From: "Eads, Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>
To: Honnappa Nagarahalli <Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Cc: "olivier.matz@6wind.com" <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Gavin Hu (Arm Technology China)" <Gavin.Hu@arm.com>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, "thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
nd <nd@arm.com>, Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation
Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2019 19:24:45 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E5420D940@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190329192445.UDcuSMiqIB3GSv1bf9zhHz0zh9vkHP2QfKT8X2-G4qg@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VE1PR08MB5149F2B5E1A3AC800BC71D8698590@VE1PR08MB5149.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com>
[snip]
> > +static __rte_always_inline void
> > +__rte_stack_lf_push(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list,
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_elem *first,
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_elem *last,
> > + unsigned int num)
> > +{
> > +#ifndef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> > + RTE_SET_USED(first);
> > + RTE_SET_USED(last);
> > + RTE_SET_USED(list);
> > + RTE_SET_USED(num);
> > +#else
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head;
> > + int success;
> > +
> > + old_head = list->head;
> This can be a torn read (same as you have mentioned in
> __rte_stack_lf_pop). I suggest we use acquire thread fence here as well
> (please see the comments in __rte_stack_lf_pop).
Agreed. I'll add the acquire fence.
> > +
> > + do {
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_head new_head;
> > +
> We can add __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) here (please see
> the comments in __rte_stack_lf_pop).
Will add the fence here.
> > + /* Swing the top pointer to the first element in the list and
> > + * make the last element point to the old top.
> > + */
> > + new_head.top = first;
> > + new_head.cnt = old_head.cnt + 1;
> > +
> > + last->next = old_head.top;
> > +
> > + /* Use the release memmodel to ensure the writes to the LF
> > LIFO
> > + * elements are visible before the head pointer write.
> > + */
> > + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&list->head,
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&old_head,
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&new_head,
> > + 1, __ATOMIC_RELEASE,
> > + __ATOMIC_RELAXED);
> Success memory order can be RELAXED as the store to list->len.cnt is
> RELEASE.
The RELEASE success order here ensures that the store to 'last->next' is visible before the head update. The RELEASE in the list->len.cnt store only guarantees that the preceding stores are visible before list->len.cnt's store, but doesn't guarantee any ordering between the 'last->next' store and the head update, so we can't rely on that.
> > + } while (success == 0);
> > +
> > + /* Ensure the stack modifications are not reordered with respect
> > + * to the LIFO len update.
> > + */
> > + __atomic_add_fetch(&list->len.cnt, num, __ATOMIC_RELEASE);
> > #endif }
> > +
> > +static __rte_always_inline struct rte_stack_lf_elem *
> > +__rte_stack_lf_pop(struct rte_stack_lf_list *list,
> > + unsigned int num,
> > + void **obj_table,
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_elem **last) { #ifndef
> RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> > + RTE_SET_USED(obj_table);
> > + RTE_SET_USED(last);
> > + RTE_SET_USED(list);
> > + RTE_SET_USED(num);
> > +
> > + return NULL;
> > +#else
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_head old_head;
> > + int success;
> > +
> > + /* Reserve num elements, if available */
> > + while (1) {
> > + uint64_t len = __atomic_load_n(&list->len.cnt,
> > + __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> This can be outside the loop.
Good idea. I'll move this out of the loop and change the atomic_compare_exchange_n's failure memory order to ACQUIRE.
> > +
> > + /* Does the list contain enough elements? */
> > + if (unlikely(len < num))
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + if (__atomic_compare_exchange_n(&list->len.cnt,
> > + &len, len - num,
> > + 0, __ATOMIC_RELAXED,
> > + __ATOMIC_RELAXED))
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > +#ifndef RTE_ARCH_X86_64
> > + /* Use the acquire memmodel to ensure the reads to the LF LIFO
> > elements
> > + * are properly ordered with respect to the head pointer read.
> > + *
> > + * Note that for aarch64, GCC's implementation of __atomic_load_16
> > in
> > + * libatomic uses locks, and so this function should be replaced by
> > + * a new function (e.g. "rte_atomic128_load()").
> aarch64 does not have 'pure' atomic 128b load instructions. They have to be
> implemented using load/store exclusives.
>
> > + */
> > + __atomic_load((volatile __int128 *)&list->head,
> > + &old_head,
> > + __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> Since, we know of x86/aarch64 (power?) that cannot implement pure atomic
> 128b loads, should we just use relaxed reads and assume the possibility of
> torn reads for all architectures? Then, we can use acquire fence to prevent
> the reordering (see below)
That's a cleaner solution. I'll implement that, dropping the architecture distinction.
> > +#else
> > + /* x86-64 does not require an atomic load here; if a torn read
> > +occurs,
> IMO, we should not make architecture specific distinctions as this algorithm is
> based on C11 memory model.
>
> > + * the CAS will fail and set old_head to the correct/latest value.
> > + */
> > + old_head = list->head;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + /* Pop num elements */
> > + do {
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_head new_head;
> > + struct rte_stack_lf_elem *tmp;
> > + unsigned int i;
> > +
> We can add __atomic_thread_fence(__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE) here.
Will do.
> > + rte_prefetch0(old_head.top);
> > +
> > + tmp = old_head.top;
> > +
> > + /* Traverse the list to find the new head. A next pointer will
> > + * either point to another element or NULL; if a thread
> > + * encounters a pointer that has already been popped, the
> > CAS
> > + * will fail.
> > + */
> > + for (i = 0; i < num && tmp != NULL; i++) {
> > + rte_prefetch0(tmp->next);
> > + if (obj_table)
> > + obj_table[i] = tmp->data;
> > + if (last)
> > + *last = tmp;
> > + tmp = tmp->next;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* If NULL was encountered, the list was modified while
> > + * traversing it. Retry.
> > + */
> > + if (i != num)
> > + continue;
> > +
> > + new_head.top = tmp;
> > + new_head.cnt = old_head.cnt + 1;
> > +
> > + success = rte_atomic128_cmp_exchange(
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&list->head,
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&old_head,
> > + (rte_int128_t *)&new_head,
> > + 1, __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE,
> > + __ATOMIC_ACQUIRE);
> The success order should be __ATOMIC_RELEASE as the write to list->len.cnt
> is relaxed.
> The failure order can be __ATOMIC_RELAXED if the thread fence is added.
Agreed on both counts. Will address.
> > + } while (success == 0);
> > +
> > + return old_head.top;
> > +#endif
> > +}
> > +
> > +#endif /* _RTE_STACK_C11_MEM_H_ */
> > --
> > 2.13.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-29 19:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 228+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-22 16:06 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Subject: [PATCH ...] Add stack library and new mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/7] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:43 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28 5:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/7] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:46 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/7] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 10:59 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-28 5:11 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 4/7] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 5/7] stack: add non-blocking stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28 ` Olivier Matz
[not found] ` <2EC44CCD3517A842B44C82651A5557A14AF13386@fmsmsx118.amr.corp.intel.com>
2019-03-01 20:53 ` [dpdk-dev] FW: " Eads, Gage
2019-03-01 21:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-01 21:29 ` Eads, Gage
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 6/7] test/stack: add non-blocking stack tests Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:28 ` Olivier Matz
2019-02-22 16:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 7/7] mempool/stack: add non-blocking stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-02-25 11:29 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-05 16:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:26 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:23 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-03-29 21:07 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 17:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 17:41 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:34 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:00 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:01 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:01 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:25 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-29 19:25 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-14 8:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-14 8:04 ` Olivier Matz
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-28 23:27 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-03-29 19:24 ` Eads, Gage [this message]
2019-03-29 19:24 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 0:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 0:06 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 19:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 19:06 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 20:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-01 20:21 ` Eads, Gage
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-06 14:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-03-28 18:00 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 18:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 18:08 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 0:12 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:14 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-03 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:13 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:13 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:23 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-02 11:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-02 11:11 ` Honnappa Nagarahalli
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-01 21:14 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 17:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:04 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 17:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 17:10 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:09 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:39 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:39 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 20:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:49 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 22:41 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:05 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 20:50 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 13:30 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 14:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-04 14:14 ` Eads, Gage
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 7:34 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-03 23:20 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 1/8] stack: introduce rte stack library Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 2/8] mempool/stack: convert mempool to use rte stack Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 3/8] test/stack: add stack test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 4/8] test/stack: add stack perf test Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 5/8] stack: add lock-free stack implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 6/8] stack: add C11 atomic implementation Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 7/8] test/stack: add lock-free stack tests Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 8/8] mempool/stack: add lock-free stack mempool handler Gage Eads
2019-04-04 10:01 ` Gage Eads
2019-04-04 15:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v10 0/8] Add stack library and new " Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-04 15:42 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9184057F7FC11744A2107296B6B8EB1E5420D940@FMSMSX108.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=gage.eads@intel.com \
--cc=Gavin.Hu@arm.com \
--cc=Honnappa.Nagarahalli@arm.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).