patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
To: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com, dev@dpdk.org,
	seanbh@gmail.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio-user: fix memory hotplug support in vhost-kernel
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2018 19:37:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180907113744.GA22511@debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a82e230d-7fd7-ade0-d7a9-18265f30b00b@intel.com>

On Fri, Sep 07, 2018 at 10:44:22AM +0100, Burakov, Anatoly wrote:
> On 05-Sep-18 5:28 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
> > It's possible to have much more hugepage backed memory regions
> > than what vhost-kernel supports due to the memory hotplug, which
> > may cause problems. A better solution is to have the virtio-user
> > pass all the memory ranges reserved by DPDK to vhost-kernel.
> > 
> > Fixes: 12ecb2f63b12 ("net/virtio-user: support memory hotplug")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
> > ---
> >   drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c | 38 +++++++++----------
> >   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
> > index 897fee0af..9338166d9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/vhost_kernel.c
> > @@ -70,41 +70,41 @@ static uint64_t vhost_req_user_to_kernel[] = {
> >   	[VHOST_USER_SET_MEM_TABLE] = VHOST_SET_MEM_TABLE,
> >   };
> > -struct walk_arg {
> > -	struct vhost_memory_kernel *vm;
> > -	uint32_t region_nr;
> > -};
> >   static int
> > -add_memory_region(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl __rte_unused,
> > -		const struct rte_memseg *ms, size_t len, void *arg)
> > +add_memseg_list(const struct rte_memseg_list *msl, void *arg)
> >   {
> > -	struct walk_arg *wa = arg;
> > +	struct vhost_memory_kernel *vm = arg;
> >   	struct vhost_memory_region *mr;
> >   	void *start_addr;
> > +	uint64_t len;
> > -	if (wa->region_nr >= max_regions)
> > +	if (vm->nregions >= max_regions)
> >   		return -1;
> > -	mr = &wa->vm->regions[wa->region_nr++];
> > -	start_addr = ms->addr;
> > +	start_addr = msl->base_va;
> > +	len = msl->page_sz * msl->memseg_arr.len;
> > +
> > +	mr = &vm->regions[vm->nregions++];
> >   	mr->guest_phys_addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)start_addr;
> >   	mr->userspace_addr = (uint64_t)(uintptr_t)start_addr;
> >   	mr->memory_size = len;
> > -	mr->mmap_offset = 0;
> > +	mr->mmap_offset = 0; /* flags_padding */
> > +
> > +	PMD_DRV_LOG(DEBUG, "index=%u addr=%p len=%" PRIu64,
> > +			vm->nregions - 1, start_addr, len);
> >   	return 0;
> >   }
> > -/* By default, vhost kernel module allows 64 regions, but DPDK allows
> > - * 256 segments. As a relief, below function merges those virtually
> > - * adjacent memsegs into one region.
> > +/* By default, vhost kernel module allows 64 regions, but DPDK may
> > + * have much more memory regions. Below function will treat each
> > + * contiguous memory space reserved by DPDK as one region.
> >    */
> >   static struct vhost_memory_kernel *
> >   prepare_vhost_memory_kernel(void)
> >   {
> >   	struct vhost_memory_kernel *vm;
> > -	struct walk_arg wa;
> >   	vm = malloc(sizeof(struct vhost_memory_kernel) +
> >   			max_regions *
> > @@ -112,20 +112,18 @@ prepare_vhost_memory_kernel(void)
> >   	if (!vm)
> >   		return NULL;
> > -	wa.region_nr = 0;
> > -	wa.vm = vm;
> > +	vm->nregions = 0;
> > +	vm->padding = 0;
> >   	/*
> >   	 * The memory lock has already been taken by memory subsystem
> >   	 * or virtio_user_start_device().
> >   	 */
> > -	if (rte_memseg_contig_walk_thread_unsafe(add_memory_region, &wa) < 0) {
> > +	if (rte_memseg_list_walk_thread_unsafe(add_memseg_list, vm) < 0) {
> >   		free(vm);
> >   		return NULL;
> >   	}
> > -	vm->nregions = wa.region_nr;
> > -	vm->padding = 0;
> >   	return vm;
> >   }
> > 
> 
> Doesn't that assume single file segments mode?

This is to find out the VA ranges reserved by memory subsystem.
Why does it need to assume single file segments mode?


> 
> -- 
> Thanks,
> Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-07 11:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20180905042852.6212-1-tiwei.bie@intel.com>
2018-09-05  4:28 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 1/3] net/virtio-user: fix deadlock in memory events callback Tiwei Bie
2018-09-05  8:10   ` Sean Harte
2018-09-07  9:30   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 12:52   ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-09-05  4:28 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH 3/3] net/virtio-user: fix memory hotplug support in vhost-kernel Tiwei Bie
2018-09-07  9:44   ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-07 11:37     ` Tiwei Bie [this message]
2018-09-07 12:24       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-10  4:04         ` Tiwei Bie
2018-09-17 10:18           ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-09-11 13:10   ` Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180907113744.GA22511@debian \
    --to=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=seanbh@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).