patches for DPDK stable branches
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
To: david.marchand@redhat.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com,
	olivier.matz@6wind.com, andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru,
	yipeng1.wang@intel.com, sameh.gobriel@intel.com,
	bruce.richardson@intel.com, vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com,
	konstantin.ananyev@intel.com, honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com,
	ruifeng.wang@arm.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, nd@arm.com, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test
Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2021 03:12:59 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210820081259.16161-1-joyce.kong@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210728073322.27011-1-joyce.kong@arm.com>

Function reentrancy test limits maximum number of iterations
simultaneously, however it doesn't free the 'fr_test_once'
memzones after the fact, so introduce freeing 'fr_test_once'
in ring/mempool/hash/fbk/lpm_clean.

Meanwhile, add the missing free for test case on main thread.

Fixes: 104a92bd026f ("app: add reentrancy tests")
Fixes: 995eec619024 ("test: clean up memory for function reentrancy test")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org

Signed-off-by: Joyce Kong <joyce.kong@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang <ruifeng.wang@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Feifei Wang <feifei.wang2@arm.com>
---
 app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
index 231c99a9eb..f53268ac08 100644
--- a/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
+++ b/app/test/test_func_reentrancy.c
@@ -89,6 +89,10 @@ ring_clean(unsigned int lcore_id)
 	char ring_name[MAX_STRING_SIZE];
 	int i;
 
+	rp = rte_ring_lookup("fr_test_once");
+	if (rp != NULL)
+		rte_ring_free(rp);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
 		snprintf(ring_name, sizeof(ring_name),
 				"fr_test_%d_%d", lcore_id, i);
@@ -148,7 +152,10 @@ mempool_clean(unsigned int lcore_id)
 	char mempool_name[MAX_STRING_SIZE];
 	int i;
 
-	/* verify all ring created successful */
+	mp = rte_mempool_lookup("fr_test_once");
+	if (mp != NULL)
+		rte_mempool_free(mp);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
 		snprintf(mempool_name, sizeof(mempool_name), "fr_test_%d_%d",
 			 lcore_id, i);
@@ -208,6 +215,10 @@ hash_clean(unsigned lcore_id)
 	struct rte_hash *handle;
 	int i;
 
+	handle = rte_hash_find_existing("fr_test_once");
+	if (handle != NULL)
+		rte_hash_free(handle);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
 		snprintf(hash_name, sizeof(hash_name), "fr_test_%d_%d",  lcore_id, i);
 
@@ -272,6 +283,10 @@ fbk_clean(unsigned lcore_id)
 	struct rte_fbk_hash_table *handle;
 	int i;
 
+	handle = rte_fbk_hash_find_existing("fr_test_once");
+	if (handle != NULL)
+		rte_fbk_hash_free(handle);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_ITER_MULTI; i++) {
 		snprintf(fbk_name, sizeof(fbk_name), "fr_test_%d_%d",  lcore_id, i);
 
@@ -338,6 +353,10 @@ lpm_clean(unsigned int lcore_id)
 	struct rte_lpm *lpm;
 	int i;
 
+	lpm = rte_lpm_find_existing("fr_test_once");
+	if (lpm != NULL)
+		rte_lpm_free(lpm);
+
 	for (i = 0; i < MAX_LPM_ITER_TIMES; i++) {
 		snprintf(lpm_name, sizeof(lpm_name), "fr_test_%d_%d",  lcore_id, i);
 
@@ -441,19 +460,21 @@ launch_test(struct test_case *pt_case)
 
 	if (pt_case->func(pt_case->arg) < 0)
 		ret = -1;
+	rte_eal_mp_wait_lcore();
 
 	cores = cores_save;
 	RTE_LCORE_FOREACH_WORKER(lcore_id) {
 		if (cores == 1)
 			break;
 		cores--;
-		if (rte_eal_wait_lcore(lcore_id) < 0)
-			ret = -1;
 
 		if (pt_case->clean != NULL)
 			pt_case->clean(lcore_id);
 	}
 
+	if (pt_case->clean != NULL)
+		pt_case->clean(rte_get_main_lcore());
+
 	count = rte_atomic32_read(&obj_count);
 	if (count != 1) {
 		printf("%s: common object allocated %d times (should be 1)\n",
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-08-20  8:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-28  7:33 [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v1] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test case Joyce Kong
2021-07-30 11:27 ` Olivier Matz
2021-07-31  8:42   ` Joyce Kong
2021-07-31 12:03 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] " Joyce Kong
2021-08-17  8:17   ` [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] " David Marchand
2021-08-20  7:57     ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-20  8:52       ` David Marchand
2021-08-23  2:25         ` Joyce Kong
2021-08-20  8:12 ` Joyce Kong [this message]
2021-08-23  2:57 ` [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v4] test/func_reentrancy: free memzones after creating test Joyce Kong
2021-09-16 15:04   ` Olivier Matz
2021-09-16 15:09     ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210820081259.16161-1-joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --to=joyce.kong@arm.com \
    --cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=andrew.rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=nd@arm.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=ruifeng.wang@arm.com \
    --cc=sameh.gobriel@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=vladimir.medvedkin@intel.com \
    --cc=yipeng1.wang@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).