DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
Cc: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] lpm6: fix compilation with -Og
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:42:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171026104226.GA11456@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <228abb94-4939-8425-9451-2fb57fd1c567@intel.com>

On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:18:00AM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 9/11/2017 4:13 PM, Olivier Matz wrote:
> > The compilation with gcc-6.3.0 and EXTRA_CFLAGS=-Og gives the following
> > error:
> > 
> >   CC rte_lpm6.o
> >   rte_lpm6.c: In function ‘rte_lpm6_add_v1705’:
> >   rte_lpm6.c:442:11: error: ‘tbl_next’ may be used uninitialized in
> >                              this function [-Werror=maybe-uninitialized]
> >      if (!tbl[tbl_index].valid) {
> >              ^
> >   rte_lpm6.c:521:29: note: ‘tbl_next’ was declared here
> >     struct rte_lpm6_tbl_entry *tbl_next;
> >                                ^~~~~~~~
> > 
> > This is a false positive from gcc. Fix it by initializing tbl_next
> > to NULL.
> 
> This is hard to trace, and it seems there is a way to have it, not sure
> practically possible:
> 
> rte_lpm6_add_v1705
>     add_step
>         if (depth <= bits_covered) {
>             ...
>             return 0 <--- so tbl_next stays untouched.
>     tbl = tbl_next
>     add_step
>         tbl[tbl_index]
> 
> 
> So same comment as previous, if there is a practically available path,
> this patch makes it harder to find by hiding compiler warning, so adding
> maintainer for decision.
> 
> 
+Cristian, who has more knowledge of this library than I.

I don't think there is an issue here, since there is an additional check
before the second and subsequent calls to add_step(). The condition
check on the loop in add_v1705 is:

"i < RTE_LPM6_IPV6_ADDR_SIZE && status == 1;"

The "return 0" sets status to 0, causing the loop to break, preventing
any more calls to "tbl = tbl_next".

Therefore I don't think this masks an issue, and the fix is ok.

In the absense of any other objections or comments on this from
Cristian:

Acked-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

  reply	other threads:[~2017-10-26 10:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-11 15:13 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] " Olivier Matz
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/10] net/bnxt: " Olivier Matz
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/10] net/qede: " Olivier Matz
2017-09-11 18:22   ` Patil, Harish
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/10] net/virtio: " Olivier Matz
2017-10-05 23:17   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-05 23:28     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-06  6:43   ` Maxime Coquelin
2017-10-06 18:43     ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/10] net/i40e: " Olivier Matz
2017-10-05 23:24   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-11  6:20     ` Wu, Jingjing
2017-10-11  7:52       ` Olivier MATZ
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/10] uio: " Olivier Matz
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/10] cmdline: " Olivier Matz
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/10] metrics: " Olivier Matz
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/10] lpm6: " Olivier Matz
2017-10-06  0:18   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-26 10:42     ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2017-10-26 18:54   ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/10] app/test-crypto-perf: fix memory leak Olivier Matz
2017-10-05  9:29   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-09-11 15:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/10] app/test-crypto-perf: fix compilation with -Og Olivier Matz
2017-10-05  9:36   ` De Lara Guarch, Pablo
2017-09-11 15:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/10] " Bruce Richardson
2017-10-06  0:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-10-06  7:31   ` Olivier MATZ

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171026104226.GA11456@bricha3-MOBL3.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).