From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, olivier.matz@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] lpm allocation fixes
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 17:14:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2983189.UJ094KPj7K@xps13> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1458569175-8742-1-git-send-email-christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>
2016-03-21 15:06, Christian Ehrhardt:
> Poking a bit on autotest revealed a few shortcomings in the lpm allocation path.
> Thanks to the feedback to the first revision of the patches here v2.
> Also Oliver Matz spotted similar issues and made me aware - thanks!
> Integrating them revealed even more use after free / leak issues.
>
> *updates in v4*
> - re-removing the { } on single line ifs accidentially droped in v3
> - adding the ack of Oliver Matz
>
> *updates in v3*
> - lpm create/free path for v20 and v1604 got the same fixes that were
> already identified for lpm6 before
>
> *updates in v2*
> - lpm/lpm6 patches split
> - following dpdk coding guidelines regarding single line if's
> - adding singed-off and acked-bys gathered so far
> - combine all three related patches in one series
>
> Christian Ehrhardt (5):
> lpm6: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm6_create
> lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm
> lpm: fix missing free of lpm
> lpm: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm_create*
> lpm: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm in rte_lpm_free*
Applied, thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-22 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-16 12:33 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 0/3] lpm allocation fixes - v2 Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-16 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/3] lpm6: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm6_create Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-16 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 2/3] lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-16 12:33 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 3/3] lpm: fix missing free of lpm Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-16 13:14 ` Olivier MATZ
2016-03-16 13:34 ` Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-21 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 0/5] lpm allocation fixes Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-21 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 1/5] lpm6: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm6_create Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-21 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 2/5] lpm6: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-21 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 3/5] lpm: fix missing free of lpm Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-21 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 4/5] lpm: fix use after free of lpm in rte_lpm_create* Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-21 14:06 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4 5/5] lpm: fix missing free of rules_tbl and lpm in rte_lpm_free* Christian Ehrhardt
2016-03-22 16:14 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2983189.UJ094KPj7K@xps13 \
--to=thomas.monjalon@6wind.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).