From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net, keith.wiles@intel.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] service cores: add unit tests
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2017 16:44:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170704111410.GA13340@jerin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1499031314-7172-5-git-send-email-harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
-----Original Message-----
> Date: Sun, 2 Jul 2017 22:35:11 +0100
> From: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> CC: jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, thomas@monjalon.net,
> keith.wiles@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com, Harry van Haaren
> <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v3 4/7] service cores: add unit tests
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.4
>
> Add a bunch of unit tests, to ensure that the service
> core functions are operating as expected.
>
> As part of these tests a dummy service is registered which
> allows identifying if a service callback has been invoked
> by using the CPU tick counter. This allows identifying if
> functions to start and stop service lcores are actually having
> effect.
>
> Signed-off-by: Harry van Haaren <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>
>
> ---
>
> v2 changes;
> - Rename variable to slcore_id (Jerin)
> - Rename function to unregister_all() (Jerin)
> - Fix typos (Jerin)
> - Add unit test for get_by_name()
> - Add unit tests (all suggestions by Jerin)
> -- get_name()
> -- Verify probe_capability API
> -- Verify MT_SAFE capability (see code for details)
> -- Verify rte_service_dump() API
I think now UT is addressing all the APIS.
A few comments below.
> ---
> +testsuite_setup(void)
> +{
> + /* assuming lcore 1 is available for service-core testing */
> + slcore_id = 1;
Rather than assuming, How about taking enabled lcore for testing using
rte_get_next_lcore()?
dummy_mt_safe_cb() tests using the second lcore now. So I think, you can
the get the enabled lcore for MT_SAFE using rte_get_next_lcore() and exit
if two lcores not available.
> + return TEST_SUCCESS;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static struct unit_test_suite service_tests = {
> + .suite_name = "service core test suite",
> + .setup = testsuite_setup,
> + .teardown = testsuite_teardown,
> + .unit_test_cases = {
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, unregister_all),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_name),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_get_by_name),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_dump),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_probe_capability),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_start_stop),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_lcore_add_del),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_lcore_start_stop),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_lcore_en_dis_able),
> + TEST_CASE_ST(dummy_register, NULL, service_mt_safe_poll),
> + TEST_CASES_END() /**< NULL terminate unit test array */
Regarding "Moving service lcore to/from rte lcore back and forth" test
reply in
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/25655/
I was thinking to enable the test by, calling service_lcore_del() and
then call remote launch on that lcore to check it is properly in
ROLE_RTE state. How about adding a test for the same to make sure the
"Moving service lcore to/from rte lcore back and forth" is OK.
With above comments:
Acked-by: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
> + }
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +test_service_common(void)
> +{
> + return unit_test_suite_runner(&service_tests);
> +}
> +
> +REGISTER_TEST_COMMAND(service_autotest, test_service_common);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-04 11:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 82+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-23 9:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] service cores: header and implementation Harry van Haaren
2017-06-23 9:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/6] service cores: coremask parsing Harry van Haaren
2017-06-26 12:49 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-29 11:13 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-06-23 9:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/6] service cores: EAL init changes Harry van Haaren
2017-06-26 12:55 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-29 11:13 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-06-23 9:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/6] service cores: mark cores in lcore config as RTE Harry van Haaren
2017-06-23 9:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/6] service core: add unit tests Harry van Haaren
2017-06-26 13:06 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-29 11:14 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-06-23 9:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/6] service cores: enable event/sw with service Harry van Haaren
2017-06-26 13:46 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-29 11:15 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-06-26 11:59 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/6] service cores: header and implementation Jerin Jacob
2017-06-29 11:13 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-06-29 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] service cores: cover letter Harry van Haaren
2017-06-29 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] service cores: header and implementation Harry van Haaren
2017-06-29 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] service cores: EAL init changes Harry van Haaren
2017-06-29 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] service cores: coremask parsing Harry van Haaren
2017-06-29 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] service cores: add unit tests Harry van Haaren
2017-06-29 11:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] service cores: enable event/sw with service Harry van Haaren
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/7] service cores: cover letter Harry van Haaren
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/7] service cores: header and implementation Harry van Haaren
2017-07-04 17:16 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/7] service cores: EAL init changes Harry van Haaren
2017-07-04 11:35 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-07 16:28 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/7] service cores: coremask parsing Harry van Haaren
2017-07-04 12:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-06 14:47 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-07 10:45 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-07 10:57 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/7] service cores: add unit tests Harry van Haaren
2017-07-04 11:14 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/7] service cores: enable event/sw with service Harry van Haaren
2017-07-04 10:52 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-07 16:28 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/7] maintainers: claim service cores Harry van Haaren
2017-07-04 10:53 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-02 21:35 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/7] doc: add service cores to doc and release notes Harry van Haaren
2017-07-02 22:16 ` Mcnamara, John
2017-07-04 10:56 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] service cores: cover letter Harry van Haaren
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/7] service cores: header and implementation Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 8:29 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-11 9:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-11 12:32 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-11 12:44 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-11 12:49 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-11 14:10 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/7] service cores: EAL init changes Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 7:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-11 14:11 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/7] service cores: coremask parsing Harry van Haaren
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/7] service cores: add unit tests Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 8:12 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/7] event/sw: enable SW PMD with service capability Harry van Haaren
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/7] doc: add service cores to doc and release notes Harry van Haaren
2017-07-07 16:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/7] maintainers: claim service cores Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 7:53 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-09 22:08 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/7] service cores: cover letter Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 8:18 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-10 11:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/7] service cores: header and implementation Harry van Haaren
2017-07-12 16:35 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/7] service cores: EAL init changes Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/7] service cores: coremask parsing Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/7] service cores: add unit tests Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/7] event/sw: enable SW PMD with service capability Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/7] doc: add service cores to doc and release notes Harry van Haaren
2017-07-11 14:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/7] maintainers: claim service cores Harry van Haaren
2017-07-12 16:49 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/7] service cores: cover letter Jerin Jacob
2017-07-16 19:25 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-17 8:07 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-17 15:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] service: add corelist to EAL arguments Harry van Haaren
2017-07-17 15:53 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-07-17 15:58 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-17 16:10 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-07-17 16:16 ` Van Haaren, Harry
2017-07-19 5:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170704111410.GA13340@jerin \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=harry.van.haaren@intel.com \
--cc=keith.wiles@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).