From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: bruce.richardson@intel.com, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com,
daniel.verkamp@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ring: relax alignment constraint on ring structure
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 10:52:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170720105248.7f9b1ec1@platinum> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170630142609.6180-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Jun 2017 16:26:09 +0200, Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com> wrote:
> The initial objective of
> commit d9f0d3a1ffd4 ("ring: remove split cacheline build setting")
> was to add an empty cache line betwee, the producer and consumer
> data (on platform with cache line size = 64B), preventing from
> having them on adjacent cache lines.
>
> Following discussion on the mailing list, it appears that this
> also imposes an alignment constraint that is not required.
>
> This patch removes the extra alignment constraint and adds the
> empty cache lines using padding fields in the structure. The
> size of rte_ring structure and the offset of the fields remain
> the same on platforms with cache line size = 64B:
>
> rte_ring = 384
> rte_ring.name = 0
> rte_ring.flags = 32
> rte_ring.memzone = 40
> rte_ring.size = 48
> rte_ring.mask = 52
> rte_ring.prod = 128
> rte_ring.cons = 256
>
> But it has an impact on platform where cache line size is 128B:
>
> rte_ring = 384 -> 768
> rte_ring.name = 0
> rte_ring.flags = 32
> rte_ring.memzone = 40
> rte_ring.size = 48
> rte_ring.mask = 52
> rte_ring.prod = 128 -> 256
> rte_ring.cons = 256 -> 512
>
> Link: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/25039/
> Suggested-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> ---
>
> I'm sending this patch to throw the discussion again, but since it
> breaks the ABI on platform with cache lines = 128B, I think we should
> follow the usual ABI breakage process.
>
> If everybody agree, I'll send a notice and resend a similar patch after
> 17.08.
>
If there is no comment, I'll send a deprecation notice in the
coming days.
Thanks,
Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-20 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 14:26 Olivier Matz
2017-07-20 8:52 ` Olivier Matz [this message]
2018-04-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 15:07 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-03 15:25 ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 15:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-03 15:56 ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 16:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-04 23:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-05 8:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-05 13:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-06 1:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-11 0:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-11 2:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-11 8:40 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-17 22:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-25 10:59 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-25 12:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-25 14:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-25 15:17 ` Olivier Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20170720105248.7f9b1ec1@platinum \
--to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.verkamp@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).