DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Wiles, Keith" <keith.wiles@intel.com>
To: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Cc: "<dev@dpdk.org>" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	"Damjan Marion (damarion)" <damarion@cisco.com>,
	"viktorin@rehivetech.com" <viktorin@rehivetech.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	"Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>,
	"david.marchand@6wind.com" <david.marchand@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] spinlock:move constructor function out of header
Date: Thu, 14 Jul 2016 22:45:09 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20AB3D71-1CAA-48BE-A764-3C17C35F0072@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6049792.6bXVORrbVs@xps13>


> On Jul 14, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> wrote:
> 
> Thanks Keith for continuing work.
> 
> 2016-07-14 14:31, Keith Wiles:
>> Moving the rte_rtm_init() constructor routine out of the
>> header file and into a new rte_spinlock.c for all archs/platforms.
>> Having constructor routines in a header file is not a good
>> place to keep these types of functions.
>> 
>> The problem is with linking 3rd party libraries when
>> an application is not linked directly to dpdk libraries, which
>> in this case causes a missing symbol in the linking phase.
>> 
>> Fixes: ba7468997ea6 ("spinlock: add HTM lock elision for x86")
>> 
>> Originally submitted by Damjan Marion <damarion@cisco.com>
> 
> You should keep the original Signed-off and authorship (From: field)
> with "git am".
> It is also easier to track when using -v2 --in-reply-to='<v1-id>’.

I can try and add that into the patch for v2.
> 
>> Signed-off-by: Keith Wiles <keith.wiles@intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile                 |  1 +
>> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/arm/rte_spinlock.c      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/ppc_64/rte_spinlock.c   | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/tile/rte_spinlock.c     | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> lib/librte_eal/common/arch/x86/rte_spinlock.c      | 46 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_spinlock.h         | 14 ++-----
>> lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile               |  1 +
> 
> I am not sure we should add a .c file for each arch, given it is called only
> from arch/x86/rte_spinlock.h.

I did not like having the .c for everyone, but the previous comment seemed to suggest it. I am willing to change it any better method, just let me know what you think. I would like just one.

On a side note I have combined the bsdapp and linuxapp into a single directory before. It is doable and it eliminates a number of duplicate files or code. Plus a also added support for OS X for DPDK, but I do not have access to any NICs with that version yet other then virtual ones. I could submit it and may be someone will write the kext to make it work. :-)


  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-14 22:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-07-14 21:31 Keith Wiles
2016-07-14 21:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-07-14 22:45   ` Wiles, Keith [this message]
2016-07-15  8:16     ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20AB3D71-1CAA-48BE-A764-3C17C35F0072@intel.com \
    --to=keith.wiles@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=damarion@cisco.com \
    --cc=david.marchand@6wind.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
    --cc=viktorin@rehivetech.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).