DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, brian.russell@intl.att.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] virtio: fix PCI config err handling
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 13:29:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180827052934.GA34061@fbsd.sh.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824171420.31246-2-bluca@debian.org>

On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:14:20PM +0100, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> From: Brian Russell <brussell@brocade.com>
> 
> In virtio_read_caps and vtpci_msix_detect, rte_pci_read_config returns
> the number of bytes read from PCI config or < 0 on error.
> If less than the expected number of bytes are read then log the
> failure and return rather than carrying on with garbage.
> 
> Fixes: 6ba1f63b5ab0 ("virtio: support specification 1.0")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Brian Russell <brussell@brocade.com>
> Signed-off-by: Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
> ---
> v2: handle additional rte_pci_read_config incomplete reads
> v3: do not handle rte_pci_read_config of virtio cap, added in v2,
>     as it's less clear what the right thing to do there is
> v4: do a more robust check - first check what the vendor is, and
>     skip the cap entirely if it's not what we are looking for.
> 
>  drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> index 6bd22e54a6..cfefa9789b 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c
> @@ -567,16 +567,30 @@ virtio_read_caps(struct rte_pci_device *dev, struct virtio_hw *hw)
>  	}
>  
>  	ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &pos, 1, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "failed to read pci capability list");
> +	if (ret != 1) {
> +		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +			     "failed to read pci capability list, ret %d", ret);
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
>  	while (pos) {
> +		ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &cap, 2, pos);
> +		if (ret != 2) {
> +			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +				     "failed to read pci cap at pos: %x ret %d",
> +				     pos, ret);
> +			break;
> +		}
> +		if (cap.cap_vndr != PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX &&
> +				cap.cap_vndr != PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR) {
> +			goto next;
> +		}
> +
>  		ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &cap, sizeof(cap), pos);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> -				"failed to read pci cap at pos: %x", pos);
> +		if (ret != sizeof(cap)) {
> +			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +				     "failed to read pci cap at pos: %x ret %d",
> +				     pos, ret);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  

It seems that I didn't make myself clear in my previous
comments. I mean it's better to handle MSIX cap and virtio
cap respectively in this function. Currently we're always
reading them as virtio caps. As we are strictly requiring
that _read_config() should return the required number of
bytes, it's not perfect to require it to return "virtio
cap size" of bytes while we're trying to read a MSIX cap.
So please change the code to something similar to this:

	while (pos) {
		ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &cap, 2, pos);
		if (ret != 2) {
			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
				     "failed to read pci cap at pos: %x ret %d",
				     pos, ret);
			break;
		}

		if (cap.cap_vndr == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX) {
			/* Transitional devices would also have this capability,
			 * that's why we also check if msix is enabled.
			 * 1st byte is cap ID; 2nd byte is the position of next
			 * cap; next two bytes are the flags.
			 */
			uint16_t flags;

			ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &flags, sizeof(flags),
					pos + 2);
			if (ret != sizeof(flags)) {
				PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
					"failed to read pci cap at pos: %x ret %d",
					pos + 2, ret);
				break;
			}

			if (flags & PCI_MSIX_ENABLE)
				hw->use_msix = VIRTIO_MSIX_ENABLED;
			else
				hw->use_msix = VIRTIO_MSIX_DISABLED;
		}

		if (cap.cap_vndr != PCI_CAP_ID_VNDR) {
			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
				"[%2x] skipping non VNDR cap id: %02x",
				pos, cap.cap_vndr);
			goto next;
		}

		ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &cap, sizeof(cap), pos);
		if (ret != sizeof(cap)) {
			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
				     "failed to read pci cap at pos: %x ret %d",
				     pos, ret);
			break;
		}

		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
			"[%2x] cfg type: %u, bar: %u, offset: %04x, len: %u",
			pos, cap.cfg_type, cap.bar, cap.offset, cap.length);

		switch (cap.cfg_type) {
		......



> @@ -689,25 +703,38 @@ enum virtio_msix_status
>  vtpci_msix_detect(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
>  {
>  	uint8_t pos;
> -	struct virtio_pci_cap cap;
>  	int ret;
>  
>  	ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &pos, 1, PCI_CAPABILITY_LIST);
> -	if (ret < 0) {
> -		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG, "failed to read pci capability list");
> +	if (ret != 1) {
> +		PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +			     "failed to read pci capability list, ret %d", ret);
>  		return VIRTIO_MSIX_NONE;
>  	}
>  
>  	while (pos) {
> -		ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &cap, sizeof(cap), pos);
> -		if (ret < 0) {
> -			PMD_INIT_LOG(ERR,
> -				"failed to read pci cap at pos: %x", pos);
> +		uint8_t cap[2];
> +
> +		ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, cap, sizeof(cap), pos);
> +		if (ret != sizeof(cap)) {
> +			PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +				     "failed to read pci cap at pos: %x ret %d",
> +				     pos, ret);
>  			break;
>  		}
>  
> -		if (cap.cap_vndr == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX) {
> -			uint16_t flags = ((uint16_t *)&cap)[1];
> +		if (cap[0] == PCI_CAP_ID_MSIX) {
> +			uint16_t flags;
> +
> +			ret = rte_pci_read_config(dev, &flags, sizeof(flags),
> +					pos + sizeof(cap));
> +			if (ret != sizeof(flags)) {
> +				PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
> +					     "failed to read pci cap at pos:"
> +					     " %x ret %d", pos + sizeof(cap),

There is a build error:

In file included from drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c:15:
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c: In function ‘vtpci_msix_detect’:
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_logs.h:13:3: error: format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’, but argument 5 has type ‘long unsigned int’ [-Werror=format=]
   "%s(): " fmt "\n", __func__, ##args)
   ^~~~~~~~
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c:732:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘PMD_INIT_LOG’
     PMD_INIT_LOG(DEBUG,
     ^~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/net/virtio/virtio_pci.c:734:14: note: format string is defined here
           " %x ret %d", pos + sizeof(cap),
             ~^
             %lx


> +					     ret);
> +				break;
> +			}
>  
>  			if (flags & PCI_MSIX_ENABLE)
>  				return VIRTIO_MSIX_ENABLED;
> @@ -715,7 +742,7 @@ vtpci_msix_detect(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
>  				return VIRTIO_MSIX_DISABLED;
>  		}
>  
> -		pos = cap.cap_next;
> +		pos = cap[1];
>  	}
>  
>  	return VIRTIO_MSIX_NONE;
> -- 
> 2.18.0
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-08-27  5:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-08-14 14:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-08-14 14:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] virtio: fix PCI config err handling Luca Boccassi
2018-08-15  3:11   ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-15  9:50     ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-16  6:46       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-16 10:27         ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-16 18:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-08-16 18:47   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] virtio: fix PCI config err handling Luca Boccassi
2018-08-16 18:49     ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-20  8:18       ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-20 16:45         ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-21  2:40           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-23 12:52             ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-24  4:23               ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-24 17:14                 ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-20 16:44   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-08-20 16:44     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] virtio: fix PCI config err handling Luca Boccassi
2018-08-24 17:14     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-08-24 17:14       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/2] virtio: fix PCI config err handling Luca Boccassi
2018-08-27  5:29         ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2018-08-27 16:52           ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-28  6:47             ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-27 16:52       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-08-27 16:52         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/2] virtio: fix PCI config err handling Luca Boccassi
2018-08-28  6:43           ` Tiwei Bie
2018-08-28 10:14             ` Luca Boccassi
2018-08-28 10:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-08-28 10:12           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/2] net/virtio: fix PCI config err handling Luca Boccassi
2018-10-11 10:27             ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-11 10:53               ` Luca Boccassi
2018-10-11 13:01                 ` Tiwei Bie
2018-10-28 23:55                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-10-17  9:58           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/2] bus/pci: harmonize and document rte_pci_read_config return value Luca Boccassi
2018-10-17 10:57             ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180827052934.GA34061@fbsd.sh.intel.com \
    --to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=brian.russell@intl.att.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).