DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: "Mcnamara, John" <john.mcnamara@intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>,
	Zhigang Lu <zlu@ezchip.com>, Liming Sun <lsun@ezchip.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce TILE-Gx removal
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2017 11:25:12 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170214112512.GA28908@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B27915DBBA3421428155699D51E4CFE2026CBA88@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com>

On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:50:07AM +0000, Mcnamara, John wrote:
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2017 10:53 AM
> > To: Zhigang Lu <zlu@ezchip.com>; Liming Sun <lsun@ezchip.com>
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] doc: announce TILE-Gx removal
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
> > ---
> >  doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst | 3 +++
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > index b49e0a0..d40b137 100644
> > --- a/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > +++ b/doc/guides/rel_notes/deprecation.rst
> > @@ -62,3 +62,6 @@ Deprecation Notices
> >    PMDs that implement the latter.
> >    Target release for removal of the legacy API will be defined once most
> >    PMDs have switched to rte_flow.
> > +
> > +* The architecture TILE-Gx and the associated mpipe driver are not
> > +  maintained and will be removed in 17.05.
> 
> The notification should probably be for removal in 17.08, to one release cycle to respond/fix/update.
> 
> It would also be good to hear from EZChip/Mellanox on this.
> 
> John

If - as seems likely - this deprecation notice makes it into the 17.02
release, I would just ask that the actual removal of the code *not* take
place at the start of the 17.05 release cycle, to be sure to give
further additional grace period for someone to respond to this. I think
it is only fair to wait till just before the RC's are produced to remove
the code, given it is such a drastic step, and the official notice of
removal is only inserted right before 17.02 goes out.

Regards,
/Bruce

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-02-14 11:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-13 10:52 Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-14  8:50 ` Mcnamara, John
2017-02-14  8:58   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-14  9:28     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-02-14 10:50       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-02-14 10:56         ` Jerin Jacob
2017-02-14 11:03         ` Olivier Matz
2017-02-14 13:34       ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-02-14 11:25   ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2017-02-14 11:51     ` Mcnamara, John
2017-02-14 18:38 ` [dpdk-dev] " Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170214112512.GA28908@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
    --cc=lsun@ezchip.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=zlu@ezchip.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).