From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"thomas@monjalon.net" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"arybchenko@solarflare.com" <arybchenko@solarflare.com>,
"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
"radhika.chirra@ibm.com" <radhika.chirra@ibm.com>,
"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: missing typecast from void in eth_dev_pci_specific_init
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2019 17:00:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8d4aa6be-a9e9-9618-8e03-833a850d523a@intel.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190415160017.CjJxQ7Rdn99QSprC1Y0z4EayhHzmfYFn0GX4kIMIJ7k@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190412143131.211ba764@shemminger-XPS-13-9360>
On 4/12/2019 10:31 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Apr 2019 18:29:46 +0100
> Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
>
>> On 4/12/2019 6:25 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
>>> On 4/12/2019 6:15 PM, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ferruh Yigit
>>>>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2019 6:09 PM
>>>>> To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
>>>>> Cc: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>; thomas@monjalon.net; arybchenko@solarflare.com; dev@dpdk.org;
>>>>> radhika.chirra@ibm.com; stable@dpdk.org
>>>>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: missing typecast from void in eth_dev_pci_specific_init
>>>>>
>>>>> On 4/11/2019 12:08 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:00:18 +0100
>>>>>> Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 03:16:16PM -0500, David Christensen wrote:
>>>>>>>> The function eth_dev_pci_specific_init is missing a typecast to
>>>>>>>> (struct rte_pci_device *) for the input argument bus_device.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Signed-off-by: David Christensen <drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Radhika Chirra <radhika.chirra@ibm.com>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_pci.h | 2 +-
>>>>>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> diff --git a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_pci.h b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_pci.h
>>>>>>>> index 23257e9..a325311 100644
>>>>>>>> --- a/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_pci.h
>>>>>>>> +++ b/lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev_pci.h
>>>>>>>> @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> static inline int
>>>>>>>> eth_dev_pci_specific_init(struct rte_eth_dev *eth_dev, void *bus_device) {
>>>>>>>> - struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = bus_device;
>>>>>>>> + struct rte_pci_device *pci_dev = (struct rte_pci_device *)bus_device;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Is this needed for building some C++ apps that are including the header
>>>>>>> file (directly, or indirectly), because for pure C, "void *" types should
>>>>>>> be assignable to any other pointer type without casting?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> /Bruce
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Another example of Why the Hell is this inline?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> It has been done inline intentionally at the time as far as remember, this
>>>>> header is for drivers not for applications, it has helper functions.
>>>>>
>>>>> The common code from drivers related to the bus put into header files, so the
>>>>> code itself belongs to drivers not ethdev and reduces duplicates in them.
>>>>
>>>> Ok that's the common code used by the drivers...
>>>> But why it still can't be in .c file?
>>>
>>> When it is in .c file, it will be either in ethdev library, single location in
>>> .c file and binary file, but location is not exactly right, because code belongs
>>> to drivers.
>>> Or code should be in .c files of each drivers, this will be code duplication.
>>>
>>> Having in .h file makes code in single place, but when compiled code will be in
>>> each driver object file/ library.
>>>
>>> Of course it works when put into a .c file in ehtdev, but bus (pci and vdev)
>>> related code are not belongs to ethdev library and I believe shouldn't be part
>>> of ethdev binary. And those bus helper headers are only for drivers to include,
>>> so having inline shouldn't be a problem at all because there is not stability
>>> concern in that interface.
>>>
>>
>> btw, if you put those into .c file in ethdev, you will be creating a dependency
>> from ethdev to bus code, to all available buses which will make impossible to
>> disable any bus type if you use ethdev.
>
> The problem I see is rte_ethdev_pci.h, it should be headers only and then put
> code rte_ethdev_pci.c
>
Where this 'rte_ethdev_pci.c' should be? Because of reasons explained above,
ehtdev is not good place.
Perhaps a 'common' folder for net drivers may work, create a 'rte_ethdev_pci.o'
and link it with relevant drivers.?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-15 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-10 20:16 David Christensen
2019-04-10 20:16 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 20:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 20:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 20:58 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 20:58 ` David Christensen
2019-04-10 21:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-10 21:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-12 17:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 17:13 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-10 21:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 21:00 ` Bruce Richardson
2019-04-10 23:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 23:08 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 17:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 17:09 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 17:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 17:15 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-12 17:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 17:25 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 17:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 17:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-12 21:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-12 21:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-15 16:00 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2019-04-15 16:00 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-10 21:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] ethdev: missing typecast causes C++ build error David Christensen
2019-04-10 21:36 ` David Christensen
2019-04-16 16:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-16 16:31 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-16 16:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-16 16:39 ` Andrew Rybchenko
2019-04-16 16:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-16 16:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2019-04-16 21:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 21:19 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 21:50 ` David Christensen
2019-04-16 21:50 ` David Christensen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8d4aa6be-a9e9-9618-8e03-833a850d523a@intel.com \
--to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=radhika.chirra@ibm.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).