5: rework hardware structures Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-07  7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx structure size Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-07  7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-07  7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] net/mlx5: reduce Tx " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-07  7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-07  7:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] net/mlx5: remove gather loop on segments Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/6] net/mlx5: performance improvement Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-19 16:17   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-09-20  7:25     ` Nélio Laranjeiro [this message]
2016-09-20  8:53   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-20  8:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/6] net/mlx5: rework hardware structures Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-20  8:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/6] net/mlx5: reduce memory overhead of Rx/Tx descriptors Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-20  8:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/6] net/mlx5: reduce memory overhead for CQE handling Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-20  8:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/6] net/mlx5: reduce memory overhead for BF handling Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-20  8:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/6] net/mlx5: reduce memory overhead for WQE handling Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-20  8:53     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/6] net/mlx5: remove gather loop on segments Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-21 10:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/6] net/mlx5: performance improvement Bruce Richardson
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/6] net/mlx5: rework hardware structures Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-19 16:14   ` Bruce Richardson
2016-09-20  7:09     ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/6] net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx structure size Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/6] " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/6] net/mlx5: reduce Tx " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/6] net/mlx5: reduce Tx and Rx " Nelio Laranjeiro
2016-09-14 12:18 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/6] net/mlx5: remove gather loop on segments Nelio Laranjeiro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160920072541.GS32397@autoinstall.dev.6wind.com \
    --to=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).