patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@samsung.com>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, tiwei.bie@intel.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
	jfreimann@redhat.com, nicknickolaev@gmail.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, alejandro.lucero@netronome.com
Cc: dgilbert@redhat.com, stable@dpdk.org,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 01/17] vhost: fix messages error checks
Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2018 10:57:48 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181003075530eucas1p1dd7191a728c1129fd5d9dbaed5fa1047~aChpN_6wn1404114041eucas1p1H@eucas1p1.samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a57953d-67c6-26f3-f65f-4e5a1dcf1474@redhat.com>

On 03.10.2018 10:50, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/02/2018 04:15 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 02.10.2018 12:36, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>> Return of message handling has now changed to an enum that can
>>> take non-negative value that is not zero in case a reply is
>>> needed. But the code checking the variable afterwards has not
>>> been updated, leading to success messages handling being
>>> treated as errors.
>>>
>>> Fixes: 4e601952cae6 ("vhost: message handling implemented as a callback array")
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>>   lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c | 6 +++---
>>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
>>> index 7ef3fb4a4..060b41893 100644
>>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
>>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/vhost_user.c
>>> @@ -1783,7 +1783,7 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
>>>       }
>>>     skip_to_post_handle:
>>> -    if (!ret && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
>>> +    if (ret != VH_RESULT_ERR && dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle) {
>>>           uint32_t need_reply;
>>>             ret = (*dev->extern_ops.post_msg_handle)(
>>> @@ -1800,10 +1800,10 @@ vhost_user_msg_handler(int vid, int fd)
>>>           vhost_user_unlock_all_queue_pairs(dev);
>>>         if (msg.flags & VHOST_USER_NEED_REPLY) {
>>
>> Maybe we need to reply here only if we didn't reply
>> already (not VH_RESULT_REPLY) ? Otherwise, we could
>> reply twice (with payload and with return code).
> 
> Well, if the master sets this bit, it means it is waiting for
> a "reply-ack", so not sending it would cause the master to wait
> forever.
> 
> It is the master responsibility to not set this bit for requests
> already expecting a non "reply-ack" reply (as you fixed it for
> postcopy's set mem table case).

vhost-user docs in QEMU says:
"
For the message types that already solicit a reply from the client, the
presence of VHOST_USER_PROTOCOL_F_REPLY_ACK or need_reply bit being set brings
no behavioural change.
"
i.e. even if QEMU sets the need_reply flag, vhost should not reply twice.
Am I missing something?

> 
>>> -        msg.payload.u64 = !!ret;
>>> +        msg.payload.u64 = ret == VH_RESULT_ERR;
>>>           msg.size = sizeof(msg.payload.u64);
>>>           send_vhost_reply(fd, &msg);
>>> -    } else if (ret) {
>>> +    } else if (ret == VH_RESULT_ERR) {
>>>           RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_CONFIG,
>>>               "vhost message handling failed.\n");
>>>           return -1;
>>>
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-10-03  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-10-02  9:36 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 00/17] vhost: add postcopy live-migration support Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 01/17] vhost: fix messages error checks Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02 14:15   ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-03  7:50     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-03  7:57       ` Ilya Maximets [this message]
2018-10-03  8:02         ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-03  8:32           ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-03  9:07             ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-03 14:39               ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-04  5:42                 ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 02/17] vhost: fix return code of messages requiring replies Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-03 13:26   ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-03 14:49     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-04  5:49       ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 03/17] vhost: fix error handling when mem table gets updated Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 04/17] vhost: define postcopy protocol flag Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 05/17] vhost: add number of fds to vhost-user messages and use it Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 06/17] vhost: pass socket fd to message handling callbacks Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 07/17] vhost: enable fds passing when sending vhost-user messages Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 08/17] vhost: add config flag for postcopy feature Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 09/17] vhost: introduce postcopy's advise message Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 10/17] vhost: add support for postcopy's listen message Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02 14:11   ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-03  7:46     ` Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 11/17] vhost: register new regions with userfaultfd Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 12/17] vhost: avoid useless VhostUserMemory copy Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 13/17] vhost: send userfault range addresses back to qemu Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 14/17] vhost: add support to postcopy's end request Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02 14:18   ` Ilya Maximets
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 15/17] vhost: enable postcopy protocol feature Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 16/17] vhost: add flag to enable postcopy live-migration Maxime Coquelin
2018-10-02  9:36 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2 17/17] net/vhost: add parameter to enable postcopy support Maxime Coquelin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='20181003075530eucas1p1dd7191a728c1129fd5d9dbaed5fa1047~aChpN_6wn1404114041eucas1p1H@eucas1p1.samsung.com' \
    --to=i.maximets@samsung.com \
    --cc=alejandro.lucero@netronome.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
    --cc=jfreimann@redhat.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=nicknickolaev@gmail.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    --cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).