From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Olivier MATZ <olivier.matz@6wind.com>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com>,
"vadim.suraev@gmail.com" <vadim.suraev@gmail.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] rte_mbuf: mbuf bulk alloc/free functions added + unittest
Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2015 10:06:38 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F7443@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <550A8BB5.9040104@6wind.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Olivier MATZ
> Sent: Thursday, March 19, 2015 8:41 AM
> To: Neil Horman; vadim.suraev@gmail.com
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] rte_mbuf: mbuf bulk alloc/free functions added + unittest
>
> Hi Neil,
>
> On 03/18/2015 09:58 PM, Neil Horman wrote:
> >> +/**
> >> + * Free a bulk of mbufs into its original mempool.
> >> + * This function assumes:
> >> + * - refcnt equals 1
> >> + * - mbufs are direct
> >> + * - all mbufs must belong to the same mempool
> >> + *
> >> + * @param mbufs
> >> + * Array of pointers to mbuf
> >> + * @param count
> >> + * Array size
> >> + */
> >> +static inline void rte_pktmbuf_bulk_free(struct rte_mbuf **mbufs,
> >> + unsigned count)
> >> +{
> >> + unsigned idx;
> >> +
> >> + RTE_MBUF_ASSERT(count > 0);
> >> +
> >> + for (idx = 0; idx < count; idx++) {
> >> + RTE_MBUF_ASSERT(mbufs[idx]->pool == mbufs[0]->pool);
> >> + RTE_MBUF_ASSERT(rte_mbuf_refcnt_read(mbufs[idx]) == 1);
> >> + rte_mbuf_refcnt_set(mbufs[idx], 0);
> > This is really a misuse of the API. The entire point of reference counting is
> > to know when an mbuf has no more references and can be freed. By forcing all
> > the reference counts to zero here, you allow the refcnt infrastructure to be
> > circumvented, causing memory leaks.
> >
> > I think what you need to do here is enhance the underlying pktmbuf interface
> > such that an rte_mbuf structure has a destructor method association with it
> > which is called when its refcnt reaches zero. That way the
> > rte_pktmbuf_bulk_free function can just decrement the refcnt on each
> > mbuf_structure, and the pool as a whole can be returned when the destructor
> > function discovers that all mbufs in that bulk pool are freed.
>
> I don't really understand what's the problem here. The API explicitly
> describes the conditions for calling this functions: the segments are
> directs, they belong to the same mempool, and their refcnt is 1.
>
> This function could be useful in a driver which knows that the mbuf
> it allocated matches this conditions. I think an application that
> only uses direct mbufs and one mempool could also use this function.
I also don't see anything wrong with that function.
As long, as user makes sure that all mbufs in the bulk satisfy the required conditions it should be ok, I think.
Of course, it's usage is limited, but I suppose the author has some scenario in mind, when introduced it.
Konstantin
>
> Regards,
> Olivier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-19 10:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-18 20:21 vadim.suraev
2015-03-18 20:58 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-19 8:41 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-03-19 10:06 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2015-03-19 13:16 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-23 16:44 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-03-23 17:31 ` Vadim Suraev
2015-03-23 23:48 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-24 7:53 ` Vadim Suraev
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258214071C0@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-03-24 11:00 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-23 18:45 ` Neil Horman
2015-03-30 19:04 ` Vadim Suraev
2015-03-30 20:15 ` Neil Horman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-03-17 21:36 vadim.suraev
2015-03-17 23:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-18 5:19 ` Vadim Suraev
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F7053@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-03-18 9:56 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-18 10:41 ` Vadim Suraev
[not found] ` <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F7136@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com>
2015-03-18 15:13 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-19 8:13 ` Olivier MATZ
2015-03-19 10:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-03-19 10:54 ` Olivier MATZ
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258213F7443@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=nhorman@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
--cc=vadim.suraev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).