DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, shahafs@mellanox.com, yskoh@mellanox.com,
	thomas@monjalon.net, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/4] Allow using external memory without malloc
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 08:16:46 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181220081646.55593779@xeon-e3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1545319839.git.anatoly.burakov@intel.com>

On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 15:32:37 +0000
Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com> wrote:

> Currently, the only way to use externally allocated memory
> is through rte_malloc API's. While this is fine for a lot
> of use cases, it may not be suitable for certain other use
> cases like manual memory management, etc.
> 
> This patchset adds another API to register memory segments
> with DPDK (so that API's like ``rte_mem_virt2memseg`` could
> be relied on by PMD's and such), but not create a malloc
> heap out of them.
> 
> Aside from the obvious (not adding memory to a heap), the
> other major difference between this API and the
> ``rte_malloc_heap_*`` external memory functions is the fact
> that no DMA mapping is performed automatically, as well as
> no mem event callbacks are triggered.
> 
> This really draws a line in the sand, and there are now two
> ways of doing things - do everything automatically (using
> the ``rte_malloc_heap_*`` API's), or do everything manually
> (``rte_extmem_*`` and future DMA mapping API [1] that would
> replace ``rte_vfio_dma_map``). This way, the consistency of
> API is kept, and flexibility is also allowed.
> 
> [1] https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2018-November/118175.html

Where are the examples for this? Give a sample application maybe.

Also there are no test cases.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-12-20 16:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-29 13:48 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH " Anatoly Burakov
2018-11-29 13:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/4] malloc: separate creating memseg list and malloc heap Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14  9:33   ` Yongseok Koh
2018-11-29 13:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/4] malloc: separate destroying memseg list and heap data Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14  9:34   ` Yongseok Koh
2018-11-29 13:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/4] mem: allow registering external memory areas Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14  9:55   ` Yongseok Koh
2018-12-14 11:03     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-11-29 13:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/4] mem: allow usage of non-heap external memory in multiprocess Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14  9:56   ` Yongseok Koh
2018-12-02  5:48 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/4] Allow using external memory without malloc Shahaf Shuler
2018-12-02 23:28   ` Yongseok Koh
2018-12-03 10:23     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-12 12:55       ` Yongseok Koh
2018-12-12 13:17         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-14 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-20 15:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-20 16:16     ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2018-12-20 17:18       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-21  9:17         ` Burakov, Anatoly
2018-12-20 17:17     ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-12-20 15:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/4] malloc: separate creating memseg list and malloc heap Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-20 15:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/4] malloc: separate destroying memseg list and heap data Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-20 15:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/4] mem: allow registering external memory areas Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-20 15:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/4] mem: allow usage of non-heap external memory in multiprocess Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/4] malloc: separate creating memseg list and malloc heap Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/4] malloc: separate destroying memseg list and heap data Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/4] mem: allow registering external memory areas Anatoly Burakov
2018-12-14 11:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/4] mem: allow usage of non-heap external memory in multiprocess Anatoly Burakov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181220081646.55593779@xeon-e3 \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=shreyansh.jain@nxp.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=yskoh@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).