DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
Cc: David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	dev <dev@dpdk.org>, Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
	Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] eal: add lcore accessors
Date: Thu, 30 May 2019 11:11:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190530101118.GA1107@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4005890.T4jVSnTFc5@xps>

On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 09:40:08AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 30/05/2019 09:31, David Marchand:
> > On Thu, May 30, 2019 at 12:51 AM Stephen Hemminger <
> > stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Thu, 30 May 2019 00:46:30 +0200
> > > Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > > 23/05/2019 15:58, David Marchand:
> > > > > From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > > > >
> > > > > The fields of the internal EAL core configuration are currently
> > > > > laid bare as part of the API. This is not good practice and limits
> > > > > fixing issues with layout and sizes.
> > > > >
> > > > > Make new accessor functions for the fields used by current drivers
> > > > > and examples.
> > > > [...]
> > > > > +DPDK_19.08 {
> > > > > +   global:
> > > > > +
> > > > > +   rte_lcore_cpuset;
> > > > > +   rte_lcore_index;
> > > > > +   rte_lcore_to_cpu_id;
> > > > > +   rte_lcore_to_socket_id;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +} DPDK_19.05;
> > > > > +
> > > > >  EXPERIMENTAL {
> > > > >     global:
> > > >
> > > > Just to make sure, are we OK to introduce these functions
> > > > as non-experimental?
> > >
> > > They were in previous releases as inlines this patch converts them
> > > to real functions.
> > >
> > >
> > Well, yes and no.
> > 
> > rte_lcore_index and rte_lcore_to_socket_id already existed, so making them
> > part of the ABI is fine for me.
> > 
> > rte_lcore_to_cpu_id is new but seems quite safe in how it can be used,
> > adding it to the ABI is ok for me.
> 
> It is used by DPAA and some test.
> I guess adding as experimental is fine too?
> I'm fine with both options, I'm just trying to apply the policy
> we agreed on. Does this case deserve an exception?
> 

While it may be a good candidate, I'm not sure how much making an exception
for it really matters. I'd be tempted to just mark it experimental and then
have it stable for the 19.11 release. What do we really lose by waiting a
release to stabilize it?


  reply	other threads:[~2019-05-30 10:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 84+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-08 18:25 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 0/5] make lcore_config internal Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25 ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-09  7:43   ` David Marchand
2019-04-09  7:43     ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 18:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 2/5] bus: use lcore accessor functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-09  7:43   ` David Marchand
2019-04-09  7:43     ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 18:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 3/5] examples/bond: use lcore accessor Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-09  7:43   ` David Marchand
2019-04-09  7:43     ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 18:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 4/5] app/test: use lcore accessor functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-09  7:43   ` David Marchand
2019-04-09  7:43     ` David Marchand
2019-04-08 18:25 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 5/5] eal: make lcore_config private Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-08 18:25   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] make lcore_config internal Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:15   ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/5] eal: use unsigned int in rte_lcore.h functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:15     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03  7:24     ` David Marchand
2019-05-03  7:24       ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:16     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-16 17:03     ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-16 17:03       ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-04-30 20:53       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-30 20:53         ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-01  2:12         ` [dpdk-dev] [EXT] " Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-05-01  2:12           ` Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran
2019-05-03  7:22     ` [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2019-05-03  7:22       ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/5] bus: use lcore accessor functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:16     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 4/5] examples/bond: use lcore accessor Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:16     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03  7:29     ` David Marchand
2019-05-03  7:29       ` David Marchand
2019-04-10 17:16   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 5/5] app/test: use lcore accessor functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-04-10 17:16     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-02 23:15   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] make lcore_config internal Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-02 23:15     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] prepare to make lcore_config not visible in ABI Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25     ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/5] eal: use unsigned int in rte_lcore.h functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/5] eal: add accessor functions for lcore_config Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/5] bus: use lcore accessor functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 4/5] examples/bond: use lcore accessor Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 5/5] app/test: use lcore accessor functions Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-03 17:25       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-06  7:20     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/5] prepare to make lcore_config not visible in ABI David Marchand
2019-05-06  7:20       ` David Marchand
2019-05-23 13:58 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] make lcore_config internal David Marchand
2019-05-23 13:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] eal: use unsigned int in lcore API prototypes David Marchand
2019-05-23 13:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] eal: add lcore accessors David Marchand
2019-05-29 22:46     ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-29 22:51       ` Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-30  7:31         ` David Marchand
2019-05-30  7:40           ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-30 10:11             ` Bruce Richardson [this message]
2019-05-30 13:39               ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-30 17:00                 ` David Marchand
2019-05-30 20:08                   ` Bruce Richardson
2019-05-23 13:58   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] drivers/bus: use " David Marchand
2019-05-23 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] examples/bond: " David Marchand
2019-05-23 13:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] test: " David Marchand
2019-05-23 15:14   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] make lcore_config internal Stephen Hemminger
2019-05-31 15:36 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 " David Marchand
2019-05-31 15:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/5] eal: use unsigned int in lcore API prototypes David Marchand
2019-05-31 15:36   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/5] eal: add lcore accessors David Marchand
2019-05-31 15:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/5] drivers/bus: use " David Marchand
2019-05-31 15:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 4/5] examples/bond: " David Marchand
2019-05-31 15:37   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 5/5] test: " David Marchand
2019-06-04 15:11     ` Eads, Gage
2019-06-03 10:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/5] make lcore_config internal Thomas Monjalon
2019-06-03 20:15     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190530101118.GA1107@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).