DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
Cc: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] eventdev: ensure 16-byte alignment for events
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2024 14:30:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240119143041.59802717@hermes.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fcd11d73-d098-4734-9540-944aff73ed71@lysator.liu.se>

On Fri, 6 Oct 2023 14:15:00 +0200
Mattias Rönnblom <hofors@lysator.liu.se> wrote:

> On 2023-10-05 13:51, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > The event structure in DPDK is 16-bytes in size, and events are
> > regularly passed as parameters directly rather than being passed as
> > pointers.  
> 
> When are events passed by-value, rather than by-reference? There are no 
> such examples in the public eventdev API.
> 
> To help compiler optimize correctly, we can explicitly request
> > 16-byte alignment for events, which means that we should be able
> > to do aligned vector loads/stores (e.g. with SSE or Neon) when working
> > with those events.
> >   
> 
> That change is both helping and sabotaging the optimizer's work. Now 
> every stack allocation needs to be 2-byte aligned - in DPDK code, and in 
> the application.
> 
> The effect this change has on an eventdev app using DSW is a ~3 
> cycle/event performance degradation on an AMD Zen 3 system, and a ~4 
> cycle/event performance degradation on a Skylake-generation Intel CPU.
> 
> What scenarios do you have in mind, where this change would improve the 
> generated code? Something where there are no unaligned loads available 
> in the ISA, or they are much slower than their aligned counterparts?
> 
> When I looked into the same issue for the DPDK IP checksumming routines, 
> there basically were no such. Not that I could find.
> 
> > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>

Don't understand what the issue is. Isn't the event structure typically
on stack. Adding padding there would not help.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-01-19 22:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-10-05 11:51 Bruce Richardson
2023-10-05 12:06 ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-05 13:11   ` Jerin Jacob
2023-10-05 13:15     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06  7:19       ` Jerin Jacob
2023-10-05 12:12 ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-05 13:02   ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06  9:37 ` [PATCH v2] " Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06  9:45 ` [PATCH v3] " Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06 10:13   ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-06 10:16     ` Jerin Jacob
2023-10-06 10:19       ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06 10:24         ` Jerin Jacob
2023-10-06 10:27           ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06 10:16     ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06 10:35       ` Morten Brørup
2023-10-06 10:44         ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06 10:29 ` [PATCH v4] " Bruce Richardson
2023-11-12  0:01   ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-11-12  8:30     ` Morten Brørup
2023-11-12 23:31       ` Stephen Hemminger
2023-11-13  7:58         ` Morten Brørup
2024-01-19 21:05           ` Tyler Retzlaff
2023-10-06 12:15 ` [RFC PATCH] " Mattias Rönnblom
2023-10-06 12:19   ` Bruce Richardson
2023-10-06 12:29     ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-01-19 22:30   ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240119143041.59802717@hermes.local \
    --to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).