From: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
To: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, bruce.richardson@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ring: relax alignment constraint on ring structure
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 20:37:23 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180403150722.GB15937@jerin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180403132644.23729-1-olivier.matz@6wind.com>
-----Original Message-----
> Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 15:26:44 +0200
> From: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ring: relax alignment constraint on ring
> structure
> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0
>
> The initial objective of
> commit d9f0d3a1ffd4 ("ring: remove split cacheline build setting")
> was to add an empty cache line betwee, the producer and consumer
> data (on platform with cache line size = 64B), preventing from
> having them on adjacent cache lines.
>
> Following discussion on the mailing list, it appears that this
> also imposes an alignment constraint that is not required.
>
> This patch removes the extra alignment constraint and adds the
> empty cache lines using padding fields in the structure. The
> size of rte_ring structure and the offset of the fields remain
> the same on platforms with cache line size = 64B:
>
> rte_ring = 384
> rte_ring.name = 0
> rte_ring.flags = 32
> rte_ring.memzone = 40
> rte_ring.size = 48
> rte_ring.mask = 52
> rte_ring.prod = 128
> rte_ring.cons = 256
>
> But it has an impact on platform where cache line size is 128B:
>
> rte_ring = 384 -> 768
> rte_ring.name = 0
> rte_ring.flags = 32
> rte_ring.memzone = 40
> rte_ring.size = 48
> rte_ring.mask = 52
> rte_ring.prod = 128 -> 256
Are we leaving TWO cacheline to make sure, HW prefetch don't load
the adjust cacheline(consumer)?
If so, Will it have impact on those machine where it is 128B Cache line
and the HW prefetcher is not loading the next caching explicitly. Right?
> rte_ring.cons = 256 -> 512
>
> Link: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/25039/
> Suggested-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-04-03 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-06-30 14:26 [dpdk-dev] [RFC] " Olivier Matz
2017-07-20 8:52 ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 13:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 15:07 ` Jerin Jacob [this message]
2018-04-03 15:25 ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 15:37 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-03 15:56 ` Olivier Matz
2018-04-03 16:42 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-04 23:38 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-05 8:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-05 13:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-06 1:26 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-11 0:33 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-11 2:48 ` Jerin Jacob
2018-04-11 8:40 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2018-04-17 22:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-05-25 10:59 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-25 12:18 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-25 14:57 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-05-25 15:17 ` Olivier Matz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180403150722.GB15937@jerin \
--to=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).