DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Cristian Dumitrescu <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
	hemant.agrawal@nxp.com, jasvinder.singh@intel.com,
	wenzhuo.lu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [pull-request] next-tm 17.08 pre-rc1
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2017 09:43:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170710074317.GR19852@6wind.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1838852.sCttUoyffy@xps>

Hi Thomas,

On Sun, Jul 09, 2017 at 10:01:31PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 04/07/2017 17:38, Cristian Dumitrescu:
> >   http://dpdk.org/git/next/dpdk-next-tm 
> 
> I'm sorry to not have considered this tree as a high priority.
> I think it may be integrated in RC2 because it is a totally new area
> and should not break any existing code.
> 
> I prefer to wait because I have seen some things to fix:
> 
> 1/ There is a compilation error with clang (notified in related thread).
> 
> 2/ Some functions are exposed in the API to query the ops.
> It seems dangerous and useless:
> 	- rte_eth_dev_tm_ops_get
> 	- rte_tm_ops_get
> 
> 3/ The PMD interface file is referenced in the doxygen index:
> +  [rte_tm_driver]      (@ref rte_tm_driver.h),
> I see that rte_flow_driver.h is also referenced but it seems a mistake.

Why? It was done on purpose, I think exposing through Doxygen internal APIs
implemented by drivers must be a requirement, even if the exposed symbols
are not necessarily versioned.

-- 
Adrien Mazarguil
6WIND

  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-10  7:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-04 15:38 Cristian Dumitrescu
2017-07-04 15:47 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-04 16:52   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-04 20:21     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-05 10:36       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-09 20:01 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10  7:43   ` Adrien Mazarguil [this message]
2017-07-10  7:51     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 10:55   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 12:57     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 13:21       ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 13:49         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 15:46           ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 15:54             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-10 16:47               ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-10 16:58                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-07-11 18:20                   ` Dumitrescu, Cristian
2017-07-12 17:33                     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170710074317.GR19852@6wind.com \
    --to=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jasvinder.singh@intel.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).