DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
To: Sergio Gonzalez Monroy <sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com>
Cc: Santosh Shukla <santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, thomas@monjalon.net,
	jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, hemant.agrawal@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle
Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2017 15:34:55 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20170904133437.ym3cd7n3dswt4yjb@neon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5724dc82-952a-8ca5-2f99-f463a54ec07d@intel.com>

Hi Sergio,

On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 10:41:56AM +0100, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy wrote:
> On 15/08/2017 09:07, Santosh Shukla wrote:
> > v3:
> >   - Rebased on top of v17.11-rc0
> >   - Updated version.map entry to v17.11.
> > 
> > v2:
> > 
> > DPDK has support for hw and sw mempool. Those mempool
> > can work optimal for specific PMD's.
> > Example:
> > sw ring based PMD for Intel NICs.
> > HW mempool manager dpaa2 for dpaa2 PMD.
> > HW mempool manager fpa for octeontx PMD.
> > 
> > There could be a use-case where different vendor NIC's used
> > on the same platform and User like to configure mempool in such a way that
> > each of those NIC's should use their preferred mempool(For performance reasons).
> > 
> > Current mempool infrastrucure don't support such use-case.
> > 
> > This patchset tries to address that problem in 2 steps:
> > 
> > 0) Allowing user to dynamically configure mempool handle by
> > passing pool handle as eal arg to `--mbuf-pool-ops=<pool-handle>`.
> > 
> > 1) Allowing PMD's to advertise their preferred pool to an application.
> >  From an application point of view:
> > - The application must ask PMD about their preferred pool.
> > - PMD to respond back with preferred pool otherwise
> >    CONFIG_RTE_MEMPOOL_DEFAULT_OPS will be used for that PMD.
> > 
> > * Application programming sequencing would be
> >      char pref_mempool[RTE_MEMPOOL_OPS_NAMESIZE];
> >      rte_eth_dev_get_preferred_pool_ops(ethdev_port_id, pref_mempool /* out */);
> >      rte_mempool_create_empty();
> >      rte_mempool_set_ops_byname( , pref_memppol, );
> >      rte_mempool_populate_default();
> 
> What about introducing an API like:
> rte_pktmbuf_poll_create_with_ops (..., ops_name, config_pool);
> 
> I think that API would help for the case the application wants an mbuf pool
> with ie. stack handler.
> Sure we can do the empty/set_ops/populate sequence, but the only thing we
> want to change from default pktmbuf_pool_create API is the pool handler.
> 
> Application just needs to decide the ops handler to use, either default or
> one suggested by PMD?
> 
> I think ideally we would have similar APIs:
> - rte_mempool_create_with_ops (...)
> - rte_memppol_xmem_create_with_ops (...)

Today, we may only want to change the mempool handler, but if we
need to change something else tomorrow, we would need to add another
parameter again, breaking the ABI.

If we pass a config structure, adding a new field in it would also break the
ABI, except if the structure is opaque, with accessors. These accessors would be
functions (ex: mempool_cfg_new, mempool_cfg_set_pool_ops, ...). This is not so
much different than what we have now.

The advantage I can see of working on a config structure instead of directly on
a mempool is that the api can be reused to build a default config.

That said, I think it's quite orthogonal to this patch since we still require
the ethdev api.

Olivier

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-09-04 13:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-01  8:05 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Allow application set " Santosh Shukla
2017-06-01  8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal: Introducing option to " Santosh Shukla
2017-06-30 14:12   ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 12:33     ` santosh
2017-06-01  8:05 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] ether/ethdev: Allow pmd to advertise preferred pool capability Santosh Shukla
2017-06-30 14:13   ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 12:39     ` santosh
2017-07-04 13:07       ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 14:12         ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-19 11:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] Allow application set mempool handle Hemant Agrawal
2017-06-19 13:01   ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-20 10:37     ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-06-20 14:04       ` Jerin Jacob
2017-06-30 14:12         ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-04 12:25           ` santosh
2017-07-04 15:59             ` Olivier Matz
2017-07-05  7:48               ` santosh
2017-07-20  7:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] Dynamically configure " Santosh Shukla
2017-07-20  7:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-08-15  8:07     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-08-15  8:07       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-09-04 11:46         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-07  9:25         ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-08-15  8:07       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] ethdev: allow pmd to advertise " Santosh Shukla
2017-09-04 12:11         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-04 13:14           ` santosh
2017-09-07  9:21             ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-09-07 10:06               ` santosh
2017-09-07 10:11                 ` santosh
2017-09-07 11:08                   ` Hemant Agrawal
2017-09-11  9:33                     ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-11 12:40                       ` santosh
2017-09-11 13:00                         ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-04  9:41       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2017-09-04 13:20         ` santosh
2017-09-04 13:34         ` Olivier MATZ [this message]
2017-09-04 14:24           ` Sergio Gonzalez Monroy
2017-09-05  7:47             ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-05  8:11               ` Jerin Jacob
2017-09-11 15:18       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 " Santosh Shukla
2017-09-11 15:18         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-09-25  7:28           ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-25 21:23             ` santosh
2017-09-11 15:18         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pools for a port Santosh Shukla
2017-09-25  7:37           ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-25 21:52             ` santosh
2017-09-29  5:00               ` santosh
2017-09-29  8:32               ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-29 10:16                 ` santosh
2017-09-29 11:21                   ` santosh
2017-09-29 11:23                   ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-29 11:31                     ` santosh
2017-09-13 10:00         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle santosh
2017-09-19  8:28           ` santosh
2017-09-25  7:24             ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-25 21:58               ` santosh
2017-10-01  9:14         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " Santosh Shukla
2017-10-01  9:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-10-02 14:29             ` Olivier MATZ
2017-10-06  0:29             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-06  3:31               ` santosh
2017-10-06  8:39                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-06  7:45             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-10-06  7:45               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] eal: allow user to override default pool handle Santosh Shukla
2017-10-06  7:45               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pool for a port Santosh Shukla
2017-10-06 18:58               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-01  9:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] ethdev: get the supported pool for a port Santosh Shukla
2017-10-02 14:31             ` Olivier MATZ
2017-10-06  0:30             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-06  3:32               ` santosh
2017-10-02  8:37           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/2] Dynamically configure mempool handle santosh
2017-07-20  7:06   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] ethdev: allow pmd to advertise pool handle Santosh Shukla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20170904133437.ym3cd7n3dswt4yjb@neon \
    --to=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hemant.agrawal@nxp.com \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=santosh.shukla@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=sergio.gonzalez.monroy@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).