DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Li, Xiaoyun" <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>,
	"Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: "Lu, Wenzhuo" <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>,
	"Zhang, Helin" <helin.zhang@intel.com>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] run-time Linking support
Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 17:56:17 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772585FAA4014@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1507042796-86318-1-git-send-email-xiaoyun.li@intel.com>

Hi Xiaouyn,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Xiaoyun
> Sent: Tuesday, October 3, 2017 4:00 PM
> To: Ananyev, Konstantin <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>; Richardson, Bruce <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
> Cc: Lu, Wenzhuo <wenzhuo.lu@intel.com>; Zhang, Helin <helin.zhang@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org; Li, Xiaoyun <xiaoyun.li@intel.com>
> Subject: [PATCH v5 0/3] run-time Linking support
> 
> This patchset dynamically selects functions at run-time based on CPU flags
> that current machine supports.This patchset modifies mempcy, memcpy perf
> test and x86 EFD, using function pointers and bind them at constructor time.
> Then in the cloud environment, users can compiler once for the minimum target
> such as 'haswell'(not 'native') and run on different platforms (equal or above
> haswell) and can get ISA optimization based on running CPU.
> 
> Xiaoyun Li (3):
>   eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy
>   app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test
>   efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions
> 
> ---
> v2
> * Use gcc function multi-versioning to avoid compilation issues.
> * Add macros for AVX512 and AVX2. Only if users enable AVX512 and the compiler
> supports it, the AVX512 codes would be compiled. Only if the compiler supports
> AVX2, the AVX2 codes would be compiled.
> 
> v3
> * Reduce function calls via only keep rte_memcpy_xxx.
> * Add conditions that when copy size is small, use inline code path.
> Otherwise, use dynamic code path.
> * To support attribute target, clang version must be greater than 3.7.
> Otherwise, would choose SSE/AVX code path, the same as before.
> * Move two mocro functions to the top of the code since they would be used in
> inline SSE/AVX and dynamic SSE/AVX codes.
> 
> v4
> * Modify rte_memcpy.h to several .c files and modify makefiles to compile
> AVX2 and AVX512 files.
> 
> v5
> * Delete redundant repeated codes of rte_memcpy_xxx.
> * Modify makefiles to enable reuse of existing rte_memcpy.
> * Delete redundant codes of rte_efd_x86.h in v4. Move it into .c file and enable
> compilation -mavx2 for it in makefile since it is already chosen at run-time.
> 

Generally looks good, just two things to fix below.
Konstantin

1. [dpdk-dev,v5,1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy

Shared target build fails:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/test-report/2017-October/031032.html

I think you need to include rte_memcpy_ptr into the:
lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/rte_eal_version.map
to fix it.

2. [dpdk-dev,v5,3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions

/lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_x86.c
....
+efd_value_t
+efd_lookup_internal_avx2(const efd_hashfunc_t *group_hash_idx,
+		const efd_lookuptbl_t *group_lookup_table,
+		const uint32_t hash_val_a, const uint32_t hash_val_b)
+{
+#ifdef CC_SUPPORT_AVX2
+	efd_value_t value = 0;
+	uint32_t i = 0;
+	__m256i vhash_val_a = _mm256_set1_epi32(hash_val_a);
+	__m256i vhash_val_b = _mm256_set1_epi32(hash_val_b);
+
+	for (; i < RTE_EFD_VALUE_NUM_BITS; i += 8) {
+		__m256i vhash_idx =
+				_mm256_cvtepu16_epi32(EFD_LOAD_SI128(
+				(__m128i const *) &group_hash_idx[i]));
+		__m256i vlookup_table = _mm256_cvtepu16_epi32(
+				EFD_LOAD_SI128((__m128i const *)
+				&group_lookup_table[i]));
+		__m256i vhash = _mm256_add_epi32(vhash_val_a,
+				_mm256_mullo_epi32(vhash_idx, vhash_val_b));
+		__m256i vbucket_idx = _mm256_srli_epi32(vhash,
+				EFD_LOOKUPTBL_SHIFT);
+		__m256i vresult = _mm256_srlv_epi32(vlookup_table,
+				vbucket_idx);
+
+		value |= (_mm256_movemask_ps(
+			(__m256) _mm256_slli_epi32(vresult, 31))
+			& ((1 << (RTE_EFD_VALUE_NUM_BITS - i)) - 1)) << i;
+	}
+
+	return value;
+#else

We always build that file with AVX2 option, so I think we can safely  remove
The #ifdef CC_SUPPORT_AVX2 and the code below.

+	RTE_SET_USED(group_hash_idx);
+	RTE_SET_USED(group_lookup_table);
+	RTE_SET_USED(hash_val_a);
+	RTE_SET_USED(hash_val_b);
+	/* Return dummy value, only to avoid compilation breakage */
+	return 0;
+#endif
+
+}


>  lib/librte_eal/bsdapp/eal/Makefile                 |  19 +
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.c           |  59 ++
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.h           | 861 +------------------
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_avx2.c      |  44 +
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_avx512f.c   |  44 +
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_internal.h  | 909 +++++++++++++++++++++
>  .../common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_sse.c       |  40 +
>  lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/eal/Makefile               |  19 +
>  lib/librte_efd/Makefile                            |   6 +
>  lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_x86.c                       |  87 ++
>  lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_x86.h                       |  48 +-
>  mk/rte.cpuflags.mk                                 |  14 +
>  test/test/test_memcpy_perf.c                       |  40 +-
>  13 files changed, 1285 insertions(+), 905 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_avx2.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_avx512f.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_internal.h
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_eal/common/include/arch/x86/rte_memcpy_sse.c
>  create mode 100644 lib/librte_efd/rte_efd_x86.c
> 
> --
> 2.7.4

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-04 17:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-09-26  7:41 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 0/3] dynamic linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-09-26  7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-01 23:41   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02  0:12     ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-09-26  7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-09-26  7:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02  0:08   ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02  0:09     ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-02  9:35     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02 16:13 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/3] run-time Linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:39     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-02 23:10       ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 11:15         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 11:39           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 12:12             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 12:23               ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-02 16:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:13   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-02 16:52     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03  8:15       ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 11:23         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-03 11:27           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-03 14:59   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] run-time Linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-03 14:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-03 14:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-03 14:59     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-04 17:56     ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2017-10-04 22:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 0/3] run-time Linking support Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-04 22:58     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 " Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-04 22:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05  9:37         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-05  9:38           ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-05 11:19           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 11:26             ` Richardson, Bruce
2017-10-05 11:26             ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 12:12               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-04 22:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-04 22:58       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05  9:40         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-05 10:23           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 12:33       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] run-time Linking support Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 12:33         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-09 17:47           ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13  1:06             ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-13  7:21               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13  7:30                 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-13  7:31                 ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-13  7:36                   ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13  7:41                     ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-05 12:33         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 12:33         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-05 13:24         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v7 0/3] run-time Linking support Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-09 17:40         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13  0:58           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-13  9:01         ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 " Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13  9:01           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 1/3] eal/x86: run-time dispatch over memcpy Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13  9:28             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-13 10:26               ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-17 21:24             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-18  2:21               ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-18  6:22                 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19  2:45                   ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19  6:58                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-19  7:51                       ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19  8:33                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-19  8:50                           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-19  8:59                             ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-19  9:00                             ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-19  9:29                               ` Bruce Richardson
2017-10-20  1:02                                 ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25  6:55                                   ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25  7:25                                     ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-29  8:49                                       ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-02 10:22                                         ` Wang, Zhihong
2017-11-02 10:44                                           ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-02 10:58                                             ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-11-02 12:15                                               ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-11-03  7:47                                             ` Yao, Lei A
2017-10-25  8:50                                     ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-25  8:54                                       ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25  9:00                                         ` Thomas Monjalon
2017-10-25 10:32                                           ` Li, Xiaoyun
2017-10-25  9:14                                         ` Ananyev, Konstantin
2017-10-13  9:01           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 2/3] app/test: run-time dispatch over memcpy perf test Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13  9:01           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 3/3] efd: run-time dispatch over x86 EFD functions Xiaoyun Li
2017-10-13 13:13           ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v8 0/3] run-time Linking support Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB9772585FAA4014@IRSMSX103.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=helin.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=xiaoyun.li@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).