DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
To: rasland@nvidia.com, matan@nvidia.com, shahafs@nvidia.com,
	viacheslavo@nvidia.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, nd@arm.com,
	honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com, Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: reduce unnecessary memory access
Date: Wed,  7 Jul 2021 17:03:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210707090307.1650632-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210707090307.1650632-1-ruifeng.wang@arm.com>

MR btree len is a constant during Rx replenish.
Moved retrieve of the value out of loop to reduce data loads.
Slight performance uplift was measured on both N1SDP and x86.

Suggested-by: Slava Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
---
 drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.c b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.c
index d5af2d91ff..e64ef70181 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx_vec.c
@@ -106,22 +106,27 @@ mlx5_rx_replenish_bulk_mbuf(struct mlx5_rxq_data *rxq)
 			rxq->stats.rx_nombuf += n;
 			return;
 		}
-		for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
-			void *buf_addr;
-
-			/*
-			 * In order to support the mbufs with external attached
-			 * data buffer we should use the buf_addr pointer
-			 * instead of rte_mbuf_buf_addr(). It touches the mbuf
-			 * itself and may impact the performance.
-			 */
-			buf_addr = elts[i]->buf_addr;
-			wq[i].addr = rte_cpu_to_be_64((uintptr_t)buf_addr +
-						      RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
-			/* If there's a single MR, no need to replace LKey. */
-			if (unlikely(mlx5_mr_btree_len(&rxq->mr_ctrl.cache_bh)
-				     > 1))
+		if (unlikely(mlx5_mr_btree_len(&rxq->mr_ctrl.cache_bh) > 1)) {
+			for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+				/*
+				 * In order to support the mbufs with external attached
+				 * data buffer we should use the buf_addr pointer
+				 * instead of rte_mbuf_buf_addr(). It touches the mbuf
+				 * itself and may impact the performance.
+				 */
+				void *buf_addr = elts[i]->buf_addr;
+
+				wq[i].addr = rte_cpu_to_be_64((uintptr_t)buf_addr +
+							      RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
 				wq[i].lkey = mlx5_rx_mb2mr(rxq, elts[i]);
+			}
+		} else {
+			for (i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
+				void *buf_addr = elts[i]->buf_addr;
+
+				wq[i].addr = rte_cpu_to_be_64((uintptr_t)buf_addr +
+							      RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM);
+			}
 		}
 		rxq->rq_ci += n;
 		/* Prevent overflowing into consumed mbufs. */
-- 
2.25.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-07-07  9:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-06-01  8:30 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] MLX5 PMD tuning Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01  8:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] net/mlx5: remove redundant operations Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-02  8:12   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-02 10:30     ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-05 10:01       ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-07  8:00         ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-01  8:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] net/mlx5: reduce unnecessary memory access Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-02  7:05   ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-02  7:28     ` Ruifeng Wang
2021-06-30  7:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] MLX5 PMD tuning Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  9:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-07  9:03   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] net/mlx5: remove redundant operations Ruifeng Wang
2021-07-12 15:31     ` Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-07  9:03   ` Ruifeng Wang [this message]
2021-07-12 15:33     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 2/2] net/mlx5: reduce unnecessary memory access Slava Ovsiienko
2021-07-13  9:32   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/2] MLX5 PMD tuning Raslan Darawsheh

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210707090307.1650632-3-ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --to=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=matan@nvidia.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=rasland@nvidia.com \
    --cc=shahafs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=viacheslavo@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).