From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: Adrien Mazarguil <adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com>
Cc: "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] ethdev: add API to query what/if packet type is set
Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:24:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AE2F5B@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160106172248.GT12095@6wind.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 5:23 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> Cc: Nélio Laranjeiro; Tan, Jianfeng; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] ethdev: add API to query what/if packet type is set
>
> On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 04:44:43PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 3:45 PM
> > > To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > Cc: Nélio Laranjeiro; Tan, Jianfeng; dev@dpdk.org
> > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] ethdev: add API to query what/if packet type is set
> > >
> > > On Wed, Jan 06, 2016 at 02:29:07PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Adrien Mazarguil [mailto:adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, January 06, 2016 10:01 AM
> > > > > To: Ananyev, Konstantin
> > > > > Cc: Nélio Laranjeiro; Tan, Jianfeng; dev@dpdk.org
> > > > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] ethdev: add API to query what/if packet type is set
> > > > >
> > > > > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 04:50:31PM +0000, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Nélio Laranjeiro [mailto:nelio.laranjeiro@6wind.com]
> > > > > [...]
> > > > > > > I think we miss a comment here in how those 2/6/4 values are chosen
> > > > > > > because, according to the mask, I expect 16 possibilities but I get
> > > > > > > less. It will help a lot anyone who needs to add a new type.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Extending the snprintf behavior above, it is best to remove the mask
> > > > > > > argument altogether and have rte_eth_dev_get_ptype_info() return the
> > > > > > > entire list every time. Applications need to iterate on the result in
> > > > > > > any case.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I think we'd better keep mask argument.
> > > > > > In many cases upper layer only interested in some particular subset of
> > > > > > all packet types that HW can recognise.
> > > > > > Let say l3fwd only cares about RTE_PTYPE_L3_MASK, it is not interested in L4,
> > > > > > tunnelling packet types, etc.
> > > > > > If caller needs to know all recognised ptypes, he can set mask==-1,
> > > > > > In that case all supported packet types will be returned.
> > > > >
> > > > > There are other drawbacks to the mask argument in my opinion. The API will
> > > > > have to be updated again as soon as 32 bits aren't enough to represent all
> > > > > possible masks. We can't predict it will be large enough forever but on the
> > > > > other hand, using uint64_t seems overkill at this point.
> > > >
> > > > Inside rte_mbuf packet_type itself is a 32 bit value.
> > > > These 32 bits are divided into several fields to mark packet types,
> > > > i.e: bits [0-3] are for all possible L2 types, bits [4-7] for L3 types, etc.
> > > > As long as packet_type itself is 32bits, 32bit mask is sufficient.
> > > > If we'll ever run out of 32 bits in packet_type itself, it will be ABI change anyway.
> > >
> > > Sure, however why not do it now this issue has been raised so this function
> > > doesn't need updating the day it breaks? I know there's a million other
> > > places with a similar problem but I'm all for making new code future proof.
> >
> > If rte_mbuf packet_type will have to be increased to 64bit long, then
> > this function will have to change anyway (with or without mask parameter).
> > It will have to become:
> >
> > rte_eth_dev_get_ptype_info(uint8_t portid, uint64_t ptypes[], ...)
> >
> > So I think we don't have to worry about mask parameter itself.
>
> Well, yes, besides I overlooked ptypes[] itself is 32 bit, working around
> the type width of the mask wouldn't help much.
>
> > > Perhaps in this particular case there is no way to hit the limit (although
> > > there are only four unused bits left to extend RTE_PTYPE masks) but we've
> > > seen this happen too many times with subsequent ABI breakage.
> >
> > When ptype was introduced we tried to reserve some free space for each layer (L2/L3/L4/...),
> > so it wouldn't be overrun immediately.
> > But of course if there would be a new HW that can recognise dozen new packet types - it is possible.
> > Do you have any particular use-case in mind?
>
> No, that was just to illustrate my point.
>
> > > > > I think this use for masks should be avoided when performance does not
> > > > > matter much, as in this case, user application cannot know the number of
> > > > > entries in advance and must rely on the returned value to iterate.
> > > >
> > > > User doesn't know numbers of entries in advance anyway (with and without the mask).
> > > > That's why this function was introduced at first place.
> > > >
> > > > With mask it just a bit more handy, in case user cares only about particular subset of supported
> > > > packet types (only L2 let say).
> > >
> > > OK, so we definitely need something to let applications know the layer a
> > > given packet type belongs to, I'm sure it can be done in a convenient way
> > > that won't be limited to the underlying type of the mask.
> > >
> > > > > A helper function can be added to convert a RTE_PTYPE_* value to the layer
> > > > > it belongs to (using enum to define possible values).
> > > >
> > > > Not sure what for?
> > >
> > > This is assuming rte_eth_dev_get_ptype_info() doesn't filter anything (no
> > > "mask" argument). In that case a separate function must be added to convert
> > > RTE_PTYPE_* values to a layer, so applications can look for interesting
> > > packet types while parsing plist[] on their own.
> >
> > Honestly, I don't see why do you need that.
> > You already do know that let say RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 belongs to L3.
> > Why do you need some extra enum here?
> > From my thought - the only purpose of mask parameter was to limit number of elements in the ptypes[] at return.
> > So let say user would need to iterate over 10 elements, instead of 100 to find
> > the ones he is interested in.
>
> Since this is already a slow manner for retrieving types, 10 or 100 doesn't
> make much difference. Such a function shouldn't be used in the data path
> directly.
Yes, it is not supposed to be called from data-path.
> My point is, since we're dealing with a slow function, let's keep its API as
> simple as possible.
Well, API should be simple, but from other side it has to be flexible and convenient
for the user.
As I user, I would prefer to have an ability to select the layers here - that's
why I suggested to add the mask parameter.
>By having a mask to match, a large number of checks are
> added in all PMDs while they could just fill the array without
> bothering.
That's a valid point.
We could move filter point into rte_ethdev layer.
So PMD would always return an array of all supported ptypes, and
then rte_ethdev layer will filter it based on mask parameter.
Does it sound reasonable to you?
Konstantin
>The filtering logic is an application requirement that could be
> useful in its own function as well (converting any random value to its
> related layer or mask).
>
> > > This layer information could be defined as an enum, i.e.:
> > >
> > > enum rte_ptype_info {
> > > RTE_PTYPE_UNKNOWN,
> > > RTE_PTYPE_L2,
> > > RTE_PTYPE_L3,
> > > ...
> > > };
> > >
> > > Or even an int value (2 standing for for "layer 2" etc. Tunnel encapsulation
> > > wouldn't be described easily that way though). It's just an idea.
> > >
> > > > > If we absolutely want a mean to filter returned values, I suggest we use
> > > > > this enum instead of the mask argument.
> > > > > Since it won't be a mask, it won't
> > > > > have to be updated every time a new protocol requires extending one.
> > > >
> > > > Number of bits PTYPE_L2/L3/L4,... layers are already defined.
> > > > So let say RTE_PTYPE_L2_MASK shouldn't change if you'll add new L2 ptype -
> > > > there are few reserved values right now.
> > > > if one day we'll run out bits in let say RTE_PTYPE_L2_MASK and will have to increase its size -
> > > > it would mean change of the packet_type layout and possible ABI breakage anyway.
> > >
> > > I'm aware of this, only pointing out we tend to rely on masks and type
> > > boundaries a bit too much when there are other methods that are as (if not
> > > more) convenient.
> >
> > Yes, we do rely on masks in ptype.
> > That's how ptype was defined.
> > Let say to check that incoming packet is Ether/IPv4(no extentions)/UDP,
> > you probably would do:
> >
> > if (mbuf->packet_type & (RTE_PTYPE_L2_MASK | RTE_PTYPE_L3_MASK | RTE_PTYPE_L4_MASK) ==
> > (RTE_PTYPE_L2_ETHER | RTE_PTYPE_L3_IPV4 | RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP)) {...}
>
> All right, let's not use a different method to filter packet types.
>
> > > Perhaps some sort of tunneled packet types beyond inner L4 consuming the
> > > four remaining bits will be added? That could happen soon.
> >
> > As I said above: do you have particular scenario in mind when 32bits for packet_type
> > might be not enough?
> > If yes, then it is probably a good idea to submit an RFC for extending it to 64 bit,
> > or introduce packet_type2, or whatever would be your preferred way to deal with it.
>
> No, really, I guess we'll extend ptype to 64 bit when necessary. My point on
> filtering separately still stands.
>
> > Konstantin
> >
>
> --
> Adrien Mazarguil
> 6WIND
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-07 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 202+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-12-31 6:53 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/12] Add API to get packet type info Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 01/12] ethdev: add API to query what/if packet type is set Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-04 11:38 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-04 14:36 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-05 16:14 ` Nélio Laranjeiro
2016-01-05 16:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-06 10:00 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-06 14:29 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-06 15:44 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-06 16:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-06 17:22 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-07 10:24 ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2016-01-07 13:32 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-11 7:39 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-01-11 10:26 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 02/12] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-06 7:11 ` Rahul Lakkireddy
2016-01-06 8:23 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 03/12] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 04/12] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 05/12] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 06/12] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 07/12] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-04 18:12 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-05 1:25 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 08/12] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-04 11:11 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-05 3:08 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-01-05 16:18 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-11 5:07 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 09/12] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 10/12] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 11/12] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2015-12-31 6:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 12/12] examples/l3fwd: add option to parse ptype Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-04 18:32 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-05 2:44 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-01-05 16:49 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-07 1:20 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-01-07 9:44 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-13 1:52 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 00/12] Add API to get packet type info Qiu, Michael
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 01/12] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 13:58 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-15 15:11 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-15 15:33 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-01-15 15:03 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-25 6:53 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-25 11:17 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-25 14:57 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 02/12] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 03/12] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 04/12] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 05/12] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 06/12] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 07/12] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 14:50 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-25 6:43 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-25 11:10 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 08/12] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 09/12] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 10/12] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 11/12] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 5:45 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 12/12] examples/l3fwd: add option to parse ptype Jianfeng Tan
2016-01-15 14:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-25 10:41 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-25 10:57 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-23 17:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 00/12] Add API to get packet type info Bruce Richardson
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 01/12] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 15:46 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-25 16:36 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-25 17:16 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-26 1:42 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 02/12] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 03/12] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 04/12] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 05/12] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 06/12] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 07/12] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 08/12] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:53 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 09/12] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 10/12] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 11/12] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-25 7:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 12/12] examples/l3fwd: add option to parse ptype Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/12] Add API to get packet type info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:04 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/12] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 00/12] Add API to get packet type info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 01/12] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 02/12] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 03/12] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 04/12] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 05/12] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-02 20:11 ` Chen, Jing D
2016-03-03 6:03 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-03 15:47 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 06/12] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 07/12] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 08/12] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 09/12] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 8:26 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-02-26 8:36 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 10/12] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 11/12] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 0:09 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 12/12] examples/l3fwd: add option to parse ptype Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 13:14 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-26 14:21 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-26 14:27 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/11] Add API to get packet type info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 01/11] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 11:34 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-02-29 16:41 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-01 6:29 ` Panu Matilainen
2016-03-01 7:59 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-01 8:00 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 02/11] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 03/11] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 04/11] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 05/11] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 06/11] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 07/11] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 08/11] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 09/11] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 10/11] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-26 7:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 11/11] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 16:54 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/11] Add API to get packet type info Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-02-29 17:01 ` Adrien Mazarguil
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/11] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/11] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/11] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/11] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/11] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/11] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/11] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/11] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/11] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-02-29 20:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/11] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-01 1:23 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] examples/l3fwd: fix using packet type blindly Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-01 13:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-01 14:17 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-01 14:30 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-04 8:38 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-07 18:51 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-08 17:11 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-10 5:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-10 5:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/2] " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-10 5:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/2] config: enable vector driver by default Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-10 14:26 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/2] examples/l3fwd: fix using packet type blindly Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-03-25 0:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] packet type Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 0:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: refine API to query supported packet types Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: refine new API to query supported ptypes Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 3:15 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/2] doc: update which PMDs can parse packet type Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 14:21 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-25 16:10 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-04-01 15:55 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-25 10:57 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/2] ethdev: refine new API to query supported ptypes Ananyev, Konstantin
2016-04-06 3:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Jianfeng Tan
2016-04-06 14:32 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-25 10:01 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] ethdev: refine API to query supported packet types Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-25 10:13 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-25 0:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] examples/l3fwd: fix using packet type blindly Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 18:24 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-25 0:47 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] config: enable vector driver by default Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-25 18:34 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] packet type Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/11] Add API to get packet type info Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 01/11] ethdev: add API to query packet type filling info Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-10 14:28 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-14 9:44 ` Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-14 9:48 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 02/11] pmd/cxgbe: add dev_ptype_info_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 03/11] pmd/e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 04/11] pmd/enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-10 14:50 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-10 14:51 ` Bruce Richardson
2016-03-10 18:23 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 05/11] pmd/fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 06/11] pmd/i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 07/11] pmd/ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 08/11] pmd/mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 09/11] pmd/mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 10/11] pmd/nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-09 19:31 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 11/11] pmd/vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-10 14:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 00/11] Add API to get packet type info Bruce Richardson
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/11] Add API to get supported packet types Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 01/11] ethdev: add API to query " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 17:14 ` Ferruh Yigit
2016-03-14 20:50 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v9 " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-18 9:17 ` Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-15 1:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Tan, Jianfeng
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 02/11] cxgbe: add dev_supported_ptypes_get implementation Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 03/11] e1000: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 04/11] enic: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 05/11] fm10k: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 06/11] i40e: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 07/11] ixgbe: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 08/11] mlx4: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 09/11] mlx5: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 10/11] nfp: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-14 7:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 11/11] vmxnet3: " Jianfeng Tan
2016-03-18 16:21 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 00/11] Add API to get supported packet types Bruce Richardson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB97725836AE2F5B@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
--cc=adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).