DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jianbo Liu <jianbo.liu@arm.com>
To: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
Cc: adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com,
	jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	Thomas Speier <tspeier@qti.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal/arm64: modify I/O device memory barriers
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 09:55:58 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180108015557.GA25103@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171227042824.33373-1-yskoh@mellanox.com>

The 12/26/2017 20:28, Yongseok Koh wrote:
> Instead of using system-wide 'dsb' instruction for IO barriers, 'dmb' is
> sufficient and could bring better performance. Using 'dmb' with Outer
> Shareable Domain option is also consistent with linux kernel.

But in kernel dsb is used for io barriers.
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/include/asm/io.h#L109

Do you consider adding dma_*mb?
https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/arch/arm64/include/asm/barrier.h#L40

>
> Cc: Thomas Speier <tspeier@qti.qualcomm.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Yongseok Koh <yskoh@mellanox.com>
> Acked-by: Thomas Speier <tspeier@qti.qualcomm.com>
> Acked-by: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>
> ---
>  lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_atomic_64.h | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_atomic_64.h b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_atomic_64.h
> index 0b70d6209..8dcce6054 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_atomic_64.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/arm/rte_atomic_64.h
> @@ -58,11 +58,11 @@ extern "C" {
>
>  #define rte_smp_rmb() dmb(ishld)
>
> -#define rte_io_mb() rte_mb()
> +#define rte_io_mb() dmb(osh)
>
> -#define rte_io_wmb() rte_wmb()
> +#define rte_io_wmb() dmb(oshst)
>
> -#define rte_io_rmb() rte_rmb()
> +#define rte_io_rmb() dmb(oshld)
>
>  #ifdef __cplusplus
>  }
> --
> 2.11.0
>

--
IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-08  1:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-27  4:28 Yongseok Koh
2017-12-27  4:28 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: fix synchonization on polling Rx completions Yongseok Koh
2018-01-04 12:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] eal/arm64: modify I/O device memory barriers Jerin Jacob
2018-01-08  1:55 ` Jianbo Liu [this message]
2018-01-16  0:42   ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] introduce DMA " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] eal: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  2:47     ` Jianbo Liu
2018-01-16  7:49     ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-01-16  9:10       ` Jianbo Liu
2018-01-17 13:46         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-17 18:39           ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-18 11:56             ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-01-18 18:14               ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] eal/x86: define " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] eal/ppc64: define DMA device " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] eal/armv7: define DMA " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  2:48     ` Jianbo Liu
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] eal/arm64: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  2:50     ` Jianbo Liu
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] net/mlx5: remove unnecessary memory barrier Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] net/mlx5: replace IO memory barrier with DMA " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  1:10   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] net/mlx5: fix synchonization on polling Rx completions Yongseok Koh
2018-01-16  3:53     ` Jianbo Liu
2018-01-19  0:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] introduce DMA memory barriers Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/8] eal: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  7:16       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2018-01-22 18:29         ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-22 20:59           ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-23  4:35           ` Jerin Jacob
2018-01-25 19:08             ` Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/8] eal/x86: define " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/8] eal/ppc64: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/8] eal/armv7: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] eal/arm64: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] net/mlx5: remove unnecessary memory barrier Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/8] net/mlx5: replace IO memory barrier with DMA " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-19  0:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] net/mlx5: fix synchonization on polling Rx completions Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/9] introduce coherent I/O memory barriers Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/9] eal: add Doxygen grouping for " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/9] eal: introduce coherent I/O " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/9] eal/x86: define " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/9] eal/ppc64: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/9] eal/armv7: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/9] eal/arm64: " Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/9] net/mlx5: remove unnecessary memory barrier Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/9] net/mlx5: replace I/O memory barrier with coherent version Yongseok Koh
2018-01-25 21:02       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 9/9] net/mlx5: fix synchronization on polling Rx completions Yongseok Koh
2018-01-28  7:32       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/9] introduce coherent I/O memory barriers Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180108015557.GA25103@arm.com \
    --to=jianbo.liu@arm.com \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
    --cc=nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com \
    --cc=tspeier@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).