patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dmitry Kozlyuk <dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com>
To: Tal Shnaiderman <talshn@nvidia.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	NBU-Contact-Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>,
	"pallavi.kadam@intel.com" <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
	"navasile@linux.microsoft.com" <navasile@linux.microsoft.com>,
	"dmitrym@microsoft.com" <dmitrym@microsoft.com>,
	"david.marchand@redhat.com" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"lucp.at.work@gmail.com" <lucp.at.work@gmail.com>,
	"stable@dpdk.org" <stable@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] eal/windows: fix pthreads macros return values
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 13:03:28 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210412130328.5a7b1db0@sovereign> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR12MB3945DF27B2FB8A2D2A0CD604A4709@DM6PR12MB3945.namprd12.prod.outlook.com>

2021-04-12 07:59 (UTC+0000), Tal Shnaiderman:
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH] eal/windows: fix pthreads macros return values
> > 
> > External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Tal,
> > 
> > Getting warnings from x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc (GCC) 9.3.0:
> > 
> > ../../../lib/librte_eal/common/eal_common_thread.c: In function
> > ‘ctrl_params_free’:
> > ../../../lib/librte_eal/windows/include/pthread.h:42:2: warning: value
> > computed is not used [-Wunused-value]
> >    42 |  !DeleteSynchronizationBarrier(barrier)
> > 
> > Probably applies to other functions and may fire in combination with future
> > backported patches. Hopefully since 21.05 there will be new threading API.  
> 
> Thanks Dmitry, it's odd that the compiler complains only now, I'd expect to see this warning even before the change.

These functions don't have "nodiscard"-like attributes,
so a call without using result was OK, now it's an expression.

> Do we know if the new threading API will be in 21.05? API changes close in 3 days and I didn't see it get reviewed/acked.
> I can change only pthread_barrier_init for now, since currently without this change Windows runtime is broken, what do you think? 

(You probably mean pthread_barrier_destroy(), from which the warning comes.)
Yes, this is worth merging as soon as warnings are fixed.
Not sure new threading API will make it into 21.05.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-04-12 10:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-10 19:54 Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-11 21:00 ` Dmitry Kozlyuk
2021-04-12  7:59   ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-12  8:25     ` Thomas Monjalon
2021-04-12 10:03     ` Dmitry Kozlyuk [this message]
2021-04-12 10:07 ` David Marchand
2021-04-12 10:26   ` Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-12 10:37 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Tal Shnaiderman
2021-04-12 20:38   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210412130328.5a7b1db0@sovereign \
    --to=dmitry.kozliuk@gmail.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=dmitrym@microsoft.com \
    --cc=lucp.at.work@gmail.com \
    --cc=navasile@linux.microsoft.com \
    --cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=talshn@nvidia.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).