DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maryam Tahhan <mtahhan@redhat.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@amd.com>,
	stephen@networkplumber.org, lihuisong@huawei.com,
	fengchengwen@huawei.com, liuyonglong@huawei.com,
	david.marchand@redhat.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ciara Loftus <ciara.loftus@intel.com>,
	Shibin Koikkara Reeny <shibin.koikkara.reeny@intel.com>,
	Kevin Traynor <ktraynor@redhat.com>,
	Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [v7 1/1] net/af_xdp: fix multi interface support for K8s
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2024 17:02:27 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2084393b-23c8-4e8d-8dc7-d584e7fac71a@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <37ebae5b-cfb0-48f9-bafb-855e59b6bdc9@amd.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1146 bytes --]

On 07/02/2024 23:24, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Hi Maryam,
>
> How do you want to continue with the patch, I think options we considered:
>
> 1. Fix 'use_cni' documentation (which we can backport to LTS) and
> overload the argument for new purpose. This will enable new feature by
> keeping backward compatibility. And requires new version of this patch.
>
> 2. If the 'use_cni' is completely broken in the 23.11 LTS, which means
> there is no user or backward compatibility to worry about, we can merge
> this patch and backport it to LTS.
>
> 3. Don't backport this fix to LTS, merge only to current release, which
> means your new feature won't be available to some users as long as a few
> years.
>
>
> (1.) is most user friendly, but if 'use_cni' already broken in LTS we
> can go with option (2.). What do you think?
>
Hi Ferruh


Approach 1 is what I was aiming for. I will respin the patchset shortly 
(just trying to break things down into logical changes - taking LTS 
support into account).


BR
Marym


>
> btw, @Ciara, @Maryam, if (2.) is true, how we end up having a feature
> ('use_cni' dev_args) completely broken in an LTS release?



[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1715 bytes --]

      parent reply	other threads:[~2024-02-09 17:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-12-22 11:04 Maryam Tahhan
2024-01-10 14:58 ` Maryam Tahhan
2024-01-10 15:21   ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-01-11  9:01     ` Maryam Tahhan
2024-01-11 11:35       ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-01-11 12:21         ` Maryam Tahhan
2024-01-11 13:28           ` Kevin Traynor
2024-01-11 14:21           ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-07 23:24             ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-09 12:40               ` Loftus, Ciara
2024-02-09 16:52                 ` Maryam Tahhan
2024-02-09 18:07                   ` Ferruh Yigit
2024-02-09 17:02               ` Maryam Tahhan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2084393b-23c8-4e8d-8dc7-d584e7fac71a@redhat.com \
    --to=mtahhan@redhat.com \
    --cc=bluca@debian.org \
    --cc=ciara.loftus@intel.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fengchengwen@huawei.com \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@amd.com \
    --cc=ktraynor@redhat.com \
    --cc=lihuisong@huawei.com \
    --cc=liuyonglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=shibin.koikkara.reeny@intel.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).