DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rahul Lakkireddy <rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>, Kumar A S <kumaras@chelsio.com>,
	Surendra Mobiya <surendra@chelsio.com>,
	Nirranjan Kirubaharan <nirranjan@chelsio.com>,
	Indranil Choudhury <indranil@chelsio.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] cxgbe: add support to update RSS hash configuration and key
Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2018 12:31:46 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180207070144.GA7499@chelsio.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12269159.jrIR7R1Xa1@xps>

On Tuesday, February 02/06/18, 2018 at 16:08:35 +0530, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 06/02/2018 11:11, Ferruh Yigit:
> > On 2/6/2018 9:22 AM, Rahul Lakkireddy wrote:
> > > On Monday, February 02/05/18, 2018 at 22:39:55 +0530, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > >> I tend to get driver patches even after integration deadline, mainly because of
> > >> their limited scope.
> > >> But since these are new features, submitted just before rc3, adding with
> > >> questions in first patch, I am for postponing this patchset to next release and
> > >> do more review, what do you think?
> > > 
> > > Does dpdk-next-net tree work similar to linux "next" trees?  I mean does
> > > it represent the next release (DPDK 18.05-rc1) merge window?  Can we
> > > explicitly mention in Patch title which tree it is targeted for viz.
> > > dpdk or dpdk-next-net?
> > 
> > Hi Rahul,
> > 
> > It is not like Linux next trees, this is more like Dave's net tree.
> > In dpdk responsibilities split into sub-trees, and all target current release,
> > patches merged into sub-trees and pulled by main tree in integration deadline.
> > 
> > All network drivers and ethdev abstraction layer patches goes into next-net
> > sub-tree.
> > 
> > 
> > Briefly overall process is [1]:
> > - A new feature needs to be sent before proposal deadline, this can be a full
> > version of the set or RFC. Proposal deadline for the release announced in
> > https://dpdk.org/dev/roadmap
> > 
> > - After that point code reviews done and new versions sent till integration
> > deadline. Accepted patches are integrated to release candidate 1 (rc1).
> > Of course patch can be reviewed and merged without waiting integration deadline.
> > If a patch not get an approval and merge into tree in integration deadline,
> > most probably it won't go into release.
> > 
> > - Fixes can be sent from beginning of release to rcX. Only latest rcX mostly for
> > the fixes on features introduced in that release.
> > 
> > - After rc1, code tested and fixes sent for found defects. No new feature
> > expected after rc1.
> > 
> > - We go mostly to rc3 or rc4 before release.
> > 
> > 
> > [1]
> > Thomas, please correct me if I missed something. And this needs to be documented
> > indeed.
> 
> If the patchset targets 18.05, it should be notified.
> I suggest --subject-prefix='PATCH 18.05'.
> Then it will be marked as Deferred in patchwork until the start of
> the 18.05 release cycle.
> We can review it but we do not apply it before the start of the cycle,
> because we don't see a real need for such "in advance" branch.
> 

Thank you Ferruh and Thomas for explaining workings/role of
dpdk-next-net tree.

I will wait for few more days to get reviews on patch related to
multiprocess.  And then, will re-submit the series as v2 once
dpdk-18.02 gets released.

Thanks,
Rahul

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-07  7:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-04  6:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] cxgbe: bug fixes and updates Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] cxgbe: fix secondary process initialization Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-05 17:23   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-06  9:20     ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] cxgbe: update link state when link speed changes Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-05 17:05   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] cxgbe: add support to update RSS hash configuration and key Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-05 17:09   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-06  9:22     ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-06 10:11       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-02-06 10:38         ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-02-07  7:01           ` Rahul Lakkireddy [this message]
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] cxgbe: add support to get programmed " Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] cxgbe: update link Forward Error Correction (FEC) Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] cxgbe: update link configuration for 32-bit port capability Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-04  6:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] cxgbe: rework and use " Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] cxgbe: bug fixes and updates Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/7] cxgbe: rework rte_eth_dev allocation Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/7] cxgbe: fix secondary process initialization Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7] cxgbe: add support to update RSS hash configuration and key Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-03-08 13:34     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-10  5:21       ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/7] cxgbe: add support to get programmed " Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/7] cxgbe: update link Forward Error Correction (FEC) Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/7] cxgbe: update link configuration for 32-bit port capability Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-02-28 18:04   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/7] cxgbe: rework and use " Rahul Lakkireddy
2018-03-08 13:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/7] cxgbe: bug fixes and updates Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-08 13:50     ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-03-10  5:24       ` Rahul Lakkireddy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180207070144.GA7499@chelsio.com \
    --to=rahul.lakkireddy@chelsio.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=indranil@chelsio.com \
    --cc=kumaras@chelsio.com \
    --cc=nirranjan@chelsio.com \
    --cc=surendra@chelsio.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).