From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>,
"Kevin Laatz" <kevin.laatz@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] eal: add lcore info in telemetry
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2023 08:41:41 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230131084141.7dac021c@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CQ69YD5I3PGE.1N5SJ2W2E5T9S@ringo>
On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 10:40:08 +0100
"Robin Jarry" <rjarry@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> Stephen Hemminger, Jan 26, 2023 at 18:03:
> > Alternatively, you could should check for lcore out of range.
> >
> > Simplified as:
> > struct lcore_telemetry_info info = { .d = d };
> > char *endptr; // init not really needed
> >
> > if (params == NULL) // length check can be handled later
> > return -EINVAL;
> >
> > info.lcore_id = strtoul(params, &endptr, 10);
> >
> > if (*params == '\0' || *endptr != '\0 ||
> > info.lcore_id >= RTE_MAX_LCORE)
> > return -EINVAL;
>
> Ok that may be more exhaustive. But even if the lcore_id is out of
> range, it will not be matched by the callback.
>
> Do you think it warrants sending a v8 of the whole series just for this?
The reason for the range check is to avoid wraparound.
Actually, you need a temp variable there since lcore_id is
uint16_t and unsigned long is 64 bits on most platforms.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-31 16:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-26 15:20 [PATCH v7 0/5] lcore telemetry improvements Robin Jarry
2023-01-26 15:20 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] eal: add lcore info in telemetry Robin Jarry
2023-01-26 17:03 ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-01-31 9:40 ` Robin Jarry
2023-01-31 16:41 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2023-01-26 15:20 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] eal: report applications lcore usage Robin Jarry
2023-01-26 15:20 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] app/testpmd: add dump command for lcores Robin Jarry
2023-01-26 15:20 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] app/testpmd: report lcore usage Robin Jarry
2023-01-26 15:20 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] eal: add lcore usage telemetry endpoint Robin Jarry
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230131084141.7dac021c@hermes.local \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=kevin.laatz@intel.com \
--cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
--cc=rjarry@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).