DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>
To: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>, dev@dpdk.org
Cc: declan.doherty@intel.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] net/bonding: fix update link status on slave add
Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 16:34:38 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2d1f24aa-b752-5031-f063-1394c47d64ff@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1527777275-9974-1-git-send-email-radu.nicolau@intel.com>

On 5/31/2018 3:34 PM, Radu Nicolau wrote:

I can see you just prefix "fix" to the title without updating it :)

What about following one:
"net/bonding: fix slave add for mode 4" ?

> Add a call to rte_eth_link_get_nowait on every slave to update
> the internal link status struct. Otherwise slave add will fail
> for mode 4 if the ports are all stopped but only one of them checked.

What is the link related expectation from slaves in mode 4?

What does "if the ports are all stopped but only one of them checked" mean, why
checking only one of them?

> 
> Fixes: b77d21cc2364 ("ethdev: add link status get/set helper functions")
> Bugzilla entry: https://dpdk.org/tracker/show_bug.cgi?id=52
> 
> Signed-off-by: Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>
> ---
> v2: add fix and Bugzilla references
> 
>  drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c | 2 ++
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> index d558df8..cad08b9 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_api.c
> @@ -296,6 +296,8 @@ __eth_bond_slave_add_lock_free(uint16_t bonded_port_id, uint16_t slave_port_id)
>  		return -1;
>  	}
>  
> +	rte_eth_link_get_nowait(slave_port_id, &link_props);
> +

The error seems in link_properties_valid(), does it make sense to get link info
inside that function before link checks?

>  	slave_add(internals, slave_eth_dev);
>  
>  	/* We need to store slaves reta_size to be able to synchronize RETA for all
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2018-05-31 15:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-05-31 14:34 Radu Nicolau
2018-05-31 15:34 ` Ferruh Yigit [this message]
2018-05-31 15:36   ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-05-31 16:13     ` Radu Nicolau
2018-05-31 16:32       ` Ferruh Yigit
2018-06-01 10:18         ` Radu Nicolau

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2d1f24aa-b752-5031-f063-1394c47d64ff@intel.com \
    --to=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).