DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>
To: Gage Eads <gage.eads@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
	"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
	"bruce.richardson@intel.com" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"konstantin.ananyev@intel.com" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>, "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	nd <nd@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2019 23:27:00 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <VE1PR08MB514913AF291D82A8E5B90D2798590@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190328232700.THm4e5wbOnRud6fFSeitYf3c_14FE0r03d6an8jyUwM@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190306144559.391-6-gage.eads@intel.com>

<snip>

> diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c index
> 96dffdf44..8f0361ea1 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.c

<snip>

> @@ -63,9 +81,16 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int
> count, int socket_id,
>  	unsigned int sz;
>  	int ret;
> 
> -	RTE_SET_USED(flags);
> +#ifdef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> +	RTE_BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct rte_stack_lf_head) != 16);
This check should be independent of the platform.

 #else
> +	if (flags & RTE_STACK_F_LF) {
> +		STACK_LOG_ERR("Lock-free stack is not supported on your
> platform\n");
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +#endif
> 
> -	sz = rte_stack_get_memsize(count);
> +	sz = rte_stack_get_memsize(count, flags);
> 
>  	ret = snprintf(mz_name, sizeof(mz_name), "%s%s",
>  		       RTE_STACK_MZ_PREFIX, name);
> @@ -94,7 +119,7 @@ rte_stack_create(const char *name, unsigned int
> count, int socket_id,
> 
>  	s = mz->addr;
> 
> -	rte_stack_init(s);
> +	rte_stack_init(s, count, flags);
> 
>  	/* Store the name for later lookups */
>  	ret = snprintf(s->name, sizeof(s->name), "%s", name); diff --git
> a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h index
> 7a633deb5..b484313bb 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack.h
> @@ -30,6 +30,35 @@ extern "C" {

<snip>

> +/**
> + * @internal Push several objects on the lock-free stack (MT-safe).
> + *
> + * @param s
> + *   A pointer to the stack structure.
> + * @param obj_table
> + *   A pointer to a table of void * pointers (objects).
> + * @param n
> + *   The number of objects to push on the stack from the obj_table.
> + * @return
> + *   Actual number of objects enqueued.
> + */
> +static __rte_always_inline unsigned int __rte_experimental
This is an internal function. Is '__rte_experimental' tag required? (applies to other instances in this patch)

> +rte_stack_lf_push(struct rte_stack *s, void * const *obj_table,
> +unsigned int n) {
> +	struct rte_stack_lf_elem *tmp, *first, *last = NULL;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (unlikely(n == 0))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Pop n free elements */
> +	first = __rte_stack_lf_pop(&s->stack_lf.free, n, NULL, &last);
> +	if (unlikely(first == NULL))
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Construct the list elements */
> +	for (tmp = first, i = 0; i < n; i++, tmp = tmp->next)
> +		tmp->data = obj_table[n - i - 1];
> +
> +	/* Push them to the used list */
> +	__rte_stack_lf_push(&s->stack_lf.used, first, last, n);
> +
> +	return n;
> +}
> +
 
<snip>

> 
>  /**
> @@ -225,7 +339,10 @@ rte_stack_free_count(struct rte_stack *s)
>   *   NUMA. The value can be *SOCKET_ID_ANY* if there is no NUMA
>   *   constraint for the reserved zone.
>   * @param flags
> - *   Reserved for future use.
> + *   An OR of the following:
> + *    - RTE_STACK_F_LF: If this flag is set, the stack uses lock-free
> + *      variants of the push and pop functions. Otherwise, it achieves
> + *      thread-safety using a lock.
>   * @return
>   *   On success, the pointer to the new allocated stack. NULL on error with
>   *    rte_errno set appropriately. Possible errno values include:
> diff --git a/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_generic.h
> b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_generic.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000..5e4cbc38e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/librte_stack/rte_stack_generic.h
The name "...stack_generic.h" is confusing. It is implementing LF algorithm.
IMO, the code should be re-organized differently.
rte_stack.h, rte_stack.c - Contain the APIs (calling std or LF based on the flag) and top level structure definition
rte_stack_std.c, rte_stack_std.h - Contain the standard implementation
rte_stack_lf.c, rte_stack_lf.h - Contain the LF implementation
rte_stack_lf_c11.h - Contain the LF C11 implementation

> @@ -0,0 +1,151 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
> + * Copyright(c) 2019 Intel Corporation
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef _RTE_STACK_GENERIC_H_
> +#define _RTE_STACK_GENERIC_H_
> +
> +#include <rte_branch_prediction.h>
> +#include <rte_prefetch.h>
> +

<snip>

> +
> +static __rte_always_inline struct rte_stack_lf_elem *
> +__rte_stack_lf_pop(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list,
> +		   unsigned int num,
> +		   void **obj_table,
> +		   struct rte_stack_lf_elem **last)
> +{
> +#ifndef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> +	RTE_SET_USED(obj_table);
> +	RTE_SET_USED(last);
> +	RTE_SET_USED(list);
> +	RTE_SET_USED(num);
> +
> +	return NULL;
> +#else
> +	struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head;
> +	int success;
> +
> +	/* Reserve num elements, if available */
> +	while (1) {
> +		uint64_t len = rte_atomic64_read(&list->len);
> +
> +		/* Does the list contain enough elements? */
> +		if (unlikely(len < num))
> +			return NULL;
> +
> +		if (rte_atomic64_cmpset((volatile uint64_t *)&list->len,
> +					len, len - num))
> +			break;
> +	}
> +
> +	old_head = list->head;
> +
> +	/* Pop num elements */
> +	do {
> +		struct rte_stack_lf_head new_head;
> +		struct rte_stack_lf_elem *tmp;
> +		unsigned int i;
> +
> +		rte_prefetch0(old_head.top);
> +
> +		tmp = old_head.top;
> +
> +		/* Traverse the list to find the new head. A next pointer will
> +		 * either point to another element or NULL; if a thread
> +		 * encounters a pointer that has already been popped, the
> CAS
> +		 * will fail.
> +		 */
> +		for (i = 0; i < num && tmp != NULL; i++) {
> +			rte_prefetch0(tmp->next);
> +			if (obj_table)
> +				obj_table[i] = tmp->data;
> +			if (last)
> +				*last = tmp;
> +			tmp = tmp->next;
> +		}
> +
> +		/* If NULL was encountered, the list was modified while
> +		 * traversing it. Retry.
> +		 */
> +		if (i != num)
> +			continue;
> +
> +		new_head.top = tmp;
> +		new_head.cnt = old_head.cnt + 1;
> +
> +		/* old_head is updated on failure */
> +		success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(
> +				(rte_int128_t *)&list->head,
> +				(rte_int128_t *)&old_head,
> +				(rte_int128_t *)&new_head,
> +				1, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE,
> +				__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
Just wondering if  'rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange' for x86 should have compiler barriers based on the memory order passed?
C++11 memory model is getting mixed with barrier based model. I think this is something that needs to be discussed at a wider level.

> +	} while (success == 0);
> +
> +	return old_head.top;
> +#endif
> +}
> +
> +#endif /* _RTE_STACK_GENERIC_H_ */
> --
> 2.13.6


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-03-28 23:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 228+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-22 16:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Subject: [PATCH ...] Add stack library and new mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:43   ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28  5:10     ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:46   ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:59   ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28  5:11     ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:04   ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28   ` Olivier Matz
     [not found]     ` <2EC44CCD3517A842B44C82651A5557A14AF13386@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com>
2019-03-01 20:53       ` [dpdk-dev] FW: " Eads, Gage
2019-03-01 21:12         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-01 21:29           ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] test/stack: add non-blocking stack tests Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28   ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mempool/stack: add non-blocking stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:29   ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-14  8:00       ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14  8:00         ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:26       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:26         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:23         ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:23           ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 21:07           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-29 21:07             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 17:41           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:41             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:34             ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:34               ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-14  8:00       ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14  8:00         ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14  8:01       ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14  8:01         ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli [this message]
2019-03-28 23:27         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:25         ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:25           ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14  8:04       ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14  8:04         ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27       ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27         ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:24         ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:24           ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01  0:06           ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01  0:06             ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:06             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:06               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 20:21               ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 20:21                 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00         ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 18:08           ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 18:08             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01  0:12           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:14             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:14               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-03 17:06               ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:06                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:13                 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:13                   ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:23                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:23                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:11             ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:11               ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:04           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:04             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:10             ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:10               ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:09           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:39             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:39               ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:49               ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:49                 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50             ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 22:41                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 22:41                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:05                   ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:05                     ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20               ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 13:30                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 13:30                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 14:14                     ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 14:14                       ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04  7:34                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04  7:34                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01                     ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 15:42                   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 15:42                     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=VE1PR08MB514913AF291D82A8E5B90D2798590@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gage.eads@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).