From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Chen, Jing D" <jing.d.chen@intel.com>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/14] fm10k: add Vector RX function
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:14:26 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AA15D5@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1443531824-22767-7-git-send-email-jing.d.chen@intel.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Chen Jing D(Mark)
> Sent: Tuesday, September 29, 2015 2:04 PM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/14] fm10k: add Vector RX function
>
> From: "Chen Jing D(Mark)" <jing.d.chen@intel.com>
>
> Add func fm10k_recv_raw_pkts_vec to parse raw packets, in which
> includes possible chained packets.
> Add func fm10k_recv_pkts_vec to receive single mbuf packet.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chen Jing D(Mark) <jing.d.chen@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h | 1 +
> drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c | 213 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 214 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h
> index d924cae..285254f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k.h
> @@ -327,4 +327,5 @@ uint16_t fm10k_xmit_pkts(void *tx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **tx_pkts,
> uint16_t nb_pkts);
>
> int fm10k_rxq_vec_setup(struct fm10k_rx_queue *rxq);
> +uint16_t fm10k_recv_pkts_vec(void *, struct rte_mbuf **, uint16_t);
> #endif
> diff --git a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> index 581a309..63b34b5 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/fm10k/fm10k_rxtx_vec.c
> @@ -281,3 +281,216 @@ fm10k_rxq_rearm(struct fm10k_rx_queue *rxq)
> /* Update the tail pointer on the NIC */
> FM10K_PCI_REG_WRITE(rxq->tail_ptr, rx_id);
> }
> +
> +/*
> + * vPMD receive routine, now only accept (nb_pkts == RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST)
> + * in one loop
> + *
> + * Notice:
> + * - nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, just return no packet
> + * - nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST, only scan RTE_IXGBE_VPMD_RX_BURST
> + * numbers of DD bit
> + * - don't support ol_flags for rss and csum err
> + */
> +static inline uint16_t
> +fm10k_recv_raw_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts, uint8_t *split_packet)
> +{
> + volatile union fm10k_rx_desc *rxdp;
> + struct rte_mbuf **mbufp;
> + uint16_t nb_pkts_recd;
> + int pos;
> + struct fm10k_rx_queue *rxq = rx_queue;
> + uint64_t var;
> + __m128i shuf_msk;
> + __m128i dd_check, eop_check;
> + uint16_t next_dd;
> +
> + next_dd = rxq->next_dd;
> +
> + if (unlikely(nb_pkts < RTE_FM10K_MAX_RX_BURST))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* Just the act of getting into the function from the application is
> + * going to cost about 7 cycles
> + */
> + rxdp = rxq->hw_ring + next_dd;
> +
> + _mm_prefetch((const void *)rxdp, _MM_HINT_T0);
> +
> + /* See if we need to rearm the RX queue - gives the prefetch a bit
> + * of time to act
> + */
> + if (rxq->rxrearm_nb > RTE_FM10K_RXQ_REARM_THRESH)
> + fm10k_rxq_rearm(rxq);
> +
> + /* Before we start moving massive data around, check to see if
> + * there is actually a packet available
> + */
> + if (!(rxdp->d.staterr & FM10K_RXD_STATUS_DD))
> + return 0;
> +
> + /* 4 packets DD mask */
> + dd_check = _mm_set_epi64x(0x0000000100000001LL, 0x0000000100000001LL);
> +
> + /* 4 packets EOP mask */
> + eop_check = _mm_set_epi64x(0x0000000200000002LL, 0x0000000200000002LL);
> +
> + /* mask to shuffle from desc. to mbuf */
> + shuf_msk = _mm_set_epi8(
> + 7, 6, 5, 4, /* octet 4~7, 32bits rss */
> + 15, 14, /* octet 14~15, low 16 bits vlan_macip */
> + 13, 12, /* octet 12~13, 16 bits data_len */
> + 0xFF, 0xFF, /* skip high 16 bits pkt_len, zero out */
> + 13, 12, /* octet 12~13, low 16 bits pkt_len */
> + 0xFF, 0xFF, /* skip high 16 bits pkt_type */
> + 0xFF, 0xFF /* Skip pkt_type field in shuffle operation */
> + );
> +
> + /* Cache is empty -> need to scan the buffer rings, but first move
> + * the next 'n' mbufs into the cache
> + */
> + mbufp = &rxq->sw_ring[next_dd];
> +
> + /* A. load 4 packet in one loop
> + * [A*. mask out 4 unused dirty field in desc]
> + * B. copy 4 mbuf point from swring to rx_pkts
> + * C. calc the number of DD bits among the 4 packets
> + * [C*. extract the end-of-packet bit, if requested]
> + * D. fill info. from desc to mbuf
> + */
> + for (pos = 0, nb_pkts_recd = 0; pos < nb_pkts;
> + pos += RTE_FM10K_DESCS_PER_LOOP,
> + rxdp += RTE_FM10K_DESCS_PER_LOOP) {
> + __m128i descs0[RTE_FM10K_DESCS_PER_LOOP];
> + __m128i pkt_mb1, pkt_mb2, pkt_mb3, pkt_mb4;
> + __m128i zero, staterr, sterr_tmp1, sterr_tmp2;
> + __m128i mbp1, mbp2; /* two mbuf pointer in one XMM reg. */
> +
> + if (split_packet) {
> + rte_prefetch0(&rx_pkts[pos]->cacheline1);
> + rte_prefetch0(&rx_pkts[pos + 1]->cacheline1);
> + rte_prefetch0(&rx_pkts[pos + 2]->cacheline1);
> + rte_prefetch0(&rx_pkts[pos + 3]->cacheline1);
> + }
Same thing as with i40e vPMD:
You are pretching junk addreses here.
Check out Zoltan's patch:
http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/7190/
and related conversation:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2015-September/023715.html
I think there is the same issue here.
Konstantin
> +
> + /* B.1 load 1 mbuf point */
> + mbp1 = _mm_loadu_si128((__m128i *)&mbufp[pos]);
> +
> + /* Read desc statuses backwards to avoid race condition */
> + /* A.1 load 4 pkts desc */
> + descs0[3] = _mm_loadu_si128((__m128i *)(rxdp + 3));
> +
> + /* B.2 copy 2 mbuf point into rx_pkts */
> + _mm_storeu_si128((__m128i *)&rx_pkts[pos], mbp1);
> +
> + /* B.1 load 1 mbuf point */
> + mbp2 = _mm_loadu_si128((__m128i *)&mbufp[pos+2]);
> +
> + descs0[2] = _mm_loadu_si128((__m128i *)(rxdp + 2));
> + /* B.1 load 2 mbuf point */
> + descs0[1] = _mm_loadu_si128((__m128i *)(rxdp + 1));
> + descs0[0] = _mm_loadu_si128((__m128i *)(rxdp));
> +
> + /* B.2 copy 2 mbuf point into rx_pkts */
> + _mm_storeu_si128((__m128i *)&rx_pkts[pos+2], mbp2);
> +
> + /* avoid compiler reorder optimization */
> + rte_compiler_barrier();
> +
> + /* D.1 pkt 3,4 convert format from desc to pktmbuf */
> + pkt_mb4 = _mm_shuffle_epi8(descs0[3], shuf_msk);
> + pkt_mb3 = _mm_shuffle_epi8(descs0[2], shuf_msk);
> +
> + /* C.1 4=>2 filter staterr info only */
> + sterr_tmp2 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs0[3], descs0[2]);
> + /* C.1 4=>2 filter staterr info only */
> + sterr_tmp1 = _mm_unpackhi_epi32(descs0[1], descs0[0]);
> +
> + /* set ol_flags with vlan packet type */
> + fm10k_desc_to_olflags_v(descs0, &rx_pkts[pos]);
> +
> + /* D.1 pkt 1,2 convert format from desc to pktmbuf */
> + pkt_mb2 = _mm_shuffle_epi8(descs0[1], shuf_msk);
> + pkt_mb1 = _mm_shuffle_epi8(descs0[0], shuf_msk);
> +
> + /* C.2 get 4 pkts staterr value */
> + zero = _mm_xor_si128(dd_check, dd_check);
> + staterr = _mm_unpacklo_epi32(sterr_tmp1, sterr_tmp2);
> +
> + /* D.3 copy final 3,4 data to rx_pkts */
> + _mm_storeu_si128((void *)&rx_pkts[pos+3]->rx_descriptor_fields1,
> + pkt_mb4);
> + _mm_storeu_si128((void *)&rx_pkts[pos+2]->rx_descriptor_fields1,
> + pkt_mb3);
> +
> + /* C* extract and record EOP bit */
> + if (split_packet) {
> + __m128i eop_shuf_mask = _mm_set_epi8(
> + 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
> + 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
> + 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF, 0xFF,
> + 0x04, 0x0C, 0x00, 0x08
> + );
> +
> + /* and with mask to extract bits, flipping 1-0 */
> + __m128i eop_bits = _mm_andnot_si128(staterr, eop_check);
> + /* the staterr values are not in order, as the count
> + * count of dd bits doesn't care. However, for end of
> + * packet tracking, we do care, so shuffle. This also
> + * compresses the 32-bit values to 8-bit
> + */
> + eop_bits = _mm_shuffle_epi8(eop_bits, eop_shuf_mask);
> + /* store the resulting 32-bit value */
> + *(int *)split_packet = _mm_cvtsi128_si32(eop_bits);
> + split_packet += RTE_FM10K_DESCS_PER_LOOP;
> +
> + /* zero-out next pointers */
> + rx_pkts[pos]->next = NULL;
> + rx_pkts[pos + 1]->next = NULL;
> + rx_pkts[pos + 2]->next = NULL;
> + rx_pkts[pos + 3]->next = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + /* C.3 calc available number of desc */
> + staterr = _mm_and_si128(staterr, dd_check);
> + staterr = _mm_packs_epi32(staterr, zero);
> +
> + /* D.3 copy final 1,2 data to rx_pkts */
> + _mm_storeu_si128((void *)&rx_pkts[pos+1]->rx_descriptor_fields1,
> + pkt_mb2);
> + _mm_storeu_si128((void *)&rx_pkts[pos]->rx_descriptor_fields1,
> + pkt_mb1);
> +
> + fm10k_desc_to_pktype_v(descs0, &rx_pkts[pos]);
> +
> + /* C.4 calc avaialbe number of desc */
> + var = __builtin_popcountll(_mm_cvtsi128_si64(staterr));
> + nb_pkts_recd += var;
> + if (likely(var != RTE_FM10K_DESCS_PER_LOOP))
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + /* Update our internal tail pointer */
> + rxq->next_dd = (uint16_t)(rxq->next_dd + nb_pkts_recd);
> + rxq->next_dd = (uint16_t)(rxq->next_dd & (rxq->nb_desc - 1));
> + rxq->rxrearm_nb = (uint16_t)(rxq->rxrearm_nb + nb_pkts_recd);
> +
> + return nb_pkts_recd;
> +}
> +
> +/* vPMD receive routine, only accept(nb_pkts >= RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP)
> + *
> + * Notice:
> + * - nb_pkts < RTE_IXGBE_DESCS_PER_LOOP, just return no packet
> + * - nb_pkts > RTE_IXGBE_MAX_RX_BURST, only scan RTE_IXGBE_MAX_RX_BURST
> + * numbers of DD bit
> + * - floor align nb_pkts to a RTE_IXGBE_DESC_PER_LOOP power-of-two
> + * - don't support ol_flags for rss and csum err
> + */
> +uint16_t
> +fm10k_recv_pkts_vec(void *rx_queue, struct rte_mbuf **rx_pkts,
> + uint16_t nb_pkts)
> +{
> + return fm10k_recv_raw_pkts_vec(rx_queue, rx_pkts, nb_pkts, NULL);
> +}
> --
> 1.7.7.6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-29 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 109+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-09-29 13:03 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/14] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/14] fm10k: add new vPMD file Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/16] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/16] fm10k: add new vPMD file Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 15:58 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-23 8:39 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-23 10:01 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-10-27 5:26 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 00/16] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/16] fm10k: add new vPMD file Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/16] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/16] fm10k: add new vPMD file Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/14] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/14] fm10k: add new vPMD file Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/14] fm10k: add vPMD pre-condition check for each RX queue Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/14] fm10k: Add a new func to initialize all parameters Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/14] fm10k: add Vector RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/14] fm10k: add func to do Vector RX condition check Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:02 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/14] fm10k: add Vector RX scatter function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/14] fm10k: add function to decide best RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/14] fm10k: add func to release mbuf in case Vector RX applied Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/14] fm10k: add Vector TX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/14] fm10k: use func pointer to reset TX queue and mbuf release Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/14] fm10k: introduce 2 funcs " Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 12/14] fm10k: Add function to decide best TX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 13/14] fm10k: fix a crash issue in vector RX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-30 8:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 14/14] doc: release notes update for fm10k Vector PMD Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-11-02 8:36 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-30 8:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/14] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Liang, Cunming
2015-11-02 8:38 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-29 9:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/16] fm10k: add vPMD pre-condition check for each RX queue Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/16] fm10k: Add a new func to initialize all parameters Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/16] fm10k: add func to re-allocate mbuf for RX ring Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/16] fm10k: add 2 functions to parse pkt_type and offload flag Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/16] fm10k: add Vector RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/16] fm10k: add func to do Vector RX condition check Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/16] fm10k: add Vector RX scatter function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/16] fm10k: add function to decide best RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/16] fm10k: add func to release mbuf in case Vector RX applied Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/16] fm10k: add Vector TX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/16] fm10k: use func pointer to reset TX queue and mbuf release Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 13/16] fm10k: introduce 2 funcs " Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 14/16] fm10k: Add function to decide best TX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 15/16] fm10k: fix a crash issue in vector RX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 9:16 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 16/16] doc: release notes update for fm10k Vector PMD Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-29 10:22 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/16] Vector Rx/Tx PMD implementation for fm10k Liang, Cunming
2015-10-29 23:12 ` Thomas Monjalon
2015-10-30 3:09 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/16] fm10k: add vPMD pre-condition check for each RX queue Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/16] fm10k: Add a new func to initialize all parameters Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/16] fm10k: add func to re-allocate mbuf for RX ring Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-28 13:58 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-29 5:24 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-29 8:14 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-29 8:37 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/16] fm10k: add 2 functions to parse pkt_type and offload flag Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/16] fm10k: add Vector RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/16] fm10k: add func to do Vector RX condition check Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/16] fm10k: add Vector RX scatter function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-28 14:30 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-29 5:27 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-29 8:06 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/16] fm10k: add function to decide best RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/16] fm10k: add func to release mbuf in case Vector RX applied Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/16] fm10k: add Vector TX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 12/16] fm10k: use func pointer to reset TX queue and mbuf release Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 13/16] fm10k: introduce 2 funcs " Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 14/16] fm10k: Add function to decide best TX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 15/16] fm10k: fix a crash issue in vector RX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 9:46 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 16/16] doc: release notes update for fm10k Vector PMD Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/16] fm10k: add vPMD pre-condition check for each RX queue Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/16] fm10k: Add a new func to initialize all parameters Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 15:57 ` Stephen Hemminger
2015-10-23 8:27 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/16] fm10k: add func to re-allocate mbuf for RX ring Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/16] fm10k: add 2 functions to parse pkt_type and offload flag Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/16] fm10k: add Vector RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 5:24 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-27 5:32 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/16] fm10k: add func to do Vector RX condition check Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/16] fm10k: add Vector RX scatter function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-27 5:27 ` Liang, Cunming
2015-10-27 5:43 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-27 5:55 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/16] fm10k: add function to decide best RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/16] fm10k: add func to release mbuf in case Vector RX applied Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 11/16] fm10k: add Vector TX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/16] fm10k: use func pointer to reset TX queue and mbuf release Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 13/16] fm10k: introduce 2 funcs " Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 14/16] fm10k: Add function to decide best TX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 15/16] fm10k: fix a crash issue in vector RX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-10-22 9:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 16/16] doc: release notes update for fm10k Vector PMD Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/14] fm10k: add vPMD pre-condition check for each RX queue Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/14] fm10k: Add a new func to initialize all parameters Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/14] fm10k: add func to re-allocate mbuf for RX ring Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/14] fm10k: add 2 functions to parse pkt_type and offload flag Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/14] fm10k: add Vector RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2015-09-29 14:22 ` Bruce Richardson
2015-09-30 13:23 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-09-30 13:18 ` Chen, Jing D
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/14] fm10k: add func to do Vector RX condition check Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/14] fm10k: add Vector RX scatter function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/14] fm10k: add function to decide best RX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/14] fm10k: add func to release mbuf in case Vector RX applied Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/14] fm10k: add Vector TX function Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/14] fm10k: use func pointer to reset TX queue and mbuf release Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 13/14] fm10k: introduce 2 funcs " Chen Jing D(Mark)
2015-09-29 13:03 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 14/14] fm10k: Add function to decide best TX func Chen Jing D(Mark)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AA15D5@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=jing.d.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).