DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ananyev, Konstantin" <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>
To: "Pattan, Reshma" <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	"longtb5@viettel.com.vn" <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>,
	"dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] latencystats: fix timestamp marking and latency calculation
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2018 14:30:50 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258EA95B151@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1537878252-21061-1-git-send-email-reshma.pattan@intel.com>


Hi Reshma,

> 
> 
> Latency calculation logic is not correct for the case where
> packets gets dropped before TX. As for the dropped packets,
> the timestamp is not cleared, and such packets still gets
> counted for latency calculation in next runs, that will result
> in inaccurate latency measurement.
> 
> So fix this issue as below,
> 
> Before setting timestamp in mbuf, check mbuf don't have
> any prior valid time stamp flag set and after marking
> the timestamp, set mbuf flags to indicate timestamp is
> valid.
> 
> Before calculating timestamp check mbuf flags are set to
> indicate timestamp is valid.
> 
> With the above logic it is guaranteed that correct timestamps
> have been used.
> 
> Fixes: 5cd3cac9ed ("latency: added new library for latency stats")
> 
> Reported-by: Bao-Long Tran <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>
> Signed-off-by: Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>
> Tested-by: Bao-Long Tran <longtb5@viettel.com.vn>
> 
> ---
> v2: remove check for mbuf->timestamp
> ---
>  lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c b/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
> index 1fdec68e3..0f702b722 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
> +++ b/lib/librte_latencystats/rte_latencystats.c
> @@ -125,8 +125,11 @@ add_time_stamps(uint16_t pid __rte_unused,
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
>  		diff_tsc = now - prev_tsc;
>  		timer_tsc += diff_tsc;
> -		if (timer_tsc >= samp_intvl) {
> +
> +		if ((pkts[i]->ol_flags & PKT_RX_TIMESTAMP) == 0
> +			&& (timer_tsc >= samp_intvl)) {

As a nit - I think you need extra tab here, to follow dpdk codying style.
Apart from that:
Acked-by: Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.ananyev@intel.com>

>  			pkts[i]->timestamp = now;
> +			pkts[i]->ol_flags |= PKT_RX_TIMESTAMP;
>  			timer_tsc = 0;
>  		}
>  		prev_tsc = now;
> @@ -156,7 +159,7 @@ calc_latency(uint16_t pid __rte_unused,
> 
>  	now = rte_rdtsc();
>  	for (i = 0; i < nb_pkts; i++) {
> -		if (pkts[i]->timestamp)
> +		if (pkts[i]->ol_flags & PKT_RX_TIMESTAMP)
>  			latency[cnt++] = now - pkts[i]->timestamp;
>  	}
> 
> --
> 2.14.4

  reply	other threads:[~2018-09-25 14:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-09-21 16:01 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Reshma Pattan
2018-09-22  2:58 ` longtb5
2018-09-24 13:07   ` Pattan, Reshma
2018-09-25 15:22     ` longtb5
2018-09-24  7:10 ` longtb5
2018-09-25 12:24 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Reshma Pattan
2018-09-25 14:30   ` Ananyev, Konstantin [this message]
2018-09-25 14:51 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Reshma Pattan
2018-10-25  8:31   ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2601191342CEEE43887BDE71AB977258EA95B151@irsmsx105.ger.corp.intel.com \
    --to=konstantin.ananyev@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=longtb5@viettel.com.vn \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).