From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org, stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-stable] [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app/testpmd: fix static build link ordering
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 16:53:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2563842.f8ghPspXGG@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170113032155.GA31838@localhost.localdomain>
2017-01-13 08:51, Jerin Jacob:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 03:27:30PM +0000, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 1/12/2017 1:58 PM, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 10:26:08AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > >> 2017-01-12 13:16, Jerin Jacob:
> > >>> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y)
> > >>> _LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe
> > >>> +endif
> > >>
> > >> _LDLIBS is an internal variable of rte.app.mk.
> > >> Please could you check that there is no issue when using LDLIBS instead
> > >> of _LDLIBS?
> > >
> LDLIBS is not helping the situation as LDLIBS comes before the _LDLIBS-y
> mk/rte.app.mk:LDLIBS += $(_LDLIBS-y) $(CPU_LDLIBS) $(EXTRA_LDLIBS)
>
> But moving to EXTRA_LDLIBS looks OK.But it has to be under CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD
>
> Thomas, Ferruh
> Let me know if you have any objection on below mentioned diff
>
> -ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_BUILD_SHARED_LIB),y)
> -_LDLIBS-$(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD) += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe
> +ifeq ($(CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_IXGBE_PMD),y)
> +EXTRA_LDLIBS += -lrte_pmd_ixgbe
> endif
You need to keep the shared lib check.
Anyway, EXTRA_LDLIBS should be reserved to users and not used in a Makefile.
I prefer your initial patch using _LDLIBS.
Any objection to merge initial proposal?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-13 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-12 7:46 Jerin Jacob
2017-01-12 9:26 ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-12 13:58 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-12 15:27 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-13 3:21 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-13 15:53 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-01-13 15:57 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-13 16:01 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-13 16:12 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-31 10:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2017-01-13 16:02 ` Jerin Jacob
2017-01-13 16:31 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2563842.f8ghPspXGG@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).