DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
Cc: jianfeng.tan@intel.com, stefanha@redhat.com, tiwei.bie@intel.com,
	dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/3] vhost: add SET_VIRTIO_STATUS support
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 14:10:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180227131005.a7cqbagkl65qtajn@dhcp-192-241.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180222181910.23134-3-maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 22, 2018 at 07:19:09PM +0100, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>This patch implements support for the new SET_VIRTIO_STATUS
>vhost-user request.
>
>The main use for this new request is for the backend to know
>when the driver sets the DRIVER_OK status bit. Starting Virtio
>1.0, we know that once the the bit is set, no more queues will
>be initialized.
>When it happens, this patch removes all queues starting from
>the first uninitialized one, so that the port starts even if
>the guest driver does not use all the queues provided by QEMU.
>This is for example the case with Windows driver, which only
>initializes as much queue pairs as vCPUs.
>
>The second use for this request is when the status changes to
>reset or failed state, the vhost port is stopped and virtqueues
>cleaned and freed.
>
>Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>---
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 98 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.h |  5 ++-
> 2 files changed, 102 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
>diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
>index c256ebb06..7ab02c44b 100644
>--- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
>+++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
>@@ -67,6 +67,7 @@ static const char *vhost_message_str[VHOST_USER_MAX] = {
> 	[VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU]  = "VHOST_USER_NET_SET_MTU",
> 	[VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD]  = "VHOST_USER_SET_SLAVE_REQ_FD",
> 	[VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG]  = "VHOST_USER_IOTLB_MSG",
>+	[VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS]  = "VHOST_USER_SET_VIRTIO_STATUS",
> };
>
> static uint64_t
>@@ -1244,6 +1245,100 @@ vhost_user_iotlb_msg(struct virtio_net **pdev, struct VhostUserMsg *msg)
> 	return 0;
> }
>
>+static int
>+vhost_user_set_virtio_status(struct virtio_net *dev, struct VhostUserMsg *msg)
>+{
>+	uint8_t old_status, new_status;
>+	uint32_t i;
>+
>+	/* As per Virtio spec, the Virtio device status is 8 bits wide */
>+	if (msg->payload.u64 != (uint8_t)msg->payload.u64) {
>+		RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>+				"Invalid Virtio dev status value (%lx)\n",
>+				msg->payload.u64);
>+		return -1;
>+	}
>+
>+	new_status = msg->payload.u64;
>+	old_status = dev->virtio_status;
>+
>+	if (new_status == old_status)
>+		return 0;
>+
>+	RTE_LOG(DEBUG, VHOST_CONFIG,
>+			"New Virtio device status %x (was %x)\n",
>+			new_status, old_status);
>+
>+	dev->virtio_status = new_status;
>+
>+	if (new_status == 0 || new_status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_FAILED) {
>+		/*
>+		 * The device moved to reset  or failed state,
>+		 * stop processing the virtqueues
>+		 */
>+		if (dev->flags & VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING) {
>+			dev->flags &= ~VIRTIO_DEV_RUNNING;
>+			dev->notify_ops->destroy_device(dev->vid);
>+		}
>+
>+		while (dev->nr_vring > 0) {
>+			struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>+
>+			vq = dev->virtqueue[--dev->nr_vring];
>+			if (!vq)
>+				continue;
>+
>+			dev->virtqueue[dev->nr_vring] = NULL;
>+			cleanup_vq(dev, vq, 1);
>+			free_vq(vq);
>+		}
>+
>+		return 0;
>+	}
>+
>+	if ((dev->features & (1ULL << VIRTIO_F_VERSION_1)) &&
>+			(new_status & VIRTIO_CONFIG_S_DRIVER_OK) &&
>+			!virtio_is_ready(dev)) {
>+		/*
>+		 * Since Virtio 1.0, we know that no more queues will be
>+		 * setup after guest sets DRIVER_OK. So let's remove
>+		 * uinitialized queues.
>+		 */
>+		RTE_LOG(INFO, VHOST_CONFIG,
>+				"Driver is ready, but some queues aren't initialized\n");
>+
>+		/*
>+		 * Find the first uninitialized queue.
>+		 *
>+		 * Note: Ideally the backend implementation should
>+		 * support sparsed virtqueues, but as long as it is
>+		 * not the case, let's remove all queues after the
>+		 * first uninitialized one.
>+		 */
>+		for (i = 0; i < dev->nr_vring; i++) {
>+			if (!vq_is_ready(dev->virtqueue[i]))
>+				break;
>+		}
>+
>+		while (dev->nr_vring >= i) {
>+			struct vhost_virtqueue *vq;
>+
>+			vq = dev->virtqueue[--dev->nr_vring];

If i is 0, we could access an array element out of bounds, no?

With this fixed,

Reviewed-by: Jens Freimann <jfreimann@redhat.com> 

regards,
Jens 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-02-27 13:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-02-22 18:19 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 0/3] vhost: multiqueue improvements Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-22 18:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 1/3] vhost: invalidate vring addresses in cleanup_vq() Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-27 11:22   ` Jens Freimann
2018-02-27 11:44     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-27 11:54       ` Jens Freimann
2018-02-22 18:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 2/3] vhost: add SET_VIRTIO_STATUS support Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-27 13:10   ` Jens Freimann [this message]
2018-02-27 14:04     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-02-22 18:19 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 3/3] vhost_user: work around invalid rings addresses sent by QEMU Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180227131005.a7cqbagkl65qtajn@dhcp-192-241.str.redhat.com \
    --to=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jianfeng.tan@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).