DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Gaetan Rivet <gaetan.rivet@6wind.com>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/failsafe: fix source port ID in Rx packets
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:51:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2732210.eFvFzSlaYO@xps> (raw)
Message-ID: <20190418155118.1vPdaFyhtwBL7fXkU6A_f0P1XcGLBAeSWrpFO1EOwno@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8815526.EAVJVpUmGC@xps>

18/04/2019 17:39, Thomas Monjalon:
> 18/04/2019 17:32, Adrien Mazarguil:
> > When passed to the application, Rx packets retain the port ID value
> > originally set by slave devices. Unfortunately these IDs have no meaning to
> > applications, which are typically unaware of their existence.
> > 
> > This confuses those caring about the source port field in mbufs (m->port)
> > which experience issues ranging from traffic drop to crashes.
[...]
> > +/*
> > + * Override source port in Rx packets.
> > + *
> > + * Make Rx packets originate from this PMD instance instead of one of its
> > + * slaves. This is mandatory to avoid breaking applications.
> > + */
> > +static void
> > +failsafe_rx_set_port(struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts, uint16_t nb_pkts, uint16_t port)
> > +{
> > +	unsigned int i;
> > +
> > +	for (i = 0; i != nb_pkts; ++i)
> > +		rx_pkts[i]->port = port;
> > +}
> > +
> >  uint16_t
> >  failsafe_rx_burst(void *queue,
> >  		  struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> > @@ -87,6 +102,9 @@ failsafe_rx_burst(void *queue,
> >  		sdev = sdev->next;
> >  	} while (nb_rx == 0 && sdev != rxq->sdev);
> >  	rxq->sdev = sdev;
> > +	if (nb_rx)
> > +		failsafe_rx_set_port(rx_pkts, nb_rx,
> > +				     rxq->priv->data->port_id);
> >  	return nb_rx;
> >  }
> 
> I'm afraid the performance drop to be hard.
> How the port id in mbuf is used exactly? What crash are you seeing?

Another way to fix it without performance drop would be to add
a new driver op to set the top-level port id.
This top-level id would be stored in the private structure of the port,
initialized with the port id of the port itself, and used to fill mbufs.

Thoughts?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-04-18 15:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-18 13:11 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 13:11 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 14:06 ` David Marchand
2019-04-18 14:06   ` David Marchand
2019-04-19  8:08   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-19  8:08     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 14:08 ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-04-18 14:08   ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-04-18 14:42 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 14:42   ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 15:08   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 15:08     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 15:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 15:32   ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 15:39   ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 15:39     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 15:51     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-04-18 15:51       ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 16:46       ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 16:46         ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 16:54         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 16:54           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 17:09           ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 17:09             ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 17:43             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 17:43               ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-18 15:51     ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-04-18 15:51       ` Gaëtan Rivet
2019-04-18 17:20   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 17:20     ` Adrien Mazarguil
2019-04-18 18:51     ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-04-18 18:51       ` Ferruh Yigit

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2732210.eFvFzSlaYO@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).