DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] eal: redefine logtype values
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2017 14:15:27 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170419141527.26db741e@glumotte.dev.6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1492601044-27217-1-git-send-email-pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>

Hi Pablo,

On Wed, 19 Apr 2017 12:24:04 +0100, Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com> wrote:
> After the changes in commit c1b5fa94a46f
> ("eal: support dynamic log types"), logtype is not treated as a
> bitmask, but a decimal value. Therefore, values have to be
> converted.
> 
> Fixes: c1b5fa94a46f ("eal: support dynamic log types")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pablo de Lara <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> ---
> 
> Changes in v4:
> - Moved log type strings to eal_common_log.c
> 
> Changes in v3:
> - Created array of structures containing logtype id and string
> - Added left shift to convert new decimal values to bitmask for backward compatibility
> 
> Changes in v2:
> - Used new RTE_LOGTYPE values in rte_log_init()
> 
>  lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c  | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/rte_log.h | 58 +++++++++++++-------------
>  2 files changed, 73 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> index dd4d30c..fd76612 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_log.c
> @@ -118,9 +118,9 @@ rte_set_log_type(uint32_t type, int enable)
>  {
>  	if (type < RTE_LOGTYPE_FIRST_EXT_ID) {
>  		if (enable)
> -			rte_logs.type |= type;
> +			rte_logs.type |= 1 << type;
>  		else
> -			rte_logs.type &= ~type;
> +			rte_logs.type &= ~(1 << type);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (enable)
> @@ -240,42 +240,57 @@ rte_log_register(const char *name)
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +struct logtype {
> +	uint32_t log_id;
> +	char logtype[32];
> +};

Sorry I missed it in the previous review, but what do you think of
using "const char *" instead of "char[32]"?

  reply	other threads:[~2017-04-19 12:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-04-12 14:14 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Pablo de Lara
2017-04-12 15:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-04-12 15:22   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-12 15:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Pablo de Lara
2017-04-12 19:23   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-04-13  8:32     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-13  9:09       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-12 21:41   ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-04-13 13:43     ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-13 13:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Pablo de Lara
2017-04-18  9:57     ` Olivier MATZ
2017-04-19 11:12       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-19 11:22     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Pablo de Lara
2017-04-19 11:23       ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-19 11:24     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Pablo de Lara
2017-04-19 12:15       ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2017-04-19 13:46         ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-04-19 14:06       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Pablo de Lara
2017-04-19 14:16         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-04-19 22:49           ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170419141527.26db741e@glumotte.dev.6wind.com \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).