DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, william.lam@bytedance.com,
	chrisswindle@microsoft.com, aconole@redhat.com,
	david.marchand@redhat.com, henning.schild@siemens.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/1] Add basic support for code coverage analysis
Date: Sun, 20 Aug 2023 08:54:36 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230820085436.259809ae@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220906164309.1771502-2-felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>

On Tue,  6 Sep 2022 18:43:09 +0200
Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com> wrote:

> This patch adds basic support to get meaningful
> code coverage statistics for some central components.
> To keep things simple, we only focus on the parts that are
> tested as part of the "fast-tests" suite.
> This includes the lib as well as drivers that do not require
> special hardware to be tested.
> 
> By providing the gcovr.cfg file in the project root,
> modern versions of meson (>=0.63) can pass that information
> to gcovr, making it possible to configure the coverage target
> of meson.
> This enables us to use the default meson coverage infrastructure
> and customize it for the needs of the DPDK project.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Felix Moessbauer <felix.moessbauer@siemens.com>
> Acked-by: William Lam <william.lam@bytedance.com>
> Acked-by: Chriss Windle <chrisswindle@microsoft.com>

Not sure why this patch stalled. Seems ok but the set of drivers seems
quite small. Would be good to do it across wider set.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-08-20 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-06 16:43 [RFC PATCH 0/1] Add support for code-coverage analysis Felix Moessbauer
2022-09-06 16:43 ` [RFC PATCH 1/1] Add basic support for code coverage analysis Felix Moessbauer
2023-08-20 15:54   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2022-09-14 14:29 ` [RFC PATCH 0/1] Add support for code-coverage analysis Aaron Conole

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230820085436.259809ae@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=aconole@redhat.com \
    --cc=chrisswindle@microsoft.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=felix.moessbauer@siemens.com \
    --cc=henning.schild@siemens.com \
    --cc=william.lam@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).