From: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Cc: thomas@monjalon.net, john.mcnamara@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2017 14:36:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171211193619.21643-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171201185628.16261-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Hey all-
A few days ago, I was lamenting the fact that, when reviewing patches I
would frequently complain about ABI changes that were actually considered safe
because they were part of the EXPERIMENTAL api set. John M. asked me then what
I might do to improve the situation, and the following patch set is a proposal
that I've come up with.
In thinking about the problem I identified two issues that I think we
can improve on in this area:
1) Make experimental api calls more visible in the source code. That is to say,
when reviewing patches, it would be nice to have some sort of visual reference
that indicates that the changes being made are part of an experimental API and
therefore ABI concerns need not be addressed
2) Make experimenal api usage more visible to consumers of the DPDK, so that
they can make a more informed decision about the API's they consume in their
application. We make an effort to document all the experimental API's, but
there is no guarantee that a user will check the documentation before making use
of a new library.
This patch set attempts to achieve both of the above goals. To do this I've
added an __experimental macro tag, suitable for inserting into api forward
declarations and definitions.
The presence of the tag in the header and c files where the api code resides
increases the likelyhood that any patch submitted against them will include the
tag in the context, making it clear to reviewers that ABI stability isn't a
concern here.
Also, This tag marks each function it is used on with an attibute causing any
use of the fuction to emit a warning during the build
with a message indicating that the API call in question is not yet part of the
stable interface. Developers can then make an informed decision to suppress
that warning or not.
Because there is internal use of several experimental API's, this set also
includes a new override macro ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_APIS to automatically
suprress these warnings. I think its fair to assume that, for internal use, we
almost always want to suppress these warnings, as by definition any change to
the apis (even their removal) must be done in parallel with an appropriate
change in the calling locations, lest the dpdk build itself break.
Neil
---
Change Notes:
v2)
* Cleaned up checkpatch errors
* Added Allowance for building experimental on BSD
* Swapped Patch 3 and 4 so that we didn't have a commit level that issued
warnings/errors without need
v3)
* On suggestion from Bruce, modify ALLOW_EXPERIMENTAL_APIS to be defined in
CFLAGS rather than a makefile variable. This is more flexible in that it
allows us to suppress this specific feature rather than all uses of the
deprecated attribute, as we might use it for other features in the furute
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-11 19:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 83+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-01 18:56 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Neil Horman
2017-12-01 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] buildtools: Add tool to check EXPERIMENTAL api exports Neil Horman
2017-12-01 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] compat: Add __experimental macro Neil Horman
2017-12-01 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] dpdk: add __experimental tag to appropriate api calls Neil Horman
2017-12-01 18:56 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] Makefiles: Add experimental tag check and warnings to trigger on use Neil Horman
2017-12-08 17:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging Neil Horman
2017-12-08 17:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2 1/4] buildtools: Add tool to check EXPERIMENTAL api exports Neil Horman
2017-12-08 17:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2 2/4] compat: Add __experimental macro Neil Horman
2017-12-08 17:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2 3/4] Makefiles: Add experimental tag check and warnings to trigger on use Neil Horman
2017-12-11 11:35 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-11 12:40 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-11 12:45 ` Bruce Richardson
2017-12-11 18:44 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-08 17:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv2 4/4] dpdk: add __experimental tag to appropriate api calls Neil Horman
2017-12-11 19:36 ` Neil Horman [this message]
2017-12-11 19:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 1/4] buildtools: Add tool to check EXPERIMENTAL api exports Neil Horman
2017-12-11 19:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 2/4] compat: Add __experimental macro Neil Horman
2017-12-11 19:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 3/4] Makefiles: Add experimental tag check and warnings to trigger on use Neil Horman
2017-12-11 19:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 4/4] dpdk: add __experimental tag to appropriate api calls Neil Horman
2017-12-12 14:07 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv3 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging Bruce Richardson
2017-12-30 17:15 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-04 12:56 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-05 14:08 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 16:00 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-09 1:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-ci] " Neil Horman
2018-01-09 9:20 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-09 12:36 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-19 15:44 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-12 14:33 ` [dpdk-dev] " Mcnamara, John
2017-12-12 20:18 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-12 15:11 ` Wiles, Keith
2017-12-12 20:14 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-13 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 " Neil Horman
2017-12-13 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 1/5] buildtools: Add tool to check EXPERIMENTAL api exports Neil Horman
2018-01-21 18:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-21 22:07 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-13 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 2/5] compat: Add __experimental macro Neil Horman
2018-01-21 18:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-13 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 3/5] Makefiles: Add experimental tag check and warnings to trigger on use Neil Horman
2018-01-11 20:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-11 20:50 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-12 11:49 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-12 12:44 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-21 18:54 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-22 1:34 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:37 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-21 18:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-22 1:19 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-13 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 4/5] dpdk: add __experimental tag to appropriate api calls Neil Horman
2018-01-11 20:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-11 21:24 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-12 11:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-12 14:25 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-12 15:53 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-12-13 15:17 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 5/5] doc: Add ABI __experimental tag documentation Neil Horman
2017-12-13 15:32 ` Bruce Richardson
2018-01-11 20:06 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-11 21:29 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-12 11:50 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-12 14:37 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-12 15:55 ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-01-13 0:28 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-13 15:56 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-14 14:36 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-14 16:27 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-21 20:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-12-13 15:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv4 0/4] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging Bruce Richardson
2017-12-21 14:21 ` Neil Horman
2017-12-30 19:20 ` Luca Boccassi
2017-12-31 1:57 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] " Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [[PATCH v5] 1/5] buildtools: Add tool to check EXPERIMENTAL api exports Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [[PATCH v5] 2/5] compat: Add __rte_experimental macro Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [[PATCH v5] 3/5] Makefiles: Add experimental tag check and warnings to trigger on use Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [[PATCH v5] 4/5] dpdk: add __rte_experimental tag to appropriate api calls Neil Horman
2018-01-22 1:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [[PATCH v5] 5/5] doc: Add ABI __experimental tag documentation Neil Horman
2018-01-23 10:35 ` Mcnamara, John
2018-01-29 21:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-29 21:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/5] dpdk: enhance EXPERIMENTAL api tagging Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-30 15:54 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-30 16:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-31 12:18 ` Neil Horman
2018-01-31 12:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171211193619.21643-1-nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--to=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=john.mcnamara@intel.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).