DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	matan@mellanox.com, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/vdev_netvsc: print warning if Mellanox devices are not configured
Date: Fri, 24 May 2019 15:06:17 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190524150617.6b0246ae@hermes.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2097372.dQ5myFMioY@xps>

On Fri, 24 May 2019 19:32:14 +0200
Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:

> 24/05/2019 19:11, Stephen Hemminger:
> > On Fri, 24 May 2019 19:05:20 +0200
> > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> >   
> > > > > > device drivers on Hyper-V/Azure.  If the build system supported dependencies
> > > > > > (like Linux kbuild) this would not be necessary. Meson only does dynamic dependencies
> > > > > > so that doesn't help.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This is a warning and not fatal only because application will still at
> > > > > > least run, and somebody may want to run with SR-IOV with Intel NIC's on Hyper-V.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > The warning is just to give users better immediate feedback rather than
> > > > > > trying to diagnose poor performance or mystery device not found messages.      
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > It really looks strange to me.
> > > > > What you need is to fail at compilation if requested PMD is not built.
> > > > > I would advise to work on a script to configure meson.    
> > > > 
> > > > None of the people that ran into this were using meson build.
> > > > For example, VPP doesn't use meson.    
> > > 
> > > They will use meson when makefile will be removed :)
> > > 
> > > Anyway, no matter the build system, what we want is a way
> > > to guide users to a proper DPDK installation.
> > > Your solution is to add some very specific logs.
> > > My proposal is to guide the user with a script and some
> > > specific parameters so it will fail if a required dependency is not met.  
> > 
> > Not familiar enough with meson magic syntax to make vdev_netvsc not build
> > without MLX. But that would just be pushing the mystery failure further
> > down the road.  
> 
> I think you did not understand my proposal.
> Let's take an example. You give this instruction to build DPDK:
> 	buildtools/build-require.sh vdev_netvsc mlx4

There is no build-require.sh now and introducing yet another tool
is not going to help.

> If mlx4 is not built then it will fail with this message:
> 	librte_pmd_mlx4 failed to build
> So the user knows what went wrong. No mystery.
> 
> 
> > Another alternative would be to drop vdev_netvsc from the default Linux
> > build. That way users would have to enable it manually.
> > 
> > My preferred solution would be to just kill vdev_netvsc and go to only netvsc PMD
> > but that is a couple releases away.  

Let's just fix the meson.build for now to skip vdev_netvsc unless both mlx4 and mlx5 are present.

The Makefile can just remain untouched.
The people with problem are on older releases anyway. So any attempt to fix
the Makefiles won't help those on 18.02, etc.



  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-24 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-05-23 22:01 Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-24 13:26 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-05-24 16:07   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-24 16:38     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-24 16:48       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-24 17:05         ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-24 17:11           ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-24 17:32             ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-24 22:06               ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2019-05-27  8:31                 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-27 14:54                   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190524150617.6b0246ae@hermes.lan \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).