DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas.monjalon@6wind.com, robin.jarry@6wind.com,
	jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, keith.wiles@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] mk: optimize directory dependencies
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 14:11:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170330141120.2dbefae4@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b0468d8f-600f-fd55-bef3-3ca26dff68ce@intel.com>

On Thu, 30 Mar 2017 10:27:49 +0100, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> On 3/30/2017 9:51 AM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > Hi Ferruh,
> > 
> > On Tue, 28 Mar 2017 11:34:35 +0100, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:  
> >> On 3/24/2017 1:21 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:  
> >>> Before this patch, the management of dependencies between directories
> >>> had several issues:
> >>>
> >>> - the generation of .depdirs, done at configuration is slow: it can take
> >>>   more than one minute on some slow targets (usually ~10s on a standard
> >>>   PC without -j).
> >>>
> >>> - for instance, it is possible to express a dependency like:
> >>>   - app/foo depends on lib/librte_foo
> >>>   - and lib/librte_foo depends on app/bar
> >>>   But this won't work because the directories are traversed with a
> >>>   depth-first algorithm, so we have to choose between doing 'app' before
> >>>   or after 'lib'.
> >>>
> >>> - the script depdirs-rule.sh is too complex.
> >>>
> >>> - we cannot use "make -d" for debug, because the output of make is used for
> >>>   the generation of .depdirs.
> >>>
> >>> This patch moves the DEPDIRS-* variables in the upper Makefile, making
> >>> the dependencies much easier to calculate. A DEPDIRS variable is still
> >>> used to process library dependencies in LDLIBS.
> >>>
> >>> After this commit, "make config" is almost immediate.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Robin Jarry <robin.jarry@6wind.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>    
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>  
> >>>  DIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PORT) += librte_port
> >>> +DEPDIRS-librte_port := librte_eal librte_mbuf librte_mempool librte_ether
> >>> +DEPDIRS-librte_port += librte_ip_frag librte_sched librte_kni    
> >>                                                          ^
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------+
> >>
> >> <...>
> >>  
> >>> diff --git a/lib/librte_port/Makefile b/lib/librte_port/Makefile
> >>> index 44fa73520..76629a13a 100644
> >>> --- a/lib/librte_port/Makefile
> >>> +++ b/lib/librte_port/Makefile    
> >> <...>  
> >>> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_KNI),y)
> >>> -DEPDIRS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_PORT) += lib/librte_kni
> >>> -endif    
> >>
> >> This check needs to be reflected to new method, otherwise causing build
> >> errors for i686 target.
> >>  
> > 
> > Did you notice an error? I see no error it with:
> > 
> >     make config T=x86_64-native-linuxapp-gcc
> >     sed -i 's,CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_KNI=y,# CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_KNI is not set,' build/.config
> >     make -j8
> > 
> > 
> > I think it is not a problem, the DEPDIRS-* variable only gives an
> > ordering directive, which should be ok even if kni is not compiled.  
> 
> Can you please test shared library build, I am getting following error:
> 
> == Build lib/librte_port
>   LD librte_port.so.3.1
> /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lrte_kni
> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
> .../mk/rte.lib.mk:127: recipe for target 'librte_port.so.3.1' failed
> make[3]: *** [librte_port.so.3.1] Error 1
> .../mk/rte.subdir.mk:63: recipe for target 'librte_port' failed
> 

You're right, it happens because the libray list is built from DEPDIRS.

Thanks for spotting it, I'll check if there are other occurences and send
a fix. The simple way is probably to restore the ifeq(), but I'm wondering
if having: DEPDIRS-$(cond)-$(path) wouldn't be shorter in Makefiles.

Olivier

  reply	other threads:[~2017-03-30 12:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-22  1:50 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: parallelize make config Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-23 17:18 ` Olivier Matz
2017-01-23 17:19   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: optimize directory dependencies Olivier Matz
2017-01-24 11:19     ` Robin Jarry
2017-01-24 11:26       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-01-24 12:31         ` Robin Jarry
2017-01-24 11:40     ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-24 12:15       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-01-24 12:56         ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-24 13:26           ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-01-24 14:50             ` Olivier MATZ
2017-01-24 14:55               ` Wiles, Keith
2017-03-01 11:25                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-01 12:10                   ` Bruce Richardson
2017-03-01 12:30                   ` Olivier Matz
2017-01-24 13:05     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-17 17:13     ` Olivier Matz
2017-03-17 17:47       ` Robin Jarry
2017-03-20  8:31         ` Olivier Matz
2017-03-24 13:21       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Olivier Matz
2017-03-27 21:33         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-03-28 10:34         ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-30  8:51           ` Olivier Matz
2017-03-30  9:27             ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-30 12:11               ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2017-03-30 12:32                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: fix dependencies to optional configs Olivier Matz
2017-03-30 12:37                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-03-30 13:37                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-23 17:50   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: parallelize make config Wiles, Keith
2017-01-24  8:42     ` Olivier MATZ
2017-01-24 10:02       ` Bruce Richardson
2017-01-23 19:03 ` Michał Mirosław
2017-01-30  9:41   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-24 10:52 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-01-29 15:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-30  9:46   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-30 10:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-30 18:13   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170330141120.2dbefae4@platinum \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=robin.jarry@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).